Influence of concrete interfaces on the damage and pull-out behavior of 3D-printed concrete structures

IF 5.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Engineering Failure Analysis Pub Date : 2025-03-02 DOI:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.109470
Qamar Shahzad, Fangyuan Li
{"title":"Influence of concrete interfaces on the damage and pull-out behavior of 3D-printed concrete structures","authors":"Qamar Shahzad,&nbsp;Fangyuan Li","doi":"10.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.109470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research examines the pull-out behavior of steel reinforcement bars embedded within 3D-printed concrete (3DPC) specimens. A finite element model (FEM) incorporating cohesive elements was developed and validated through experimental data to assess the impact of printed concrete-to-concrete interfaces on the pull-out behavior of 3DPC. A detailed analysis of the interfaces’ influence on the 3D printed specimens revealed the peak load and slip behavior, failure mechanisms, and damage criteria. Additionally, a thorough investigation was conducted on how interfacial bond strength, layer and strip dimensions, print angle, and effective length of bond impact on pull-out behavior of 3DPC. The results reveal that 3DPC demonstrates reduced initial stiffness compared to cast specimens, maintaining consistent stiffness in both the X and Y directions. The mold-cast specimen demonstrates a 9.38 % higher load-bearing capacity than the interlayer 3D printed specimen and a 25 % higher load-bearing capacity than the interstrip 3D printed specimen. The percentage difference between the experimental and simulated results for these specimens is less than 5 %, indicating good agreement. The study shows that the peak load changes with the print angle, initially decreasing from 0° to 30° and then rising from 30° to 90°, with the maximum load occurring at 90°. Specimens printed at a 30° angle exhibit the highest damage due to increased stress concentrations, while those printed at 90° experience lowest damage because of more effective stress distribution. Additionally, increasing the layer size significantly enhances peak load capacity, with larger layers improving load distribution and structural support. Ultimately, specimens with a 50 mm bond length demonstrate the highest peak load and the lowest slip, indicating superior load-bearing capacity and bond performance. In contrast, shorter bond lengths result in lower peak loads and greater slip values. In conclusion, this study provides a foundation for future research on 3DPC modeling, particularly regarding concrete interfaces.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11677,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Failure Analysis","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 109470"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Failure Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350630725002110","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research examines the pull-out behavior of steel reinforcement bars embedded within 3D-printed concrete (3DPC) specimens. A finite element model (FEM) incorporating cohesive elements was developed and validated through experimental data to assess the impact of printed concrete-to-concrete interfaces on the pull-out behavior of 3DPC. A detailed analysis of the interfaces’ influence on the 3D printed specimens revealed the peak load and slip behavior, failure mechanisms, and damage criteria. Additionally, a thorough investigation was conducted on how interfacial bond strength, layer and strip dimensions, print angle, and effective length of bond impact on pull-out behavior of 3DPC. The results reveal that 3DPC demonstrates reduced initial stiffness compared to cast specimens, maintaining consistent stiffness in both the X and Y directions. The mold-cast specimen demonstrates a 9.38 % higher load-bearing capacity than the interlayer 3D printed specimen and a 25 % higher load-bearing capacity than the interstrip 3D printed specimen. The percentage difference between the experimental and simulated results for these specimens is less than 5 %, indicating good agreement. The study shows that the peak load changes with the print angle, initially decreasing from 0° to 30° and then rising from 30° to 90°, with the maximum load occurring at 90°. Specimens printed at a 30° angle exhibit the highest damage due to increased stress concentrations, while those printed at 90° experience lowest damage because of more effective stress distribution. Additionally, increasing the layer size significantly enhances peak load capacity, with larger layers improving load distribution and structural support. Ultimately, specimens with a 50 mm bond length demonstrate the highest peak load and the lowest slip, indicating superior load-bearing capacity and bond performance. In contrast, shorter bond lengths result in lower peak loads and greater slip values. In conclusion, this study provides a foundation for future research on 3DPC modeling, particularly regarding concrete interfaces.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混凝土界面对3d打印混凝土结构损伤与拉拔行为的影响
本研究考察了嵌入在3d打印混凝土(3DPC)试件中的钢筋的拔出行为。建立了包含内聚元素的有限元模型,并通过实验数据验证了该模型的有效性,以评估打印混凝土-混凝土界面对3d - pc拉拔行为的影响。详细分析了界面对3D打印试件的影响,揭示了峰值载荷和滑移行为、破坏机制和损伤准则。此外,还深入研究了界面结合强度、层带尺寸、打印角度和有效结合长度对3d打印材料拉拔行为的影响。结果表明,与铸造试样相比,3DPC的初始刚度降低,在X和Y方向上保持一致的刚度。铸型试样的承载能力比夹层3D打印试样高9.38%,比夹层3D打印试样高25%。这些试样的实验结果与模拟结果之间的百分比差异小于5%,表明很好的一致性。研究表明,峰值载荷随打印角度变化,从0°到30°开始减小,从30°到90°开始增大,最大载荷出现在90°处。由于应力集中的增加,以30°角打印的样品表现出最大的损伤,而以90°角打印的样品由于更有效的应力分布而受到最小的损伤。此外,增加层数可显著提高峰值荷载能力,更大的层数可改善荷载分布和结构支撑。最终,黏结长度为50 mm的试件表现出最高的峰值荷载和最低的滑移,表明了优越的承载能力和黏结性能。相反,较短的键长导致较低的峰值载荷和较大的滑移值。综上所述,本研究为未来3DPC建模特别是混凝土界面建模的研究奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Failure Analysis
Engineering Failure Analysis 工程技术-材料科学:表征与测试
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
956
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Failure Analysis publishes research papers describing the analysis of engineering failures and related studies. Papers relating to the structure, properties and behaviour of engineering materials are encouraged, particularly those which also involve the detailed application of materials parameters to problems in engineering structures, components and design. In addition to the area of materials engineering, the interacting fields of mechanical, manufacturing, aeronautical, civil, chemical, corrosion and design engineering are considered relevant. Activity should be directed at analysing engineering failures and carrying out research to help reduce the incidences of failures and to extend the operating horizons of engineering materials. Emphasis is placed on the mechanical properties of materials and their behaviour when influenced by structure, process and environment. Metallic, polymeric, ceramic and natural materials are all included and the application of these materials to real engineering situations should be emphasised. The use of a case-study based approach is also encouraged. Engineering Failure Analysis provides essential reference material and critical feedback into the design process thereby contributing to the prevention of engineering failures in the future. All submissions will be subject to peer review from leading experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Retraction notice to “Finite element evaluation of seismic response to RC interventions in historical masonry: Erzurum stone Granaries” [Eng. Fail. Anal. 178 (2025) 109727] Rotating bending fatigue analysis of 3D-printed PLA polymer composites: Effect of short fiber reinforcement and epoxy coating Wheel profile optimization for high-speed locomotives to suppress carbody hunting stability failure under complex wheel-rail conditions Guided wave characteristics and nondestructive testing of corrosion defects in threaded steel resin bolts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1