The evolution of equity in offshore renewable energy: A systematic literature review

IF 4.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 OCEANOGRAPHY Ocean & Coastal Management Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107603
Mohammad Nasir Tighsazzadeh , Andréanne Doyon , Shana Lee Hirsch , Andrés M. Cisneros-Montemayor
{"title":"The evolution of equity in offshore renewable energy: A systematic literature review","authors":"Mohammad Nasir Tighsazzadeh ,&nbsp;Andréanne Doyon ,&nbsp;Shana Lee Hirsch ,&nbsp;Andrés M. Cisneros-Montemayor","doi":"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Offshore renewable energy (ORE) projects are becoming a promising solution in transitioning to cleaner energy, but there are important questions regarding the governance and policy goals of such projects, particularly given frequent opposition from local communities who do not believe these projects lead to equitable benefits. This study explores the relationship between ORE and equity, analyzing how the concept of equity has been conceptualized over the last two decades. A systematic review of this scholarship shows that research from various disciplines has investigated and narrowed the broad concept of equity to a few core considerations, but these have not yet been specifically integrated to inform ORE. These equity considerations have so far evolved through three stages. First, the initial focus was on the cause-and-effect relationships between public perception, conflicts, and acceptance, showing that divergent stakeholder perceptions of ORE can lead to social conflicts, and consequently, low public acceptance. This highlights the importance of recognitional justice to ensure that all stakeholder perspectives are acknowledged and valued. The second stage sheds light on public engagement as a potential solution for converging different attitudes towards ORE. The third stage introduced the concept of energy justice into ORE equity studies, emphasizing the need for equal consideration of energy justice principles. Based on this, we recommend that research and development in ORE adopt a context-appropriate definition of equity and use transdisciplinary methods to facilitate collaboration and integration on unique local social, economic, and ecological conditions. In addition, future research should strive for flexible ORE processes that encompass all principles of energy justice and minimize negative trade-offs by prioritizing local goals. These strategies aim to ensure ORE projects are developed with a strong emphasis on equity and justice that can enable a transition to cleaner energy while respecting local goals and redressing past injustice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54698,"journal":{"name":"Ocean & Coastal Management","volume":"263 ","pages":"Article 107603"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean & Coastal Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569125000651","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Offshore renewable energy (ORE) projects are becoming a promising solution in transitioning to cleaner energy, but there are important questions regarding the governance and policy goals of such projects, particularly given frequent opposition from local communities who do not believe these projects lead to equitable benefits. This study explores the relationship between ORE and equity, analyzing how the concept of equity has been conceptualized over the last two decades. A systematic review of this scholarship shows that research from various disciplines has investigated and narrowed the broad concept of equity to a few core considerations, but these have not yet been specifically integrated to inform ORE. These equity considerations have so far evolved through three stages. First, the initial focus was on the cause-and-effect relationships between public perception, conflicts, and acceptance, showing that divergent stakeholder perceptions of ORE can lead to social conflicts, and consequently, low public acceptance. This highlights the importance of recognitional justice to ensure that all stakeholder perspectives are acknowledged and valued. The second stage sheds light on public engagement as a potential solution for converging different attitudes towards ORE. The third stage introduced the concept of energy justice into ORE equity studies, emphasizing the need for equal consideration of energy justice principles. Based on this, we recommend that research and development in ORE adopt a context-appropriate definition of equity and use transdisciplinary methods to facilitate collaboration and integration on unique local social, economic, and ecological conditions. In addition, future research should strive for flexible ORE processes that encompass all principles of energy justice and minimize negative trade-offs by prioritizing local goals. These strategies aim to ensure ORE projects are developed with a strong emphasis on equity and justice that can enable a transition to cleaner energy while respecting local goals and redressing past injustice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ocean & Coastal Management
Ocean & Coastal Management 环境科学-海洋学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
15.20%
发文量
321
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Ocean & Coastal Management is the leading international journal dedicated to the study of all aspects of ocean and coastal management from the global to local levels. We publish rigorously peer-reviewed manuscripts from all disciplines, and inter-/trans-disciplinary and co-designed research, but all submissions must make clear the relevance to management and/or governance issues relevant to the sustainable development and conservation of oceans and coasts. Comparative studies (from sub-national to trans-national cases, and other management / policy arenas) are encouraged, as are studies that critically assess current management practices and governance approaches. Submissions involving robust analysis, development of theory, and improvement of management practice are especially welcome.
期刊最新文献
Improving the level of land‒sea coordination: An integrated framework for identifying and assessing conflicts in coastal areas Mapping the global co-location potential of offshore wind energy and aquaculture production Spatio-temporal land use change and loss of mangrove forest in two coastal cities in Tanzania and the perceived implications on provisioning of ecosystem services The evolution of equity in offshore renewable energy: A systematic literature review A 40-year assessment of a harvested sandy beach clam population: Environmental and economic drivers of a regime shift
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1