Provider Treatment and Sexual Health Outcomes for Black Women: Historical Context and Post-pandemic Access to Reproductive Resources.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1007/s40615-025-02323-x
Marquitta Dorsey, Jordan Freeman, Alejandra Priede, Dione King, Tyriesa Howard, Amunn Jaffery
{"title":"Provider Treatment and Sexual Health Outcomes for Black Women: Historical Context and Post-pandemic Access to Reproductive Resources.","authors":"Marquitta Dorsey, Jordan Freeman, Alejandra Priede, Dione King, Tyriesa Howard, Amunn Jaffery","doi":"10.1007/s40615-025-02323-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During the COVID-19 quarantine, the insufficient prioritization of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) resources exacerbated health disparities experienced by young Black women in the post-pandemic period. The historical legacy of medical treatment of Black women persists within current systems of care. In this study, we use the biopsychosocial framework to investigate perceived healthcare treatment and barriers to accessing SRH resources for Black women. We aim to understand how perceived provider treatment impacts SRH experiences and which experiences were perceived as a barrier to accessing SRH resources. Using a cross-sectional design, Qualtrics Panel participants, between ages 18 and 29 years, who identify as Black/African American and female, and living in the USA responded to a sexual health questionnaire. Results from T-test, chi-squared test, and logistic regression models indicate that perceptions of poor provider treatment are associated with poorer SRH experiences, with decreased odds of receiving a prescription for a birth control method (CI 0.913-0.978); receiving a check-up or medical test related to using birth control (CI 0.93-0.997); receiving counseling or information about birth control (CI 0.917-0.983); and asking a question about whether the participant wants to become pregnant in the next year (CI 0.900-0.97). Sexual health advocates should focus on marginalized groups accessing SRH resources. These groups experienced exacerbated sexual health disparities due to treatment delays during COVID-related quarantine orders. Social work and public health researchers should investigate how state and federal policies can prioritize equitable treatment for those most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic in a post-pandemic era.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":" ","pages":"1165-1176"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-025-02323-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the COVID-19 quarantine, the insufficient prioritization of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) resources exacerbated health disparities experienced by young Black women in the post-pandemic period. The historical legacy of medical treatment of Black women persists within current systems of care. In this study, we use the biopsychosocial framework to investigate perceived healthcare treatment and barriers to accessing SRH resources for Black women. We aim to understand how perceived provider treatment impacts SRH experiences and which experiences were perceived as a barrier to accessing SRH resources. Using a cross-sectional design, Qualtrics Panel participants, between ages 18 and 29 years, who identify as Black/African American and female, and living in the USA responded to a sexual health questionnaire. Results from T-test, chi-squared test, and logistic regression models indicate that perceptions of poor provider treatment are associated with poorer SRH experiences, with decreased odds of receiving a prescription for a birth control method (CI 0.913-0.978); receiving a check-up or medical test related to using birth control (CI 0.93-0.997); receiving counseling or information about birth control (CI 0.917-0.983); and asking a question about whether the participant wants to become pregnant in the next year (CI 0.900-0.97). Sexual health advocates should focus on marginalized groups accessing SRH resources. These groups experienced exacerbated sexual health disparities due to treatment delays during COVID-related quarantine orders. Social work and public health researchers should investigate how state and federal policies can prioritize equitable treatment for those most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic in a post-pandemic era.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
黑人妇女的提供者治疗和性健康结果:历史背景和大流行后获得生殖资源。
在COVID-19隔离期间,性健康和生殖健康(SRH)资源的优先次序不足,加剧了年轻黑人女性在大流行后时期经历的健康差距。黑人妇女医疗的历史遗产在目前的医疗体系中仍然存在。在本研究中,我们使用生物心理社会框架来调查黑人妇女获得性健康和生殖健康资源的感知保健治疗和障碍。我们的目标是了解感知提供者治疗如何影响性生殖健康体验,以及哪些体验被视为获得性生殖健康资源的障碍。使用横断面设计,质量小组参与者,年龄在18至29岁之间,确定为黑人/非裔美国人和女性,居住在美国,回答了性健康问卷。t检验、卡方检验和logistic回归模型的结果表明,对提供者治疗不良的看法与较差的性生殖健康经历相关,接受节育方法处方的几率降低(CI 0.913-0.978);接受与使用节育有关的检查或医学测试(可信区间0.93-0.997);接受避孕咨询或信息(CI 0.917-0.983);并询问参与者是否想在明年怀孕(CI 0.900-0.97)。性健康倡导者应把重点放在获得性健康和生殖健康资源的边缘群体。由于在与covid相关的隔离令期间治疗延误,这些群体的性健康差距加剧。社会工作和公共卫生研究人员应该调查州和联邦政策如何在大流行后时代优先考虑受COVID-19大流行影响最严重的人的公平治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.
期刊最新文献
Correction: The Role of Physical Activity on Quality of Life Among Breast Cancer Survivors in the Black Women's Health Study. Correction: Health Care Utilization and Patient-Provider Racial/Ethnic Concordance Among Asian American Subgroups. Associating Race, Income, and Discrimination with COVID-19 Vaccine Status, Hesitancy, and Access in the United States: A Cross-sectional Study. Non-Caucasian Race/Ethnicity Predisposes to Unfavorable Stage and Grade at Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Diagnosis. Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors of Hypertension Among Middle-Aged and Older Tribal Adults-Evidence from Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1