A Qualitative Study of Older Adult Perspectives on Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Type 2 Diabetes.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of General Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1007/s11606-025-09458-x
Molly L Tanenbaum, Ilana Peterson, Connie Uratsu, Minnie W Chen, Lisa Gilliam, Andrew J Karter, Anjali Gopalan, Richard W Grant, Esti Iturralde
{"title":"A Qualitative Study of Older Adult Perspectives on Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Type 2 Diabetes.","authors":"Molly L Tanenbaum, Ilana Peterson, Connie Uratsu, Minnie W Chen, Lisa Gilliam, Andrew J Karter, Anjali Gopalan, Richard W Grant, Esti Iturralde","doi":"10.1007/s11606-025-09458-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) may improve self-management and reduce hypoglycemia risk among individuals with diabetes. However, little is known about how older adults with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (T2D) experience and incorporate this technology into their daily lives.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore experiences, preferences, barriers, and questions related to using CGM among older adults with insulin-treated T2D with and without experience using CGM.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative focus group study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>English-speaking older adults with T2D in a large, integrated healthcare delivery system. Groups included either experienced CGM users or adults who had not previously used CGM. Recruitment efforts prioritized individuals ≥ 75 years of age.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>Transcripts were analyzed using the Framework Method to identify perspectives on CGM. Specific thematic categories were hypoglycemia-related benefits, general benefits, usefulness and ease of use concerns, and CGM questions.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>The study included 26 participants: 17 (65%) were experienced CGM users, 58% were female; median age was 74 (range 62-88) years. Participants perceived and anticipated these CGM benefits: informing behavior changes, reducing in-the-moment hypoglycemia risk, improving awareness and decision-making, and strengthening clinician collaboration. Perceived CGM barriers included challenges with wearability and reliability, burdens to others, distrust of technology, sensory and learning challenges, insufficient clinician support or engagement, and access and payer hurdles. Despite these downsides, experienced users perceived CGM as a worthwhile alternative to daily fingerstick glucose checks. Non-users were able to formulate many usability questions, providing a snapshot of informational needs for this age group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Older adults with insulin-treated T2D experienced or anticipated benefits from CGM for diabetes management. Findings indicate a need for tailored education and self-management support for older adults to learn and gain maximal benefit from this technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2624-2633"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12405080/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09458-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) may improve self-management and reduce hypoglycemia risk among individuals with diabetes. However, little is known about how older adults with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (T2D) experience and incorporate this technology into their daily lives.

Objective: To explore experiences, preferences, barriers, and questions related to using CGM among older adults with insulin-treated T2D with and without experience using CGM.

Design: Qualitative focus group study.

Participants: English-speaking older adults with T2D in a large, integrated healthcare delivery system. Groups included either experienced CGM users or adults who had not previously used CGM. Recruitment efforts prioritized individuals ≥ 75 years of age.

Approach: Transcripts were analyzed using the Framework Method to identify perspectives on CGM. Specific thematic categories were hypoglycemia-related benefits, general benefits, usefulness and ease of use concerns, and CGM questions.

Key results: The study included 26 participants: 17 (65%) were experienced CGM users, 58% were female; median age was 74 (range 62-88) years. Participants perceived and anticipated these CGM benefits: informing behavior changes, reducing in-the-moment hypoglycemia risk, improving awareness and decision-making, and strengthening clinician collaboration. Perceived CGM barriers included challenges with wearability and reliability, burdens to others, distrust of technology, sensory and learning challenges, insufficient clinician support or engagement, and access and payer hurdles. Despite these downsides, experienced users perceived CGM as a worthwhile alternative to daily fingerstick glucose checks. Non-users were able to formulate many usability questions, providing a snapshot of informational needs for this age group.

Conclusions: Older adults with insulin-treated T2D experienced or anticipated benefits from CGM for diabetes management. Findings indicate a need for tailored education and self-management support for older adults to learn and gain maximal benefit from this technology.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年人对2型糖尿病持续血糖监测的定性研究
背景:持续血糖监测(CGM)可以改善糖尿病患者的自我管理,降低低血糖风险。然而,对于患有胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病(T2D)的老年人如何体验并将这项技术融入他们的日常生活,人们知之甚少。目的:探讨胰岛素治疗t2dm患者有或没有使用CGM经验的老年人使用CGM的经历、偏好、障碍和问题。设计:定性焦点小组研究。参与者:在大型综合医疗保健系统中说英语的老年T2D患者。分组包括有经验的CGM使用者或以前没有使用过CGM的成年人。招募工作优先考虑年龄≥75岁的个体。方法:使用框架方法分析转录本,以确定对CGM的观点。具体的主题分类是与低血糖相关的益处、一般益处、有用性和易用性问题以及CGM问题。主要结果:该研究包括26名参与者:17名(65%)是有经验的CGM使用者,58%是女性;中位年龄为74岁(62-88岁)。参与者感知并预期了这些CGM益处:告知行为改变,降低即时低血糖风险,提高意识和决策,加强临床医生合作。感知到的CGM障碍包括可穿戴性和可靠性方面的挑战、对他人的负担、对技术的不信任、感觉和学习方面的挑战、临床医生支持或参与不足、访问和付款障碍。尽管存在这些缺点,但经验丰富的用户认为CGM是替代每日手指穿刺血糖检查的一种有价值的选择。非用户能够提出许多可用性问题,为这个年龄组提供信息需求的快照。结论:胰岛素治疗t2dm的老年人经历或预期从CGM中获益。研究结果表明,老年人需要量身定制的教育和自我管理支持,以学习并从这项技术中获得最大的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
期刊最新文献
Permanent Supportive Housing and Cardiovascular Outcomes Among Veterans Experiencing Homelessness: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis. Prevalence of Civil Legal Needs and Associated Characteristics Among US Department of Veterans Affairs Patients: A National Survey. Letter to the Editor: Virtual Reality as RESPITE: Relief Exploration for Sickle Pain Through Interventions Using Technology Engagement: A Hospital‑Based Observational Study. Zero Tolerance for Patient-Perpetrated Sexual Harassment. Hope, Grief, and Guilt: A Physician Son's Personal Reckoning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1