Efficacy of Selective Nerve Root Block for Different Types of Lumbar Disc Herniation: Study Protocol for a Single-Blind, Prospective Cohort Study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2025-02-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S494496
Hongping Tan, Jing Zhou, Yijin Pu, Lin He, Liu Wang
{"title":"Efficacy of Selective Nerve Root Block for Different Types of Lumbar Disc Herniation: Study Protocol for a Single-Blind, Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Hongping Tan, Jing Zhou, Yijin Pu, Lin He, Liu Wang","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S494496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a common cause of low back pain and radiculopathy. Selective Nerve Root Block (SNRB) has been widely used as a treatment for LDH; however, its efficacy across different types of LDH remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of SNRB in treating various LDH subtypes, classified according to the Michigan State University (MSU) classification system, and to explore its potential as a safe and minimally invasive percutaneous treatment option.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-blind, Prospective Cohort Study. A total of 200 patients diagnosed with LDH will be recruited and allocated into 10 groups (20 patients per group) based on their MSU classification (1-A, 1-B, 1-C, 2-AB, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 3-AB, 3-A, and 3-B). All patients will receive SNRB treatment under fluoroscopic guidance. Primary outcomes will include the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain intensity. Secondary outcomes will include the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), health-related quality of life (Short Form-36, SF-36) and average weekly analgesic consumption. Assessments will be conducted at baseline, 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year post-treatment.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study will provide high-quality evidence on the efficacy of SNRB in different LDH subtypes, classified according to the MSU system. The findings will guide clinical decision-making and promote the adoption of SNRB as a minimally invasive, safe, and effective treatment option for LDH.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This clinical trial is registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry platform (ChiCTR) at https://www.chictr.org.cn/index.html, identifier: ChiCTR2200067212.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"1035-1043"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11878110/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S494496","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a common cause of low back pain and radiculopathy. Selective Nerve Root Block (SNRB) has been widely used as a treatment for LDH; however, its efficacy across different types of LDH remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of SNRB in treating various LDH subtypes, classified according to the Michigan State University (MSU) classification system, and to explore its potential as a safe and minimally invasive percutaneous treatment option.

Methods: This is a single-blind, Prospective Cohort Study. A total of 200 patients diagnosed with LDH will be recruited and allocated into 10 groups (20 patients per group) based on their MSU classification (1-A, 1-B, 1-C, 2-AB, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 3-AB, 3-A, and 3-B). All patients will receive SNRB treatment under fluoroscopic guidance. Primary outcomes will include the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain intensity. Secondary outcomes will include the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), health-related quality of life (Short Form-36, SF-36) and average weekly analgesic consumption. Assessments will be conducted at baseline, 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year post-treatment.

Discussion: This study will provide high-quality evidence on the efficacy of SNRB in different LDH subtypes, classified according to the MSU system. The findings will guide clinical decision-making and promote the adoption of SNRB as a minimally invasive, safe, and effective treatment option for LDH.

Trial registration: This clinical trial is registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry platform (ChiCTR) at https://www.chictr.org.cn/index.html, identifier: ChiCTR2200067212.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
期刊最新文献
Telehealth is Crucial for Pain Medicine: Patients and Doctors are at the Brink, and Medicare Must Act Now. Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for Chronic Knee Joint Pain Using a V-Shaped Active Tip Needle: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Study. Biases in Artificial Intelligence Application in Pain Medicine. Efficacy of Selective Nerve Root Block for Different Types of Lumbar Disc Herniation: Study Protocol for a Single-Blind, Prospective Cohort Study. Efficacy and Safety of Non-Pharmacological Therapies for Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Network Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1