Rothman-Keller model for risk prediction of motoric cognitive risk syndrome in older Chinese adults: A proof-of-concept study

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Asian journal of psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1016/j.ajp.2025.104415
Yixuan Zheng , Haixu Liang , Ya Fang
{"title":"Rothman-Keller model for risk prediction of motoric cognitive risk syndrome in older Chinese adults: A proof-of-concept study","authors":"Yixuan Zheng ,&nbsp;Haixu Liang ,&nbsp;Ya Fang","doi":"10.1016/j.ajp.2025.104415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The risk factors for motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) remains unclear, and a lack of predictive studies on the risk of developing MCR. This proof-of-concept study aims to investigate the risk factors of MCR, and develop and internally validate a prediction system to assess the risk of MCR in older Chinese adults.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Through performing a meta-analysis to obtain the risk factors and pooled risk ratio of MCR, the Rothman-Keller model which could be used to predict risk level of MCR was constructed. A total of 5020 participants from the CHARLS were used to validate discrimination and calibration of model. Predictive performance was assessed using AUC-ROC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The pooled prevalence of MCR was 12.0 %. The results of the meta-analysis showed that there are eleven significant risk factors of MCR, including age, sex, marital status, diabetes, stroke, depression, falls, physical inactivity, social isolation, fear responses, and hospitalization, with <em>RR</em><sub>i</sub> of 3.00, 1.29, 1.21, 1.53, 2.90, 2.13, 2.95, 1.46, 0.79, 1.55, and 1.31, respectively. Rothman-Keller model performed well to predict MCR risk with an AUC-ROC of 0.631 (95 %<em>CI</em>: 0.610–0.653), and the score was well calibrated (chi-square test for goodness-of-fit = 5.981, <em>P</em> = 0.649).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>MCR is highly prevalent in China, caused by the complex interaction of genetics, comorbidities, and lifestyle factors. This study serves as proof-of-concept that Rothman-Keller model performs a good calibration and fair discrimination, which can be used as a simple, time-saving, and cost-effective mean to assess and monitor the risk level of MCR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8543,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of psychiatry","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 104415"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876201825000589","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The risk factors for motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) remains unclear, and a lack of predictive studies on the risk of developing MCR. This proof-of-concept study aims to investigate the risk factors of MCR, and develop and internally validate a prediction system to assess the risk of MCR in older Chinese adults.

Methods

Through performing a meta-analysis to obtain the risk factors and pooled risk ratio of MCR, the Rothman-Keller model which could be used to predict risk level of MCR was constructed. A total of 5020 participants from the CHARLS were used to validate discrimination and calibration of model. Predictive performance was assessed using AUC-ROC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.

Results

The pooled prevalence of MCR was 12.0 %. The results of the meta-analysis showed that there are eleven significant risk factors of MCR, including age, sex, marital status, diabetes, stroke, depression, falls, physical inactivity, social isolation, fear responses, and hospitalization, with RRi of 3.00, 1.29, 1.21, 1.53, 2.90, 2.13, 2.95, 1.46, 0.79, 1.55, and 1.31, respectively. Rothman-Keller model performed well to predict MCR risk with an AUC-ROC of 0.631 (95 %CI: 0.610–0.653), and the score was well calibrated (chi-square test for goodness-of-fit = 5.981, P = 0.649).

Conclusions

MCR is highly prevalent in China, caused by the complex interaction of genetics, comorbidities, and lifestyle factors. This study serves as proof-of-concept that Rothman-Keller model performs a good calibration and fair discrimination, which can be used as a simple, time-saving, and cost-effective mean to assess and monitor the risk level of MCR.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asian journal of psychiatry
Asian journal of psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
297
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Psychiatry serves as a comprehensive resource for psychiatrists, mental health clinicians, neurologists, physicians, mental health students, and policymakers. Its goal is to facilitate the exchange of research findings and clinical practices between Asia and the global community. The journal focuses on psychiatric research relevant to Asia, covering preclinical, clinical, service system, and policy development topics. It also highlights the socio-cultural diversity of the region in relation to mental health.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) in patients with major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder and their comorbidity: Comparison with healthy controls” [Asian J. Psychiatry 105 (2025) 104382] Psychometric properties of a Thai version of the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory among staff at a university hospital A retrospective audit of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in a tertiary care hospital in Mumbai, India Postpartum depression: The silent dilemma of Chinese newborn mothers and coping strategies Further afield… Evolving imperatives for adolescent mental health policy in LMICs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1