Agomelatine as adjunctive therapy with SSRIs or SNRIs for major depressive disorder: a multicentre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMC Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1186/s12916-025-03951-0
Yumeng Ju, Wenwen Ou, Haoran Chen, Limin Yang, Yan Long, Hui Liang, Zhenman Xi, Mei Huang, Wentao Chen, Guanyi Lv, Fangzhou Shao, Bangshan Liu, Jin Liu, Zexuan Li, Mei Liao, Weiye Liang, Zhijian Yao, Yan Zhang, Lingjiang Li
{"title":"Agomelatine as adjunctive therapy with SSRIs or SNRIs for major depressive disorder: a multicentre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.","authors":"Yumeng Ju, Wenwen Ou, Haoran Chen, Limin Yang, Yan Long, Hui Liang, Zhenman Xi, Mei Huang, Wentao Chen, Guanyi Lv, Fangzhou Shao, Bangshan Liu, Jin Liu, Zexuan Li, Mei Liao, Weiye Liang, Zhijian Yao, Yan Zhang, Lingjiang Li","doi":"10.1186/s12916-025-03951-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In general, traditional antidepressants often have limited efficacy in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Agomelatine, as an antidepressant with a different mechanism of action, might have adjunctive effects on traditional antidepressants. This study aimed to investigate the augmentation effect of agomelatine versus placebo in treating MDD patients who failed to respond to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an 8-week, multi-centred, double-blinded, randomized, and placebo-controlled trial. Participants diagnosed with MDD and demonstrated inadequate response to SSRI or SNRI lasting at least 2 weeks were randomly allocated to receive either agomelatine or placebo in conjunction with SSRIs or SNRIs. The 17 items of the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-17) were employed to assess depression severity. The primary outcome is the total score of HAMD-17 at week 8. Secondary outcomes included HAMD-17 scores at weeks 2 and 4 and clinical remission and response over 8 weeks. Adverse events (AEs) reported in both groups were recorded. A linear mixed model was established for both primary and secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 123 eligible participants were included, among which 60 were randomized into the agomelatine group, and 63 were randomized into the placebo group. The between-group difference in HAMD-17 score reduction from baseline to week 8 was not significant (difference = - 0.12, 95% CI = - 3.94 to 3.70, P = 0.90; Cohen's d = 0.022). In addition, we did not observe significant differences between the two treatment groups for secondary outcomes, including response remission, and AEs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study did not obtain significant findings in favour of the augmentation effect of agomelation for MDD patients. However, agomelatine was generally well tolerated and demonstrated a favourable safety profile when used in combination with SSRIs and SNRIs.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( https://clinicaltrials.gov ), the registration number is NCT04589143.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"137"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11881269/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-03951-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In general, traditional antidepressants often have limited efficacy in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Agomelatine, as an antidepressant with a different mechanism of action, might have adjunctive effects on traditional antidepressants. This study aimed to investigate the augmentation effect of agomelatine versus placebo in treating MDD patients who failed to respond to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs).

Methods: This is an 8-week, multi-centred, double-blinded, randomized, and placebo-controlled trial. Participants diagnosed with MDD and demonstrated inadequate response to SSRI or SNRI lasting at least 2 weeks were randomly allocated to receive either agomelatine or placebo in conjunction with SSRIs or SNRIs. The 17 items of the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-17) were employed to assess depression severity. The primary outcome is the total score of HAMD-17 at week 8. Secondary outcomes included HAMD-17 scores at weeks 2 and 4 and clinical remission and response over 8 weeks. Adverse events (AEs) reported in both groups were recorded. A linear mixed model was established for both primary and secondary outcomes.

Results: A total of 123 eligible participants were included, among which 60 were randomized into the agomelatine group, and 63 were randomized into the placebo group. The between-group difference in HAMD-17 score reduction from baseline to week 8 was not significant (difference = - 0.12, 95% CI = - 3.94 to 3.70, P = 0.90; Cohen's d = 0.022). In addition, we did not observe significant differences between the two treatment groups for secondary outcomes, including response remission, and AEs.

Conclusions: This study did not obtain significant findings in favour of the augmentation effect of agomelation for MDD patients. However, agomelatine was generally well tolerated and demonstrated a favourable safety profile when used in combination with SSRIs and SNRIs.

Trial registration: This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( https://clinicaltrials.gov ), the registration number is NCT04589143.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿戈美拉汀与SSRIs或SNRIs联合治疗重度抑郁症:一项多中心、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验
背景:一般来说,传统抗抑郁药对重度抑郁症(MDD)患者的疗效有限。阿戈美拉汀作为一种具有不同作用机制的抗抑郁药,可能对传统抗抑郁药具有辅助作用。本研究旨在探讨阿戈美拉汀与安慰剂在治疗选择性5 -羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)和5 -羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRIs)无效的重度抑郁症患者中的增强作用。方法:这是一项为期8周、多中心、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照的试验。被诊断为重度抑郁症且对SSRI或SNRI反应不足且持续至少2周的参与者被随机分配接受阿戈美拉汀或安慰剂与SSRIs或SNRIs联合治疗。采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD-17)的17个条目对抑郁程度进行评估。主要终点是HAMD-17在第8周的总得分。次要结局包括HAMD-17评分在第2周和第4周,临床缓解和反应超过8周。记录两组报告的不良事件(ae)。主要和次要结果均建立了线性混合模型。结果:共纳入123名符合条件的受试者,其中60人随机分为阿戈美拉汀组,63人随机分为安慰剂组。从基线到第8周HAMD-17评分降低的组间差异无统计学意义(差异= - 0.12,95% CI = - 3.94 ~ 3.70, P = 0.90;Cohen’s d = 0.022)。此外,我们没有观察到两个治疗组在次要结局方面的显著差异,包括缓解和不良反应。结论:本研究未获得支持阿戈松对重度抑郁症患者增强作用的显著发现。然而,阿戈美拉汀通常耐受性良好,并且在与SSRIs和SNRIs联合使用时显示出良好的安全性。试验注册:本试验在ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov)上注册,注册号为NCT04589143。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
期刊最新文献
Development of a novel prognostic assessment tool for recurrent respiratory papillomatosis. Detection rate and mutational landscape in extracranial arteriovenous malformations: a cohort study. Infant subcortical brain volumes associated with maternal obesity and diabetes: a large multicohort human study. Clinical benefit of tenecteplase despite failed recanalization in late-window ischemic stroke: a post hoc analysis of the TRACE-3 trial. Genetic predisposition to high BMI, ultra-processed food consumptions in childhood, and adiposity in young adulthood: a 17-year prospective cohort study of 3061 individuals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1