Pop-off mechanisms in fetal megacystis: extravasation, umbilical cord cyst, ureterocele and megaureter.

IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 ACOUSTICS Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1002/uog.29200
L A M Brinkman, L K Duin, P N Adama van Scheltema, T E Cohen-Overbeek, E Pajkrt, M N Bekker, C Willekes, E J T Verweij, C Bilardo, F Fontanella
{"title":"Pop-off mechanisms in fetal megacystis: extravasation, umbilical cord cyst, ureterocele and megaureter.","authors":"L A M Brinkman, L K Duin, P N Adama van Scheltema, T E Cohen-Overbeek, E Pajkrt, M N Bekker, C Willekes, E J T Verweij, C Bilardo, F Fontanella","doi":"10.1002/uog.29200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze comprehensively the incidence, antenatal ultrasound characteristics and prognostic implications of antenatal pop-off mechanisms of the fetal urinary system in pregnancies with suspected fetal megacystis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective multicenter study of pregnancies with suspected fetal megacystis conducted across all academic hospitals in The Netherlands. Three antenatal pop-off mechanisms were identified: presence of an umbilical cord cyst (UCC), extravasation of urine into the intraperitoneal space (ascites) or perirenal subcapsular (urinoma), and megaureter/ureterocele. Cases that exhibited two different pop-off mechanisms, underwent vesicoamniotic shunt placement or had unclear information regarding shunt placement were excluded. We compared the antenatal ultrasound characteristics and outcomes among pregnancies with UCC, those with extravasation, those with megaureter/ureterocele and those without a pop-off mechanism. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association of pop-off mechanisms with antenatal characteristics and postnatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 543 fetuses with suspected megacystis, 76% exhibited no pop-off mechanism, 7% presented with UCC only, 9% presented with extravasation only, 7% presented with a megaureter/ureterocele only and 1% presented with two pop-off mechanisms. Following exclusions, 511 cases were included in the analysis. The identification of UCC (n = 39) was associated with early-onset megacystis (odds ratio (OR), 4.2 (95% CI, 1.9-9.1); P < 0.001), severe megacystis (OR 2.3 (95% CI, 1.1-5.0); P = 0.033), normal amniotic fluid index (AFI) (OR, 3.3 (95% CI, 1.3-8.2); P = 0.011) and additional associated anomaly (OR, 3.3 (95% CI, 1.7-6.4); P < 0.001), and thus with the highest prevalence of complex diagnosis (66%), primarily represented by anorectal malformation. Extravasation (n = 42) was associated with severe megacystis (OR, 2.4 (95% CI, 1.1-5.4); P = 0.030), abnormal AFI (OR, 2.8 (95% CI, 1.2-6.8); P = 0.022), the keyhole sign (OR, 2.5 (95% CI, 1.1-5.8); P = 0.033) and additional associated anomaly (OR, 2.1 (95% CI, 1.1-4.1); P = 0.026). Megaureter/ureterocele (n = 36) was associated with late-onset megacystis (OR, 4.0 (95% CI, 1.6-9.7); P = 0.003), a thickened bladder wall during pregnancy (OR, 6.6 (95% CI, 1.9-23.1); P = 0.003) and the lowest prevalence of additional associated anomaly (22%). Intrauterine fetal demise was most prevalent in fetuses with UCC (15%), while termination of pregnancy and non-survivors were most common in cases with extravasation (50% and 17%, respectively). The majority of fetuses with megacystis associated with megaureter/ureterocele were still alive during follow-up (72%) and the odds of survival were the highest for this group (OR, 2.7 (95% CI, 1.3-5.7); P = 0.010).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Antenatal pop-off mechanisms may alleviate high intraluminal pressure within the fetal urinary tract. Each mechanism leads to a different antenatal clinical picture and outcome, which may explain partially the heterogeneity of outcomes in fetuses with megacystis. Therefore, understanding the implications of these mechanisms and their antenatal characteristics could guide antenatal counseling and management of fetal megacystis. © 2025 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.</p>","PeriodicalId":23454,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29200","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze comprehensively the incidence, antenatal ultrasound characteristics and prognostic implications of antenatal pop-off mechanisms of the fetal urinary system in pregnancies with suspected fetal megacystis.

