Eduard Tiozzo, Lance Reccoppa, Gemayaret Alvarez, Tricia A Prince, Andrew L Sherman, Leslie Morse, Kerstin Yu, Diana Molinares
{"title":"Interview Type and Signal Preferences of Interview Applicants to a Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Residency Program: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Eduard Tiozzo, Lance Reccoppa, Gemayaret Alvarez, Tricia A Prince, Andrew L Sherman, Leslie Morse, Kerstin Yu, Diana Molinares","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>This study examined preferences in interview type and signals among applicants interviewed by a non-surgical residency program during the 2023-2024 application cycle. A Qualtrics survey was sent to 88 interview applicants of a university-based Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R) residency program. Main outcomes included interview type preference the applicants had with our PM&R program only and their interview type preference with multiple PM&R programs, and preferred number of signals. A resulting 38% of applicants completed the survey. The responders (n = 33) had a similar sex and race distribution compared to all interview applicants. Regarding preferred interview type for our single program, 42% favored in-person, while 40% favored virtual. Those geographically closer to our program had similar interview-type preferences compared to participants from other regions. For multiple program interviews, 52% preferred hybrid, 24% virtual, and 15% in-person format. For signal preferences, 70% of the applicants preferred more than five program signals. The program signaling preference was similar between those with more versus less interviews, for which the cut-off of 10 interviews during the 2023-2024 application cycle was used. Overall, respondents did not have a preferred interview format with a single program, strongly preferred the hybrid format when considering multiple programs, and preferred more program signals.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002722","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract: This study examined preferences in interview type and signals among applicants interviewed by a non-surgical residency program during the 2023-2024 application cycle. A Qualtrics survey was sent to 88 interview applicants of a university-based Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R) residency program. Main outcomes included interview type preference the applicants had with our PM&R program only and their interview type preference with multiple PM&R programs, and preferred number of signals. A resulting 38% of applicants completed the survey. The responders (n = 33) had a similar sex and race distribution compared to all interview applicants. Regarding preferred interview type for our single program, 42% favored in-person, while 40% favored virtual. Those geographically closer to our program had similar interview-type preferences compared to participants from other regions. For multiple program interviews, 52% preferred hybrid, 24% virtual, and 15% in-person format. For signal preferences, 70% of the applicants preferred more than five program signals. The program signaling preference was similar between those with more versus less interviews, for which the cut-off of 10 interviews during the 2023-2024 application cycle was used. Overall, respondents did not have a preferred interview format with a single program, strongly preferred the hybrid format when considering multiple programs, and preferred more program signals.
期刊介绍:
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals.
Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).