Comparative assessment of concentrated solar power and photovoltaic for power generation and green hydrogen potential in West Africa: A case study on Nigeria

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2025.115548
C.J. Okeke , P.K. Egberibine , J.U. Edet , J. Wilson , R.E. Blanchard
{"title":"Comparative assessment of concentrated solar power and photovoltaic for power generation and green hydrogen potential in West Africa: A case study on Nigeria","authors":"C.J. Okeke ,&nbsp;P.K. Egberibine ,&nbsp;J.U. Edet ,&nbsp;J. Wilson ,&nbsp;R.E. Blanchard","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The transition towards sustainable energy, championed by the Nigerian Electricity Act (2023) underscores the importance of solar energy and green hydrogen in tackling energy poverty in sub-Saharan Africa, especially in Nigeria. However, uncertainty remains among investors and government entities regarding the optimal geographic, technical, and economic conditions for utility-scale renewable electricity projects. To address this, an evaluation of two solar technologies—Photovoltaic (PV) and Parabolic Trough CSP technology (PT-CSP)—was conducted under specific geographical and techno-economic criteria to support solar electricity and green hydrogen development across Nigeria. The study estimated Nigeria's energy demand and employed site evaluation, Multi-Criteria Decision-Making, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and Geographic Information System (GIS) tools, alongside the NREL System Advisory Model (NREL-SAM) for power plant analysis. Results indicate that 105.63 GW<sub>e</sub> of grid capacity is required to meet Nigeria's energy demand, whereas 57.32 GW<sub>e</sub> from grid-connected solar plants needed to replace unsustainable grid supplying 54.3 % of estimated population. Lagos requires the highest capacity (4.93 GW<sub>e</sub>), followed by Rivers, Kano, Oyo, and Ogun. Land suitability assessment identified 0.79 % (6815.68 km<sup>2</sup>) of Nigeria as highly suitable for solar-hydrogen projects, while 18.49 % (158,450.45 km<sup>2</sup>) is less suitable with most of Nigeria moderately suitable. Regions are ranked with the North-Central and North-East identified as most viable for PV and PT-CSP projects. A comparative economic analysis shows PV is superior in Nigeria, generating twice the energy output and costing six times less per unit of electricity than PT-CSP. These findings offer guidance for optimal solar energy and green hydrogen deployment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"215 ","pages":"Article 115548"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125002217","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The transition towards sustainable energy, championed by the Nigerian Electricity Act (2023) underscores the importance of solar energy and green hydrogen in tackling energy poverty in sub-Saharan Africa, especially in Nigeria. However, uncertainty remains among investors and government entities regarding the optimal geographic, technical, and economic conditions for utility-scale renewable electricity projects. To address this, an evaluation of two solar technologies—Photovoltaic (PV) and Parabolic Trough CSP technology (PT-CSP)—was conducted under specific geographical and techno-economic criteria to support solar electricity and green hydrogen development across Nigeria. The study estimated Nigeria's energy demand and employed site evaluation, Multi-Criteria Decision-Making, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and Geographic Information System (GIS) tools, alongside the NREL System Advisory Model (NREL-SAM) for power plant analysis. Results indicate that 105.63 GWe of grid capacity is required to meet Nigeria's energy demand, whereas 57.32 GWe from grid-connected solar plants needed to replace unsustainable grid supplying 54.3 % of estimated population. Lagos requires the highest capacity (4.93 GWe), followed by Rivers, Kano, Oyo, and Ogun. Land suitability assessment identified 0.79 % (6815.68 km2) of Nigeria as highly suitable for solar-hydrogen projects, while 18.49 % (158,450.45 km2) is less suitable with most of Nigeria moderately suitable. Regions are ranked with the North-Central and North-East identified as most viable for PV and PT-CSP projects. A comparative economic analysis shows PV is superior in Nigeria, generating twice the energy output and costing six times less per unit of electricity than PT-CSP. These findings offer guidance for optimal solar energy and green hydrogen deployment.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西非集中太阳能和光伏发电及绿色氢能潜力的比较评估:以尼日利亚为例
《尼日利亚电力法(2023年)》倡导向可持续能源过渡,强调了太阳能和绿色氢在解决撒哈拉以南非洲,特别是尼日利亚的能源贫困方面的重要性。然而,投资者和政府机构对于公用事业规模的可再生电力项目的最佳地理、技术和经济条件仍然存在不确定性。为了解决这一问题,根据特定的地理和技术经济标准,对两种太阳能技术——光伏(PV)和抛物线槽式聚光太阳能发电技术(PT-CSP)进行了评估,以支持尼日利亚各地的太阳能发电和绿色氢能发展。该研究估计了尼日利亚的能源需求,并采用了现场评估、多标准决策、层次分析法(AHP)和地理信息系统(GIS)工具,以及NREL系统咨询模型(NREL- sam)进行电厂分析。结果表明,满足尼日利亚的能源需求需要105.63 GWe的电网容量,而并网太阳能发电厂需要57.32 GWe来取代不可持续的电网,为估计人口的54.3%供电。拉各斯需要的容量最高(4.93 GWe),其次是里弗斯、卡诺、奥约和奥贡。土地适宜性评价确定尼日利亚0.79% (6815.68 km2)的土地高度适宜太阳能氢项目,而18.49% (158,450.45 km2)的土地不太适宜,尼日利亚大部分土地中等适宜。中北部和东北部地区被确定为光伏和PT-CSP项目最可行的地区。一项比较经济分析显示,光伏发电在尼日利亚更为优越,其发电量是PT-CSP的两倍,每单位电力的成本比PT-CSP低6倍。这些发现为优化太阳能和绿色氢的部署提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
期刊最新文献
Fracture flow channeling in enhanced geothermal systems: THMC feedback mechanisms and mitigation strategies Integrated dark fermentation and bioelectrochemical systems for waste valorization: A review of microbial fuel cell and microbial electrolysis cell coupling approaches Flash Joule heating: An ultrafast electrothermal strategy for solid waste valorization and resource recovery The Renewable energy-Food processing-Sustainability Nexus: A PRISMA review of innovations, sustainability metrics and indicators Thermal interface materials for thermal management of Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1