Methods: This was a retrospective multicenter study of pregnancies with suspected fetal megacystis conducted across all academic hospitals in The Netherlands. Three antenatal pop-off mechanisms were identified: presence of an umbilical cord cyst (UCC), extravasation of urine into the intraperitoneal space (ascites) or perirenal subcapsular (urinoma), and megaureter/ureterocele. Cases that exhibited two different pop-off mechanisms, underwent vesicoamniotic shunt placement or had unclear information regarding shunt placement were excluded. We compared the antenatal ultrasound characteristics and outcomes among pregnancies with UCC, those with extravasation, those with megaureter/ureterocele and those without a pop-off mechanism. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association of pop-off mechanisms with antenatal characteristics and postnatal outcomes.

Results: Among 543 fetuses with suspected megacystis, 76% exhibited no pop-off mechanism, 7% presented with UCC only, 9% presented with extravasation only, 7% presented with a megaureter/ureterocele only and 1% presented with two pop-off mechanisms. Following exclusions, 511 cases were included in the analysis. The identification of UCC (n = 39) was associated with early-onset megacystis (odds ratio (OR), 4.2 (95% CI, 1.9-9.1); P < 0.001), severe megacystis (OR 2.3 (95% CI, 1.1-5.0); P = 0.033), normal amniotic fluid index (AFI) (OR, 3.3 (95% CI, 1.3-8.2); P = 0.011) and additional associated anomaly (OR, 3.3 (95% CI, 1.7-6.4); P < 0.001), and thus with the highest prevalence of complex diagnosis (66%), primarily represented by anorectal malformation. Extravasation (n = 42) was associated with severe megacystis (OR, 2.4 (95% CI, 1.1-5.4); P = 0.030), abnormal AFI (OR, 2.8 (95% CI, 1.2-6.8); P = 0.022), the keyhole sign (OR, 2.5 (95% CI, 1.1-5.8); P = 0.033) and additional associated anomaly (OR, 2.1 (95% CI, 1.1-4.1); P = 0.026). Megaureter/ureterocele (n = 36) was associated with late-onset megacystis (OR, 4.0 (95% CI, 1.6-9.7); P = 0.003), a thickened bladder wall during pregnancy (OR, 6.6 (95% CI, 1.9-23.1); P = 0.003) and the lowest prevalence of additional associated anomaly (22%). Intrauterine fetal demise was most prevalent in fetuses with UCC (15%), while termination of pregnancy and non-survivors were most common in cases with extravasation (50% and 17%, respectively). The majority of fetuses with megacystis associated with megaureter/ureterocele were still alive during follow-up (72%) and the odds of survival were the highest for this group (OR, 2.7 (95% CI, 1.3-5.7); P = 0.010).

Conclusions: Antenatal pop-off mechanisms may alleviate high intraluminal pressure within the fetal urinary tract. Each mechanism leads to a different antenatal clinical picture and outcome, which may explain partially the heterogeneity of outcomes in fetuses with megacystis. Therefore, understanding the implications of these mechanisms and their antenatal characteristics could guide antenatal counseling and management of fetal megacystis. © 2025 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
14.10%
发文量
891
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology (UOG) is the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and is considered the foremost international peer-reviewed journal in the field. It publishes cutting-edge research that is highly relevant to clinical practice, which includes guidelines, expert commentaries, consensus statements, original articles, and systematic reviews. UOG is widely recognized and included in prominent abstract and indexing databases such as Index Medicus and Current Contents.
期刊最新文献
Ongoing outbreak of maternal parvovirus B19 infections in Germany since end of 2023: consequence of COVID-19 pandemic? Pop-off mechanisms in fetal megacystis: extravasation, umbilical cord cyst, ureterocele and megaureter. Detection of human cytomegalovirus cell-free DNA in pregnant women with symptomatically infected fetuses: proof-of-concept study. Delivering unexpected news in pregnancy: a call for specialized training. Radiomics analysis of ultrasound images to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses with solid morphology on ultrasound.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1