Kelsey L. Dowdy, Randy Long, Carla M. D'Antonio, Tom L. Dudley, Joshua P. Schimel
{"title":"Untangling Invasion to Address Restoration: Lower Nitrogen Levels Reduce Competitive Success of Arundo donax","authors":"Kelsey L. Dowdy, Randy Long, Carla M. D'Antonio, Tom L. Dudley, Joshua P. Schimel","doi":"10.1111/emr.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Riparian ecosystems in Mediterranean climates are pressured by nutrient enrichment and opportunistic plants, such as the large perennial grass <i>Arundo donax</i>. Arundo grows more with nitrogen (N) amendments and can outcompete native woody species in high-N conditions characteristic of intensive agricultural runoff, but its competitive dynamics at N levels characteristic of less intensive agriculture have not been assessed. Restoration efforts typically do not consider minimising conditions that make ‘invaders’ so successful in a given area, such as the range of upland N inputs; however, such distinctions may be important in identifying areas with higher chances of successful native plant restoration. Here, we addressed how different levels of N addition influenced competition between Arundo and a dominant native California woody species, <i>Salix lasiolepis</i> (Arroyo Willow), by simulating a post-flooding scenario: Arundo rhizomes are deposited and establish within Arroyo Willow stands and receive nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>) from agricultural runoff. We added Arundo rhizomes to established Arroyo Willows in individual pots of riparian soil (in the greenhouse), and added NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> weekly for 4 months at the following levels: no addition, low (24 g/m<sup>2</sup> year.<sup>−1</sup> N), or high (120 g/m<sup>2</sup> year.<sup>−1</sup> N). Arundo inhibited Arroyo Willow growth by 57% in high-N conditions, but did not inhibit Arroyo Willow in low- or no-N treatments. Across all treatments, Arundo had greater leaf N%, higher potential photosynthetic N use efficiency, but produced less root biomass than Arroyo Willow, suggesting that it dominated access to NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> without needing to invest in root infrastructure. Arundo had similar net assimilation of CO<sub>2</sub> (A<sub>net</sub>) as Arroyo Willow, but greater leaf biomass, increasing its photosynthetic potential. These findings suggest that upstream agricultural NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> management can either enhance or constrain Arundo success. Plant restoration practices should prioritise whole watershed management of Arundo removal areas, integrating consideration of upstream N dynamics and runoff so as to limit NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> inputs.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54325,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Management & Restoration","volume":"26 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Management & Restoration","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emr.70005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Riparian ecosystems in Mediterranean climates are pressured by nutrient enrichment and opportunistic plants, such as the large perennial grass Arundo donax. Arundo grows more with nitrogen (N) amendments and can outcompete native woody species in high-N conditions characteristic of intensive agricultural runoff, but its competitive dynamics at N levels characteristic of less intensive agriculture have not been assessed. Restoration efforts typically do not consider minimising conditions that make ‘invaders’ so successful in a given area, such as the range of upland N inputs; however, such distinctions may be important in identifying areas with higher chances of successful native plant restoration. Here, we addressed how different levels of N addition influenced competition between Arundo and a dominant native California woody species, Salix lasiolepis (Arroyo Willow), by simulating a post-flooding scenario: Arundo rhizomes are deposited and establish within Arroyo Willow stands and receive nitrate (NO3−) from agricultural runoff. We added Arundo rhizomes to established Arroyo Willows in individual pots of riparian soil (in the greenhouse), and added NO3− weekly for 4 months at the following levels: no addition, low (24 g/m2 year.−1 N), or high (120 g/m2 year.−1 N). Arundo inhibited Arroyo Willow growth by 57% in high-N conditions, but did not inhibit Arroyo Willow in low- or no-N treatments. Across all treatments, Arundo had greater leaf N%, higher potential photosynthetic N use efficiency, but produced less root biomass than Arroyo Willow, suggesting that it dominated access to NO3− without needing to invest in root infrastructure. Arundo had similar net assimilation of CO2 (Anet) as Arroyo Willow, but greater leaf biomass, increasing its photosynthetic potential. These findings suggest that upstream agricultural NO3− management can either enhance or constrain Arundo success. Plant restoration practices should prioritise whole watershed management of Arundo removal areas, integrating consideration of upstream N dynamics and runoff so as to limit NO3− inputs.
期刊介绍:
Ecological Management & Restoration is a peer-reviewed journal with the dual aims of (i) reporting the latest science to assist ecologically appropriate management and restoration actions and (ii) providing a forum for reporting on these actions. Guided by an editorial board made up of researchers and practitioners, EMR seeks features, topical opinion pieces, research reports, short notes and project summaries applicable to Australasian ecosystems to encourage more regionally-appropriate management. Where relevant, contributions should draw on international science and practice and highlight any relevance to the global challenge of integrating biodiversity conservation in a rapidly changing world.
Topic areas:
Improved management and restoration of plant communities, fauna and habitat; coastal, marine and riparian zones; restoration ethics and philosophy; planning; monitoring and assessment; policy and legislation; landscape pattern and design; integrated ecosystems management; socio-economic issues and solutions; techniques and methodology; threatened species; genetic issues; indigenous land management; weeds and feral animal control; landscape arts and aesthetics; education and communication; community involvement.