{"title":"Filling in the gaps from the bottom up: Energy justice guidelines for European Union energy poverty policy","authors":"Ruth Shortall, Anna Mengolini","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.103975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Energy justice can provide a lens for assessing energy policies taking place in socio-technical systems. Although energy justice is a policy priority in the EU, in 2023, 10.6 % of the EU population were unable to keep their home adequately warm and around 7 % of the EU population had arrears on their utility bills. EU policies strive to tackle energy poverty, however, due to its complexity, policies may fall short or even inadvertently exacerbate existing injustices. There is hence a need for improved understanding of the socio-technical factors contributing to the injustice of energy poverty, considering the specificities of each context. There is also no formal assessment framework for energy justice in the EU, despite the fact that a just transition is a policy priority. Current energy justice assessment frameworks are criticised for being too difficult to operationalise or too top-down. We aim to address some of these shortcomings by applying a participatory bottom-up approach, incorporating the Capability Approach, in order to lay the foundations for future, context-sensitive assessments in the EU. We carry out a qualitative analysis that explores the conceptualisation of energy justice according to key energy system actors and householders, who participated in EU-funded energy poverty projects. From this, we derive guideline energy justice criteria, in the context of energy poverty. Our findings may prove useful for policy-makers when designing or assessing R&I calls relating to energy poverty and the approach could be re-applied in other energy poverty policy contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"122 ","pages":"Article 103975"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625000568","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Energy justice can provide a lens for assessing energy policies taking place in socio-technical systems. Although energy justice is a policy priority in the EU, in 2023, 10.6 % of the EU population were unable to keep their home adequately warm and around 7 % of the EU population had arrears on their utility bills. EU policies strive to tackle energy poverty, however, due to its complexity, policies may fall short or even inadvertently exacerbate existing injustices. There is hence a need for improved understanding of the socio-technical factors contributing to the injustice of energy poverty, considering the specificities of each context. There is also no formal assessment framework for energy justice in the EU, despite the fact that a just transition is a policy priority. Current energy justice assessment frameworks are criticised for being too difficult to operationalise or too top-down. We aim to address some of these shortcomings by applying a participatory bottom-up approach, incorporating the Capability Approach, in order to lay the foundations for future, context-sensitive assessments in the EU. We carry out a qualitative analysis that explores the conceptualisation of energy justice according to key energy system actors and householders, who participated in EU-funded energy poverty projects. From this, we derive guideline energy justice criteria, in the context of energy poverty. Our findings may prove useful for policy-makers when designing or assessing R&I calls relating to energy poverty and the approach could be re-applied in other energy poverty policy contexts.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.