Evaluation of Dual Use: Real Time Reductions in Combustible Cigarette Smoking During Co-Occurring Use of E-Cigarettes A Secondary Analysis of a Naturalistic Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Nicotine & Tobacco Research Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1093/ntr/ntaf055
Matthew J Carpenter, Tracy T Smith, Kyle J Walters, Amy E Wahlquist, Katelyn R Koval, Elias M Klemperer
{"title":"Evaluation of Dual Use: Real Time Reductions in Combustible Cigarette Smoking During Co-Occurring Use of E-Cigarettes A Secondary Analysis of a Naturalistic Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Matthew J Carpenter, Tracy T Smith, Kyle J Walters, Amy E Wahlquist, Katelyn R Koval, Elias M Klemperer","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntaf055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The pattern and trajectory of dual use are critical to differentiating it as a health benefit vs. harm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based within a large, naturalistic randomized controlled trial of e-cigarette in the U.S., adults who smoke were given a 1-month sample of tank-style e-cigarette to use as they wish (n=427) or not (n=211). Analyses are restricted to participants from the e-cigarette group who became dual users by one month (DU; n=315) vs. participants in control group who exclusively used combustible cigarettes (EUCC; n=182). Primary outcomes are based on changes in combustible cigarette smoking (cigarettes per day; CPD) across daily diaries within sampling period, and at 3 and 6-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DUs reported significantly more diary days of large smoking reduction (smoking 1-50% of baseline CPD: 23.1% of all diary days) and not smoking (5.6% of all diary days) than did EUCCs (6.8% and 1.4%, respectively) during sampling period (p's < .001). Among DUs, 18.4% reported smoking 1-50% of baseline CPD and 9.5% were not smoking at Week 12; 17.5% reported smoking 1-50% of baseline CPD and 9.2% were not smoking at Week 24. In contrast, among EUCCs, 7.1% reported 1-50% of baseline CPD at Week 12 and 1.7% were not smoking. At Week 24, 8.2% reported 1-50% of baseline CPD and 7.1% were not smoking. Among DUs, e-cigarette use days were associated with greater probability of non-smoking days (8%) than non-e-cigarette use days (3%, p <.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to continued cigarette smoking, initiating dual use reduced smoking and increased cigarette-free days.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Contrary to some claims that dual use of combustible and e-cigarettes may perpetuate or even increase harmful exposure, evidence from the current analyses, collected in real time as dual use unfolds, suggest that dual use leads to significant and sustained reductions in cigarette smoking.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf055","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The pattern and trajectory of dual use are critical to differentiating it as a health benefit vs. harm.

Methods: Based within a large, naturalistic randomized controlled trial of e-cigarette in the U.S., adults who smoke were given a 1-month sample of tank-style e-cigarette to use as they wish (n=427) or not (n=211). Analyses are restricted to participants from the e-cigarette group who became dual users by one month (DU; n=315) vs. participants in control group who exclusively used combustible cigarettes (EUCC; n=182). Primary outcomes are based on changes in combustible cigarette smoking (cigarettes per day; CPD) across daily diaries within sampling period, and at 3 and 6-month follow-up.

Results: DUs reported significantly more diary days of large smoking reduction (smoking 1-50% of baseline CPD: 23.1% of all diary days) and not smoking (5.6% of all diary days) than did EUCCs (6.8% and 1.4%, respectively) during sampling period (p's < .001). Among DUs, 18.4% reported smoking 1-50% of baseline CPD and 9.5% were not smoking at Week 12; 17.5% reported smoking 1-50% of baseline CPD and 9.2% were not smoking at Week 24. In contrast, among EUCCs, 7.1% reported 1-50% of baseline CPD at Week 12 and 1.7% were not smoking. At Week 24, 8.2% reported 1-50% of baseline CPD and 7.1% were not smoking. Among DUs, e-cigarette use days were associated with greater probability of non-smoking days (8%) than non-e-cigarette use days (3%, p <.001).

Conclusion: Compared to continued cigarette smoking, initiating dual use reduced smoking and increased cigarette-free days.

Implications: Contrary to some claims that dual use of combustible and e-cigarettes may perpetuate or even increase harmful exposure, evidence from the current analyses, collected in real time as dual use unfolds, suggest that dual use leads to significant and sustained reductions in cigarette smoking.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
期刊最新文献
Demographic trends in e-cigarette social media marketing: perceiving gender presentation and facial age via computer vision. Bidirectional relationships between sleep quality and nicotine vaping: studying young adult e-cigarette users in real time and real life. Evaluation of Dual Use: Real Time Reductions in Combustible Cigarette Smoking During Co-Occurring Use of E-Cigarettes A Secondary Analysis of a Naturalistic Randomized Clinical Trial. Psychological Distress is Associated with Blunt Use Among Youth in the US: Insights from the 2021-2023 National Youth Tobacco Surveys. The Influence of Perimenstrual Daily Ovarian Hormones on Anxiety and Cigarette Craving.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1