Rothman-Keller model for risk prediction of motoric cognitive risk syndrome in older Chinese adults: A proof-of-concept study

IF 4.5 4区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Asian journal of psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1016/j.ajp.2025.104415
Yixuan Zheng , Haixu Liang , Ya Fang
{"title":"Rothman-Keller model for risk prediction of motoric cognitive risk syndrome in older Chinese adults: A proof-of-concept study","authors":"Yixuan Zheng ,&nbsp;Haixu Liang ,&nbsp;Ya Fang","doi":"10.1016/j.ajp.2025.104415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The risk factors for motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) remains unclear, and a lack of predictive studies on the risk of developing MCR. This proof-of-concept study aims to investigate the risk factors of MCR, and develop and internally validate a prediction system to assess the risk of MCR in older Chinese adults.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Through performing a meta-analysis to obtain the risk factors and pooled risk ratio of MCR, the Rothman-Keller model which could be used to predict risk level of MCR was constructed. A total of 5020 participants from the CHARLS were used to validate discrimination and calibration of model. Predictive performance was assessed using AUC-ROC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The pooled prevalence of MCR was 12.0 %. The results of the meta-analysis showed that there are eleven significant risk factors of MCR, including age, sex, marital status, diabetes, stroke, depression, falls, physical inactivity, social isolation, fear responses, and hospitalization, with <em>RR</em><sub>i</sub> of 3.00, 1.29, 1.21, 1.53, 2.90, 2.13, 2.95, 1.46, 0.79, 1.55, and 1.31, respectively. Rothman-Keller model performed well to predict MCR risk with an AUC-ROC of 0.631 (95 %<em>CI</em>: 0.610–0.653), and the score was well calibrated (chi-square test for goodness-of-fit = 5.981, <em>P</em> = 0.649).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>MCR is highly prevalent in China, caused by the complex interaction of genetics, comorbidities, and lifestyle factors. This study serves as proof-of-concept that Rothman-Keller model performs a good calibration and fair discrimination, which can be used as a simple, time-saving, and cost-effective mean to assess and monitor the risk level of MCR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8543,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of psychiatry","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 104415"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876201825000589","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The risk factors for motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) remains unclear, and a lack of predictive studies on the risk of developing MCR. This proof-of-concept study aims to investigate the risk factors of MCR, and develop and internally validate a prediction system to assess the risk of MCR in older Chinese adults.

Methods

Through performing a meta-analysis to obtain the risk factors and pooled risk ratio of MCR, the Rothman-Keller model which could be used to predict risk level of MCR was constructed. A total of 5020 participants from the CHARLS were used to validate discrimination and calibration of model. Predictive performance was assessed using AUC-ROC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.

Results

The pooled prevalence of MCR was 12.0 %. The results of the meta-analysis showed that there are eleven significant risk factors of MCR, including age, sex, marital status, diabetes, stroke, depression, falls, physical inactivity, social isolation, fear responses, and hospitalization, with RRi of 3.00, 1.29, 1.21, 1.53, 2.90, 2.13, 2.95, 1.46, 0.79, 1.55, and 1.31, respectively. Rothman-Keller model performed well to predict MCR risk with an AUC-ROC of 0.631 (95 %CI: 0.610–0.653), and the score was well calibrated (chi-square test for goodness-of-fit = 5.981, P = 0.649).

Conclusions

MCR is highly prevalent in China, caused by the complex interaction of genetics, comorbidities, and lifestyle factors. This study serves as proof-of-concept that Rothman-Keller model performs a good calibration and fair discrimination, which can be used as a simple, time-saving, and cost-effective mean to assess and monitor the risk level of MCR.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国老年人运动认知风险综合征风险预测的Rothman-Keller模型:一项概念验证研究
目的运动认知危险综合征(MCR)的危险因素尚不清楚,缺乏MCR发病风险的预测研究。这项概念验证性研究旨在探讨MCR的危险因素,并开发和内部验证一个预测系统来评估中国老年人MCR的风险。方法通过荟萃分析,获得MCR的风险因素和合并风险比,构建可用于预测MCR风险水平的Rothman-Keller模型。利用CHARLS的5020名参与者对模型的判别和校正进行验证。采用AUC-ROC、准确性、敏感性和特异性评估预测效果。结果MCR的总患病率为12.0 %。meta分析结果显示,MCR存在年龄、性别、婚姻状况、糖尿病、卒中、抑郁、跌倒、缺乏运动、社会隔离、恐惧反应、住院等11个显著危险因素,相对危险度分别为3.00、1.29、1.21、1.53、2.90、2.13、2.95、1.46、0.79、1.55、1.31。Rothman-Keller模型能很好地预测MCR风险,AUC-ROC为0.631(95 %CI: 0.610-0.653),评分校准良好(卡方检验拟合优度= 5.981,P = 0.649)。结论smcr在中国高发,是遗传、合并症和生活方式等因素复杂相互作用的结果。本研究从概念上证明了Rothman-Keller模型具有良好的校准和公平的区分,可以作为一种简单、省时、经济的方法来评估和监测MCR的风险水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asian journal of psychiatry
Asian journal of psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
297
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Psychiatry serves as a comprehensive resource for psychiatrists, mental health clinicians, neurologists, physicians, mental health students, and policymakers. Its goal is to facilitate the exchange of research findings and clinical practices between Asia and the global community. The journal focuses on psychiatric research relevant to Asia, covering preclinical, clinical, service system, and policy development topics. It also highlights the socio-cultural diversity of the region in relation to mental health.
期刊最新文献
Multi-dimensional recovery trajectories in cannabis-induced psychosis: A systematic review examining symptomatic, functional, cognitive, and subjective outcomes The missing chapter: Supporting PhD students who are also mothers in the climate of academic mental health A data-driven analysis of artificial intelligence applications in depression research: 2020–2025 Core depressive symptoms in middle-aged and older adults in the USA, England, China, and Mexico: Evidence from network analysis Stereotactic ablation surgery for treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: Technical evolution, clinical application, and future prospects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1