{"title":"Evaluation of the safety of doxapram in premature neonates born before 28 weeks of gestation.","authors":"Lauren Saade, Elodie Zana-Taïeb, Pierre-Henri Jarreau, Valérie Biran, Mouna Loukil, Ludovic Tréluyer, Héloïse Torchin","doi":"10.1007/s00431-025-06054-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To assess the short-term safety of doxapram for treating apnea of prematurity. This is a retrospective and bicenter study. Eligible children were born before 28 weeks of gestation from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2021. The association between doxapram treatment and gastrointestinal events was assessed with logistic regression models with adjustment for the main confounding factors: center, sex, intra-uterine growth restriction and gestational age. The main outcome measures are gastrointestinal events (necrotizing enterocolitis or feeding intolerance), the adverse effects of doxapram most frequently reported in the literature. The population consisted of 268 children; 113 (42.2%) received doxapram. As compared with children who did not receive doxapram, those who did had lower gestational age at birth (25.4 vs 26.3 weeks), lower birth weight and more evidence of greater clinical respiratory severity. Doxapram treatment was not associated with increased risk of gastrointestinal events (30.1% and 29.7% in the treated and untreated groups; odds ratio 1.3, 95% CI 0.7-2.4, p = 0.43). More children in the treated than untreated group had high blood pressure (25.7% vs 6.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In children born before 28 weeks of gestation, doxapram treatment for apnea of prematurity was not associated with the occurrence of gastrointestinal events.</p><p><strong>What is known: </strong>• Doxapram is a well-known second-line treatment for apnea of prematurity. It is a central nervous stimulant that can be used in refractory apnea of prematurity despite continuous positive airway pressure and optimal caffeine therapy. However, its use varies among countries and centers, probably because of suspected adverse effects. Studies suggest that this drug may have potential side effects such as digestive events (necrotizing enterocolitis).</p><p><strong>What is new: </strong>• We present reassuring data on the digestive safety of doxapram. Use of this drug was not associated with increased rates of digestive events in preterm infants born before 28 weeks of gestation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11997,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"184 3","pages":"222"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-025-06054-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To assess the short-term safety of doxapram for treating apnea of prematurity. This is a retrospective and bicenter study. Eligible children were born before 28 weeks of gestation from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2021. The association between doxapram treatment and gastrointestinal events was assessed with logistic regression models with adjustment for the main confounding factors: center, sex, intra-uterine growth restriction and gestational age. The main outcome measures are gastrointestinal events (necrotizing enterocolitis or feeding intolerance), the adverse effects of doxapram most frequently reported in the literature. The population consisted of 268 children; 113 (42.2%) received doxapram. As compared with children who did not receive doxapram, those who did had lower gestational age at birth (25.4 vs 26.3 weeks), lower birth weight and more evidence of greater clinical respiratory severity. Doxapram treatment was not associated with increased risk of gastrointestinal events (30.1% and 29.7% in the treated and untreated groups; odds ratio 1.3, 95% CI 0.7-2.4, p = 0.43). More children in the treated than untreated group had high blood pressure (25.7% vs 6.5%).
Conclusion: In children born before 28 weeks of gestation, doxapram treatment for apnea of prematurity was not associated with the occurrence of gastrointestinal events.
What is known: • Doxapram is a well-known second-line treatment for apnea of prematurity. It is a central nervous stimulant that can be used in refractory apnea of prematurity despite continuous positive airway pressure and optimal caffeine therapy. However, its use varies among countries and centers, probably because of suspected adverse effects. Studies suggest that this drug may have potential side effects such as digestive events (necrotizing enterocolitis).
What is new: • We present reassuring data on the digestive safety of doxapram. Use of this drug was not associated with increased rates of digestive events in preterm infants born before 28 weeks of gestation.
评价多西普兰治疗早产儿呼吸暂停的短期安全性。这是一项回顾性的双中心研究。在2020年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间,符合条件的儿童在怀孕28周之前出生。采用logistic回归模型,对中心、性别、宫内生长限制和胎龄等主要混杂因素进行校正,评估多西普兰治疗与胃肠道事件的相关性。主要的结局指标是胃肠道事件(坏死性小肠结肠炎或喂养不耐受),文献中最常报道的是多西普兰的不良反应。人口包括268名儿童;113例(42.2%)接受doxapram治疗。与未接受doxapram的儿童相比,接受doxapram的儿童出生时胎龄更低(25.4周vs 26.3周),出生体重更低,临床呼吸严重程度更高的证据更多。Doxapram治疗与胃肠道事件风险增加无关(治疗组和未治疗组分别为30.1%和29.7%;优势比1.3,95% CI 0.7-2.4, p = 0.43)。治疗组的儿童高血压发生率高于未治疗组(25.7% vs 6.5%)。结论:在妊娠28周前出生的儿童中,多西普兰治疗早产呼吸暂停与胃肠道事件的发生无关。已知情况:•Doxapram是众所周知的早产儿呼吸暂停的二线治疗药物。它是一种中枢神经兴奋剂,可用于难治性早产儿呼吸暂停,尽管持续气道正压和最佳咖啡因治疗。然而,它的使用因国家和中心而异,可能是因为怀疑有副作用。研究表明,这种药物可能有潜在的副作用,如消化事件(坏死性小肠结肠炎)。新内容:•我们提出了关于doxapram消化安全性的可靠数据。使用这种药物与28周前出生的早产儿的消化事件发生率增加无关。
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Pediatrics (EJPE) is a leading peer-reviewed medical journal which covers the entire field of pediatrics. The editors encourage authors to submit original articles, reviews, short communications, and correspondence on all relevant themes and topics.
EJPE is particularly committed to the publication of articles on important new clinical research that will have an immediate impact on clinical pediatric practice. The editorial office very much welcomes ideas for publications, whether individual articles or article series, that fit this goal and is always willing to address inquiries from authors regarding potential submissions. Invited review articles on clinical pediatrics that provide comprehensive coverage of a subject of importance are also regularly commissioned.
The short publication time reflects both the commitment of the editors and publishers and their passion for new developments in the field of pediatrics.
EJPE is active on social media (@EurJPediatrics) and we invite you to participate.
EJPE is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP) and publishes guidelines and statements in cooperation with the EAP.