Stent-induced hypersensitivity leading to refractory in-stent restenosis: a case report.

IF 0.8 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Medical Case Reports Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1186/s13256-025-05122-4
Menghuai Ma, Jiong Tang
{"title":"Stent-induced hypersensitivity leading to refractory in-stent restenosis: a case report.","authors":"Menghuai Ma, Jiong Tang","doi":"10.1186/s13256-025-05122-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Even in the era of new-generation drug-eluting stents, in-stent restenosis remains a common and challenging problem of percutaneous coronary intervention. Among the many factors that contribute to in-stent restenosis, stent-related hypersensitivity is relatively rare, but may be a significant trigger of chronic refractory in-stent restenosis. Nevertheless, it is difficult to diagnose and assess the stent-related hypersensitivity, and there is no standardized treatment strategy.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>We present the case of a 63-year-old Chinese female who experienced refractory in-stent restenosis following the successful implantation of platinum chromium everolimus-eluting stents in the left main, left anterior descending and left circumflex artery. Although the cardiovascular risk factors were well-controlled, the patient developed four episodes of acute myocardial infarction with in-stent restenosis within 1 year. Intravascular ultrasound revealed diffuse neointimal hyperplasia in the in-stent restenosis lesion, and the blood tests showed no sign of systemic inflammation or infection. Thus, we speculated that the cause of refractory in-stent restenosis was stent-mediated hypersensitivity. Initially, the in-stent restenosis was treated with paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty, and only mild neointimal hyperplasia was observed on intravascular ultrasound 3 months after paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty. However, the paclitaxel-coated balloon could not prevent in-stent restenosis recurrence, and she eventually underwent coronary artery bypass grafting. After over 2 years of follow-up, her cardiac function had significantly improved, and the bridging vessels remained patent, as confirmed by computed tomography angiography.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When encountering refractory in-stent restenosis, physicians should consider the potential for stent-associated hypersensitivity. Since there may be difficulty in obtaining histopathological examination of restenotic vessels, intravascular imaging can be instrumental in detecting neointimal hyperplasia and diagnosing stent allergy. Coronary artery bypass grafting may be a reasonable treatment for patients with stent allergy; further clinical research is required to explore the optimal treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":16236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Case Reports","volume":"19 1","pages":"96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11881395/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-025-05122-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Even in the era of new-generation drug-eluting stents, in-stent restenosis remains a common and challenging problem of percutaneous coronary intervention. Among the many factors that contribute to in-stent restenosis, stent-related hypersensitivity is relatively rare, but may be a significant trigger of chronic refractory in-stent restenosis. Nevertheless, it is difficult to diagnose and assess the stent-related hypersensitivity, and there is no standardized treatment strategy.

Case presentation: We present the case of a 63-year-old Chinese female who experienced refractory in-stent restenosis following the successful implantation of platinum chromium everolimus-eluting stents in the left main, left anterior descending and left circumflex artery. Although the cardiovascular risk factors were well-controlled, the patient developed four episodes of acute myocardial infarction with in-stent restenosis within 1 year. Intravascular ultrasound revealed diffuse neointimal hyperplasia in the in-stent restenosis lesion, and the blood tests showed no sign of systemic inflammation or infection. Thus, we speculated that the cause of refractory in-stent restenosis was stent-mediated hypersensitivity. Initially, the in-stent restenosis was treated with paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty, and only mild neointimal hyperplasia was observed on intravascular ultrasound 3 months after paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty. However, the paclitaxel-coated balloon could not prevent in-stent restenosis recurrence, and she eventually underwent coronary artery bypass grafting. After over 2 years of follow-up, her cardiac function had significantly improved, and the bridging vessels remained patent, as confirmed by computed tomography angiography.

Conclusion: When encountering refractory in-stent restenosis, physicians should consider the potential for stent-associated hypersensitivity. Since there may be difficulty in obtaining histopathological examination of restenotic vessels, intravascular imaging can be instrumental in detecting neointimal hyperplasia and diagnosing stent allergy. Coronary artery bypass grafting may be a reasonable treatment for patients with stent allergy; further clinical research is required to explore the optimal treatments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支架诱导的超敏反应导致难治性支架内再狭窄1例报告。
背景:即使在新一代药物洗脱支架时代,支架内再狭窄仍然是经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的常见和具有挑战性的问题。在导致支架内再狭窄的诸多因素中,支架相关的超敏反应相对罕见,但可能是慢性难治性支架内再狭窄的重要触发因素。然而,很难诊断和评估支架相关的超敏反应,也没有标准化的治疗策略。病例介绍:我们报告一名63岁的中国女性,她在左主干、左前降支和左旋支成功植入铂铬依维莫司洗脱支架后出现难治性支架内再狭窄。虽然心血管危险因素得到了很好的控制,但患者在1年内发生了4次急性心肌梗死并支架内再狭窄。血管内超声显示支架内再狭窄病变处弥漫性内膜增生,血液检查未见全身性炎症或感染征象。因此,我们推测支架内难治性再狭窄的原因是支架介导的超敏反应。最初,采用紫杉醇包被球囊血管成形术治疗支架内再狭窄,在紫杉醇包被球囊血管成形术3个月后,血管内超声仅观察到轻度内膜增生。然而,紫杉醇包被球囊并不能防止支架内再狭窄的复发,最终她接受了冠状动脉搭桥术。经过2年多的随访,患者心功能明显改善,计算机断层血管造影证实其桥血管通畅。结论:当遇到难治性支架内再狭窄时,医生应考虑支架相关过敏的可能性。由于对再狭窄血管进行组织病理学检查可能存在困难,因此血管内成像可用于检测内膜增生和诊断支架过敏。冠状动脉旁路移植术可能是支架过敏患者的合理治疗方法;需要进一步的临床研究来探索最佳的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Case Reports
Journal of Medical Case Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
436
期刊介绍: JMCR is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that will consider any original case report that expands the field of general medical knowledge. Reports should show one of the following: 1. Unreported or unusual side effects or adverse interactions involving medications 2. Unexpected or unusual presentations of a disease 3. New associations or variations in disease processes 4. Presentations, diagnoses and/or management of new and emerging diseases 5. An unexpected association between diseases or symptoms 6. An unexpected event in the course of observing or treating a patient 7. Findings that shed new light on the possible pathogenesis of a disease or an adverse effect
期刊最新文献
The two-hit hypothesis in acute esophageal necrosis: black esophagus in severe atherosclerosis and untreated gastroesophageal reflux disease: a case report. Maternal near-miss from cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: emerging clinical challenge in resource-limited settings-a case series. Severe multiorgan toxicities after the first cycle of standard-dose etoposide-cisplatin therapy for metastatic nonseminoma successfully managed with etoposide-carboplatin: a case report. Endometriosis with hemorrhagic ascites in a perimenopausal woman: a case report. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome in a 26-year-old male presenting as acute pancreatitis and portal venous gas: a case report and review of the literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1