Analyzing AI regulation through literature and current trends

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100508
Dasharathraj K. Shetty , R. Vijaya Arjunan , D. Cenitta , Krishnamoorthi Makkithaya , Nikhil Venkatraman Hegde , Shreepathy Ranga Bhatta B , Staissy Salu , T.R. Aishwarya , Pranav Bhat , Phani Kumar Pullela
{"title":"Analyzing AI regulation through literature and current trends","authors":"Dasharathraj K. Shetty ,&nbsp;R. Vijaya Arjunan ,&nbsp;D. Cenitta ,&nbsp;Krishnamoorthi Makkithaya ,&nbsp;Nikhil Venkatraman Hegde ,&nbsp;Shreepathy Ranga Bhatta B ,&nbsp;Staissy Salu ,&nbsp;T.R. Aishwarya ,&nbsp;Pranav Bhat ,&nbsp;Phani Kumar Pullela","doi":"10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) technology has been rapidly evolving, necessitating that discussions on the need and design of regulatory frameworks be taken seriously. This paper reviews literature regarding AI regulations on a theoretical versus a practical level. It examines the different models of regulation – some of which are risk-based regulation and others are complete prohibition – to gauge the literature’s predictions on the scope, precise features, and direction of AI regulation. With particular reference to the EU AI Act as the primary case study, the paper analyzes the consequences of rules on innovation and the international standards’ impact on AI regulatory measures. The results show that almost all scholarly assumptions are accurate, showing how the issues are integrated at the practical level and where is it still challenging to comply and enforce. This paper advocates for continuous improvement in AI regulatory frameworks and more international interactions to ensure efficient governance for AI technologies. It contributes to ongoing debates about creating future-proof adaptable robust AI regulations which can negotiate the complexity between technological development and social protection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","volume":"11 1","pages":"Article 100508"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2199853125000435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) technology has been rapidly evolving, necessitating that discussions on the need and design of regulatory frameworks be taken seriously. This paper reviews literature regarding AI regulations on a theoretical versus a practical level. It examines the different models of regulation – some of which are risk-based regulation and others are complete prohibition – to gauge the literature’s predictions on the scope, precise features, and direction of AI regulation. With particular reference to the EU AI Act as the primary case study, the paper analyzes the consequences of rules on innovation and the international standards’ impact on AI regulatory measures. The results show that almost all scholarly assumptions are accurate, showing how the issues are integrated at the practical level and where is it still challenging to comply and enforce. This paper advocates for continuous improvement in AI regulatory frameworks and more international interactions to ensure efficient governance for AI technologies. It contributes to ongoing debates about creating future-proof adaptable robust AI regulations which can negotiate the complexity between technological development and social protection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过文献和当前趋势分析人工智能监管
人工智能(AI)技术一直在迅速发展,因此有必要认真讨论监管框架的需求和设计。本文回顾了有关人工智能法规的理论与实践层面的文献。它考察了不同的监管模式——其中一些是基于风险的监管,另一些是完全禁止的——以衡量文献对人工智能监管的范围、精确特征和方向的预测。本文以欧盟人工智能法案为主要案例,分析了规则对创新的影响以及国际标准对人工智能监管措施的影响。结果表明,几乎所有的学术假设都是准确的,显示了这些问题是如何在实践层面上整合的,以及在遵守和执行方面仍然具有挑战性的地方。本文主张不断完善人工智能监管框架,加强国际互动,以确保对人工智能技术的有效治理。它有助于正在进行的关于创建面向未来的适应性强的强大人工智能法规的辩论,这些法规可以处理技术发展和社会保护之间的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
196
审稿时长
1 day
期刊最新文献
The role of digital twin technology in enhancing sustainable aviation transition: A state-of-the-art review and future direction Artificial intelligence shock in manufacturing: A threat or an opportunity for South Africa’s Labour Market? Factors influencing circular economy business model adoption: Evidence from NCA and PLS-SEM Economic policy uncertainty and artificial intelligence (AI) innovation: A cross-country analysis Hybrid early warning system: Integration of Z-score and machine learning for predicting financial performance of IRB in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1