ISO 14001 and innovation: Environmental management system and signal

IF 12.9 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Technological Forecasting and Social Change Pub Date : 2025-03-06 DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124000
Cesare Antonio Fabio Riillo
{"title":"ISO 14001 and innovation: Environmental management system and signal","authors":"Cesare Antonio Fabio Riillo","doi":"10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The positive association between ISO 14001 and innovation is generally well established. However, the specific mechanisms across the different stages of the innovation process remain unclear. This study argues that ISO 14001 certification acts as a market signal and investigates its impact on various innovation stages, including innovation propensity, investment intensity, and market success. It also explores the relationship between ISO 14001 and different innovation outcomes, such as product, process, organizational, and marketing innovations. Using innovation survey data and certification registers, the study distinguishes the signalling effect of ISO 14001 certification from the implementation of environmental management systems. A structural model evaluates the certification's impact across innovation stages. The analysis shows no significant association between ISO 14001 certification and innovation propensity or investment intensity. However, certification is negatively associated to certain product innovations, particularly radical innovations. Despite this, ISO 14001 certification enhances innovative sales, especially in firms with lower innovation investment. The study highlights that while the standard may have no impact or even a negative impact on pursuing innovation, it can still foster the commercialization of innovative products by serving as a credible market signal. Extensive robustness checks reduce concerns of misclassification, endogeneity and reverse causality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48454,"journal":{"name":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","volume":"215 ","pages":"Article 124000"},"PeriodicalIF":12.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162525000319","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The positive association between ISO 14001 and innovation is generally well established. However, the specific mechanisms across the different stages of the innovation process remain unclear. This study argues that ISO 14001 certification acts as a market signal and investigates its impact on various innovation stages, including innovation propensity, investment intensity, and market success. It also explores the relationship between ISO 14001 and different innovation outcomes, such as product, process, organizational, and marketing innovations. Using innovation survey data and certification registers, the study distinguishes the signalling effect of ISO 14001 certification from the implementation of environmental management systems. A structural model evaluates the certification's impact across innovation stages. The analysis shows no significant association between ISO 14001 certification and innovation propensity or investment intensity. However, certification is negatively associated to certain product innovations, particularly radical innovations. Despite this, ISO 14001 certification enhances innovative sales, especially in firms with lower innovation investment. The study highlights that while the standard may have no impact or even a negative impact on pursuing innovation, it can still foster the commercialization of innovative products by serving as a credible market signal. Extensive robustness checks reduce concerns of misclassification, endogeneity and reverse causality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
10.80%
发文量
813
期刊介绍: Technological Forecasting and Social Change is a prominent platform for individuals engaged in the methodology and application of technological forecasting and future studies as planning tools, exploring the interconnectedness of social, environmental, and technological factors. In addition to serving as a key forum for these discussions, we offer numerous benefits for authors, including complimentary PDFs, a generous copyright policy, exclusive discounts on Elsevier publications, and more.
期刊最新文献
A framework for research on the automation of work How cross-regional collaborative innovation networks affect regional economic resilience: Evidence from 283 cities in China ISO 14001 and innovation: Environmental management system and signal Requirements for trustworthy AI-enabled automated decision-making in the public sector: A systematic review The effect of digital technologies and staff skill sets on hospital resilience: The role of supply chain information integration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1