Psycholinguistic tests predict real-world drug name confusion error rates: a cross-sectional experimental study.

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Quality & Safety Pub Date : 2025-10-17 DOI:10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017688
Bruce L Lambert, Scott Ryan Schroeder, William L Galanter, Gordon D Schiff, Allen J Vaida, Michael J Gaunt, Michelle Bryson Opfermann, Christine Rash Foanio, Suzanne Falck, Nicole Mirea
{"title":"Psycholinguistic tests predict real-world drug name confusion error rates: a cross-sectional experimental study.","authors":"Bruce L Lambert, Scott Ryan Schroeder, William L Galanter, Gordon D Schiff, Allen J Vaida, Michael J Gaunt, Michelle Bryson Opfermann, Christine Rash Foanio, Suzanne Falck, Nicole Mirea","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Wrong-drug medication errors are common. Regulators screen drug names for confusability, but screening methods lack empirical validation. Previous work showed that psycholinguistic tests on <i>pairs</i> of drug names are associated with real-world error rates in chain pharmacies. However, regulators evaluate <i>individual</i> names not <i>pairs</i>, and individual names can be confused with multiple drugs (eg, hydroxyzine with hydralazine but also hydrocet, thorazine, hydrochlorothiazide). This study examines whether an individual drug name's performance on psycholinguistic tests correlates with that name's sum total error rate in the real world.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nineteen pharmacists and 18 pharmacy technicians completed memory and perception tests assessing confusability of 77 drug names. Tests involved presenting a drug name to participants in conditions that hindered their ability to see, hear or remember the name. Participants typed the name they perceived and selected that name from a menu of alternatives. Error rates on the tests were assessed in relation to real-world rates, as reported by the patient safety organisation associated with a national pharmacy chain in the USA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean error rate on the psycholinguistic tests was positively correlated with the log-adjusted real-world error rate (r=0.50, p<0.0001). Linear and mixed effects logistic regression analyses indicated that the lab-measured error rates significantly predicted the real-world error rates and vice versa.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lab-based psycholinguistic tests are associated with real-world drug name confusion error rates. Previous work showed that such tests were associated with error rates of specific look-alike sound-alike <i>pairs</i>, and the current work showed that lab-based error rates are also associated with an <i>individual</i> drug's <i>overall error rate</i>. Taken together, these studies validate the use of psycholinguistic tests in assessing the confusability of proposed drug names.</p>","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":" ","pages":"729-736"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Quality & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017688","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Wrong-drug medication errors are common. Regulators screen drug names for confusability, but screening methods lack empirical validation. Previous work showed that psycholinguistic tests on pairs of drug names are associated with real-world error rates in chain pharmacies. However, regulators evaluate individual names not pairs, and individual names can be confused with multiple drugs (eg, hydroxyzine with hydralazine but also hydrocet, thorazine, hydrochlorothiazide). This study examines whether an individual drug name's performance on psycholinguistic tests correlates with that name's sum total error rate in the real world.

Methods: Nineteen pharmacists and 18 pharmacy technicians completed memory and perception tests assessing confusability of 77 drug names. Tests involved presenting a drug name to participants in conditions that hindered their ability to see, hear or remember the name. Participants typed the name they perceived and selected that name from a menu of alternatives. Error rates on the tests were assessed in relation to real-world rates, as reported by the patient safety organisation associated with a national pharmacy chain in the USA.

Results: Mean error rate on the psycholinguistic tests was positively correlated with the log-adjusted real-world error rate (r=0.50, p<0.0001). Linear and mixed effects logistic regression analyses indicated that the lab-measured error rates significantly predicted the real-world error rates and vice versa.

Conclusions: Lab-based psycholinguistic tests are associated with real-world drug name confusion error rates. Previous work showed that such tests were associated with error rates of specific look-alike sound-alike pairs, and the current work showed that lab-based error rates are also associated with an individual drug's overall error rate. Taken together, these studies validate the use of psycholinguistic tests in assessing the confusability of proposed drug names.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心理语言学测试预测真实世界药物名称混淆错误率:一项横断面实验研究。
背景:用药错误是常见的。监管机构筛选药品名称以避免混淆,但筛选方法缺乏经验验证。先前的研究表明,对药物名称的心理语言学测试与连锁药店的现实世界错误率有关。然而,监管机构评估的是单个名称,而不是成对名称,并且单个名称可能与多种药物混淆(例如,羟嗪与肼嗪,但也有氢塞特、噻嗪、氢氯噻嗪)。这项研究考察了单个药物名称在心理语言学测试中的表现是否与该名称在现实世界中的总错误率相关。方法:19名药剂师和18名药学技术人员完成了77种药品名称的记忆和知觉测试,评估了混淆性。测试包括在阻碍参与者看到、听到或记住药物名称的条件下向他们展示药物名称。参与者输入他们感知到的名字,并从备选菜单中选择这个名字。根据与美国一家全国连锁药店有关的患者安全组织的报告,评估了与实际情况相关的测试错误率。结果:心理语言测试的平均错误率与对数校正后的真实世界错误率呈正相关(r=0.50, p)。结论:实验室心理语言测试与真实世界药品名称混淆错误率相关。先前的研究表明,这种测试与特定的相似对的错误率有关,而目前的研究表明,基于实验室的错误率也与单个药物的总体错误率有关。综上所述,这些研究验证了心理语言学测试在评估拟议药物名称的混淆性方面的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Quality & Safety
BMJ Quality & Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
104
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Quality & Safety (previously Quality & Safety in Health Care) is an international peer review publication providing research, opinions, debates and reviews for academics, clinicians and healthcare managers focused on the quality and safety of health care and the science of improvement. The journal receives approximately 1000 manuscripts a year and has an acceptance rate for original research of 12%. Time from submission to first decision averages 22 days and accepted articles are typically published online within 20 days. Its current impact factor is 3.281.
期刊最新文献
Does bypassing nearby hospitals for high-quality care reduce case fatality among inpatients who had a stroke? A retrospective study of 328 206 cases. AI mirage: medical algorithms and the vanishing autopsy. Cocreation and codesign in maternal health: processes, outcomes and implementation challenges. Understanding patient safety during earthquakes: a phenomenological study of disaster response. Investigators are human too: outcome bias and perceptions of individual culpability in patient safety incident investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1