The Effects of Disease-Modifying Therapies on Optic Nerve Degeneration in Multiple Sclerosis

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY European Journal of Neurology Pub Date : 2025-03-06 DOI:10.1111/ene.70081
Xia Zhang, Shuang Song, Bo Chen, Letizia Leocani, Xinyu Zhao, Yong Zhong, Marco Pisa, Srilakshmi M. Sharma
{"title":"The Effects of Disease-Modifying Therapies on Optic Nerve Degeneration in Multiple Sclerosis","authors":"Xia Zhang,&nbsp;Shuang Song,&nbsp;Bo Chen,&nbsp;Letizia Leocani,&nbsp;Xinyu Zhao,&nbsp;Yong Zhong,&nbsp;Marco Pisa,&nbsp;Srilakshmi M. Sharma","doi":"10.1111/ene.70081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thinning are used as markers of subclinical retinal degeneration to evaluate the effect of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) on disease progression in clinical trials of multiple sclerosis (MS). This study aimed to assess the available evidence regarding the effects of DMTs on retinal thinning in people with MS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Databases were searched for studies reporting longitudinal optical coherence tomography (OCT)-derived annualized RNFL and GCIPL thinning in patients receiving DMTs treatment. The standardized mean differences (Hedges g) of RNFL and GCIPL thickness between the baseline and follow-up were used as the primary effect size measure. DMTs were divided into moderate (M-DMTs) and high (H-DMTs) efficacy therapies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-one studies including 2158 patients and 3685 eyes were included. Overall, significant annualized RNFL (<i>g</i> = −0.6715, <i>p =</i> 0.0077) and GCIPL (<i>g</i> = −0.31, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001) thinning was observed at follow-up compared with baseline. Annualized RNFL thinning was only significant in the M-DMTs group (<i>g</i> = −0.6992, <i>p</i> = 0.0243). Annualized GCIPL thinning was significant in both M-DMTs (<i>g</i> = −0.38, <i>p =</i> 0.0006) and H-DMTs group (<i>g</i> = −0.19, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001) but was significantly greater in the M-DMTs group compared with the H-DMTs group (<i>g</i> = −0.20, <i>p =</i> 0.0017). There was no difference in annualized GCIPL or RNFL thinning between RRMS and PMS, or between RRMS with and without ON history.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>High-DMTs are more effective in reducing longitudinal thinning of RNFL and GCIPL compared with M-DMTs. GCIPL thinning could serve as a sensitive predictor for the surveillance of optic nerve degeneration and the assessment of DMT efficacy for both RRMS and PMS.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11954,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Neurology","volume":"32 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ene.70081","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ene.70081","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thinning are used as markers of subclinical retinal degeneration to evaluate the effect of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) on disease progression in clinical trials of multiple sclerosis (MS). This study aimed to assess the available evidence regarding the effects of DMTs on retinal thinning in people with MS.

Methods

Databases were searched for studies reporting longitudinal optical coherence tomography (OCT)-derived annualized RNFL and GCIPL thinning in patients receiving DMTs treatment. The standardized mean differences (Hedges g) of RNFL and GCIPL thickness between the baseline and follow-up were used as the primary effect size measure. DMTs were divided into moderate (M-DMTs) and high (H-DMTs) efficacy therapies.

Results

Twenty-one studies including 2158 patients and 3685 eyes were included. Overall, significant annualized RNFL (g = −0.6715, p = 0.0077) and GCIPL (g = −0.31, p < 0.0001) thinning was observed at follow-up compared with baseline. Annualized RNFL thinning was only significant in the M-DMTs group (g = −0.6992, p = 0.0243). Annualized GCIPL thinning was significant in both M-DMTs (g = −0.38, p = 0.0006) and H-DMTs group (g = −0.19, p < 0.0001) but was significantly greater in the M-DMTs group compared with the H-DMTs group (g = −0.20, p = 0.0017). There was no difference in annualized GCIPL or RNFL thinning between RRMS and PMS, or between RRMS with and without ON history.

Conclusions

High-DMTs are more effective in reducing longitudinal thinning of RNFL and GCIPL compared with M-DMTs. GCIPL thinning could serve as a sensitive predictor for the surveillance of optic nerve degeneration and the assessment of DMT efficacy for both RRMS and PMS.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善疾病治疗对多发性硬化症视神经变性的影响
在多发性硬化症(MS)的临床试验中,视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)和神经节细胞-内丛状层(GCIPL)变薄被用作亚临床视网膜变性的标志物,以评估疾病改善疗法(DMTs)对疾病进展的影响。本研究旨在评估关于dmt对ms患者视网膜变薄影响的现有证据。方法检索数据库中关于接受dmt治疗患者的纵向光学相干断层扫描(OCT)衍生的年化RNFL和GCIPL变薄的研究。RNFL和GCIPL厚度的标准化平均差异(Hedges g)被用作基线和随访之间的主要效应量测量。dmt分为中等(m - dmt)和高(h - dmt)疗效治疗。结果纳入21项研究,2158例患者,3685只眼。总体而言,与基线相比,随访时观察到显著的年化RNFL (g = - 0.6715, p = 0.0077)和GCIPL (g = - 0.31, p < 0.0001)变薄。年化RNFL变薄仅在m - dmt组有统计学意义(g = - 0.6992, p = 0.0243)。年化GCIPL变薄在m - dmt组(g = - 0.38, p = 0.0006)和h - dmt组(g = - 0.19, p < 0.0001)中都很显著,但m - dmt组比h - dmt组更显著(g = - 0.20, p = 0.0017)。在年化GCIPL或RNFL变薄方面,RRMS和PMS、有和没有ON病史的RRMS之间没有差异。结论与M-DMTs相比,高dmts能更有效地减少RNFL和GCIPL的纵向变薄。GCIPL变薄可作为视神经退化监测和评估DMT对RRMS和PMS疗效的敏感预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Neurology
European Journal of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
2.00%
发文量
418
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Neurology is the official journal of the European Academy of Neurology and covers all areas of clinical and basic research in neurology, including pre-clinical research of immediate translational value for new potential treatments. Emphasis is placed on major diseases of large clinical and socio-economic importance (dementia, stroke, epilepsy, headache, multiple sclerosis, movement disorders, and infectious diseases).
期刊最新文献
Gene–Environment Interactions for Alzheimer's Disease Pathology in Cognitively Normal Adults: The CABLE Study Mortality From Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis in Finland 1987–2022 Older Adults, Anti-Amyloid Therapy, and Frailty: What Oncology Can Teach Us Palliative Care in Europe: Safeguarding Compassion Amidst Changing End-of-Life Policies and Expanding Access to Medically Assisted Dying Position Statement on behalf of the European Academy of Neurology, the European Federation of Neurological Associations and OneNeurology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1