Influence of concrete interfaces on the damage and pull-out behavior of 3D-printed concrete structures

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Engineering Failure Analysis Pub Date : 2025-03-02 DOI:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.109470
Qamar Shahzad, Fangyuan Li
{"title":"Influence of concrete interfaces on the damage and pull-out behavior of 3D-printed concrete structures","authors":"Qamar Shahzad,&nbsp;Fangyuan Li","doi":"10.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.109470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research examines the pull-out behavior of steel reinforcement bars embedded within 3D-printed concrete (3DPC) specimens. A finite element model (FEM) incorporating cohesive elements was developed and validated through experimental data to assess the impact of printed concrete-to-concrete interfaces on the pull-out behavior of 3DPC. A detailed analysis of the interfaces’ influence on the 3D printed specimens revealed the peak load and slip behavior, failure mechanisms, and damage criteria. Additionally, a thorough investigation was conducted on how interfacial bond strength, layer and strip dimensions, print angle, and effective length of bond impact on pull-out behavior of 3DPC. The results reveal that 3DPC demonstrates reduced initial stiffness compared to cast specimens, maintaining consistent stiffness in both the X and Y directions. The mold-cast specimen demonstrates a 9.38 % higher load-bearing capacity than the interlayer 3D printed specimen and a 25 % higher load-bearing capacity than the interstrip 3D printed specimen. The percentage difference between the experimental and simulated results for these specimens is less than 5 %, indicating good agreement. The study shows that the peak load changes with the print angle, initially decreasing from 0° to 30° and then rising from 30° to 90°, with the maximum load occurring at 90°. Specimens printed at a 30° angle exhibit the highest damage due to increased stress concentrations, while those printed at 90° experience lowest damage because of more effective stress distribution. Additionally, increasing the layer size significantly enhances peak load capacity, with larger layers improving load distribution and structural support. Ultimately, specimens with a 50 mm bond length demonstrate the highest peak load and the lowest slip, indicating superior load-bearing capacity and bond performance. In contrast, shorter bond lengths result in lower peak loads and greater slip values. In conclusion, this study provides a foundation for future research on 3DPC modeling, particularly regarding concrete interfaces.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11677,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Failure Analysis","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 109470"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Failure Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350630725002110","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research examines the pull-out behavior of steel reinforcement bars embedded within 3D-printed concrete (3DPC) specimens. A finite element model (FEM) incorporating cohesive elements was developed and validated through experimental data to assess the impact of printed concrete-to-concrete interfaces on the pull-out behavior of 3DPC. A detailed analysis of the interfaces’ influence on the 3D printed specimens revealed the peak load and slip behavior, failure mechanisms, and damage criteria. Additionally, a thorough investigation was conducted on how interfacial bond strength, layer and strip dimensions, print angle, and effective length of bond impact on pull-out behavior of 3DPC. The results reveal that 3DPC demonstrates reduced initial stiffness compared to cast specimens, maintaining consistent stiffness in both the X and Y directions. The mold-cast specimen demonstrates a 9.38 % higher load-bearing capacity than the interlayer 3D printed specimen and a 25 % higher load-bearing capacity than the interstrip 3D printed specimen. The percentage difference between the experimental and simulated results for these specimens is less than 5 %, indicating good agreement. The study shows that the peak load changes with the print angle, initially decreasing from 0° to 30° and then rising from 30° to 90°, with the maximum load occurring at 90°. Specimens printed at a 30° angle exhibit the highest damage due to increased stress concentrations, while those printed at 90° experience lowest damage because of more effective stress distribution. Additionally, increasing the layer size significantly enhances peak load capacity, with larger layers improving load distribution and structural support. Ultimately, specimens with a 50 mm bond length demonstrate the highest peak load and the lowest slip, indicating superior load-bearing capacity and bond performance. In contrast, shorter bond lengths result in lower peak loads and greater slip values. In conclusion, this study provides a foundation for future research on 3DPC modeling, particularly regarding concrete interfaces.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Failure Analysis
Engineering Failure Analysis 工程技术-材料科学:表征与测试
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
956
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Failure Analysis publishes research papers describing the analysis of engineering failures and related studies. Papers relating to the structure, properties and behaviour of engineering materials are encouraged, particularly those which also involve the detailed application of materials parameters to problems in engineering structures, components and design. In addition to the area of materials engineering, the interacting fields of mechanical, manufacturing, aeronautical, civil, chemical, corrosion and design engineering are considered relevant. Activity should be directed at analysing engineering failures and carrying out research to help reduce the incidences of failures and to extend the operating horizons of engineering materials. Emphasis is placed on the mechanical properties of materials and their behaviour when influenced by structure, process and environment. Metallic, polymeric, ceramic and natural materials are all included and the application of these materials to real engineering situations should be emphasised. The use of a case-study based approach is also encouraged. Engineering Failure Analysis provides essential reference material and critical feedback into the design process thereby contributing to the prevention of engineering failures in the future. All submissions will be subject to peer review from leading experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
A physics-informed framework for feature extraction and defect segmentation in pulsed infrared thermography Failure analysis of a torsion spring: A microstructural and finite element assessment Impact-induced failure and mechanical response of rapidly solidified sealing materials for blast holes A perspective on the structural integrity of notched components through the Effective Critical Plane approach Experimental study on progressive collapse resistance of corroded RC continuous deep flexural members
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1