Filling in the gaps from the bottom up: Energy justice guidelines for European Union energy poverty policy

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2025.103975
Ruth Shortall, Anna Mengolini
{"title":"Filling in the gaps from the bottom up: Energy justice guidelines for European Union energy poverty policy","authors":"Ruth Shortall,&nbsp;Anna Mengolini","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.103975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Energy justice can provide a lens for assessing energy policies taking place in socio-technical systems. Although energy justice is a policy priority in the EU, in 2023, 10.6 % of the EU population were unable to keep their home adequately warm and around 7 % of the EU population had arrears on their utility bills. EU policies strive to tackle energy poverty, however, due to its complexity, policies may fall short or even inadvertently exacerbate existing injustices. There is hence a need for improved understanding of the socio-technical factors contributing to the injustice of energy poverty, considering the specificities of each context. There is also no formal assessment framework for energy justice in the EU, despite the fact that a just transition is a policy priority. Current energy justice assessment frameworks are criticised for being too difficult to operationalise or too top-down. We aim to address some of these shortcomings by applying a participatory bottom-up approach, incorporating the Capability Approach, in order to lay the foundations for future, context-sensitive assessments in the EU. We carry out a qualitative analysis that explores the conceptualisation of energy justice according to key energy system actors and householders, who participated in EU-funded energy poverty projects. From this, we derive guideline energy justice criteria, in the context of energy poverty. Our findings may prove useful for policy-makers when designing or assessing R&amp;I calls relating to energy poverty and the approach could be re-applied in other energy poverty policy contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"122 ","pages":"Article 103975"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625000568","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Energy justice can provide a lens for assessing energy policies taking place in socio-technical systems. Although energy justice is a policy priority in the EU, in 2023, 10.6 % of the EU population were unable to keep their home adequately warm and around 7 % of the EU population had arrears on their utility bills. EU policies strive to tackle energy poverty, however, due to its complexity, policies may fall short or even inadvertently exacerbate existing injustices. There is hence a need for improved understanding of the socio-technical factors contributing to the injustice of energy poverty, considering the specificities of each context. There is also no formal assessment framework for energy justice in the EU, despite the fact that a just transition is a policy priority. Current energy justice assessment frameworks are criticised for being too difficult to operationalise or too top-down. We aim to address some of these shortcomings by applying a participatory bottom-up approach, incorporating the Capability Approach, in order to lay the foundations for future, context-sensitive assessments in the EU. We carry out a qualitative analysis that explores the conceptualisation of energy justice according to key energy system actors and householders, who participated in EU-funded energy poverty projects. From this, we derive guideline energy justice criteria, in the context of energy poverty. Our findings may prove useful for policy-makers when designing or assessing R&I calls relating to energy poverty and the approach could be re-applied in other energy poverty policy contexts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Can we achieve equity in residential solar adoption? Public perceptions of rooftop and community solar in the United States Government-owned enterprises and sustainability: Review and research agenda Less emissions or less freight? Conflicting narratives for sustainable logistics in Norway When past meets present: A mixed-methods study of heating practices in Sweden during the energy crisis Sustainable energy experiments and demonstrations: Reviewing research, market and societal trends
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1