Assessing pet owners' knowledge and comprehension of veterinary medical terminology.

IF 1.4 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES Veterinary Record Pub Date : 2025-05-03 Epub Date: 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1002/vetr.5163
Camilla Piazza, Lluís Dominguez Cots, Charlotte Dye
{"title":"Assessing pet owners' knowledge and comprehension of veterinary medical terminology.","authors":"Camilla Piazza, Lluís Dominguez Cots, Charlotte Dye","doi":"10.1002/vetr.5163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Veterinary communication plays a key role in client satisfaction, patient outcomes and clinician wellbeing. Communication assessment tools can help to facilitate improvement strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over a 5-month period, pet owners attending a small animal hospital were asked to complete a survey assessing their understanding of commonly used veterinary terms and phrases, either online or in paper format. Scores were used to identify areas requiring improvement and investigate the effect of demographic characteristics on owner understanding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 378 completed questionnaires was received. Over 97% of owners rated the quality of veterinary communication as good or moderate to good. However, approximately one-fifth believed that communication could be improved. While veterinary terms and phrases were broadly understood, none was correctly interpreted by all respondents, and common misconceptions were identified. Respondents with prior medical knowledge scored higher.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The survey methodology allows for misinterpretation of questions, response bias and non-compliance with the requirement that respondents do not receive help in completing the survey from external sources.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While pet owners generally perceived veterinary communication to be good, some commonly used terms and phrases were frequently misinterpreted. Vets should therefore be encouraged to use lay terms when communicating with clients and to take time to confirm that their intended message has been fully understood.</p>","PeriodicalId":23560,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Record","volume":" ","pages":"e5163"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12047061/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Record","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/vetr.5163","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Veterinary communication plays a key role in client satisfaction, patient outcomes and clinician wellbeing. Communication assessment tools can help to facilitate improvement strategies.

Methods: Over a 5-month period, pet owners attending a small animal hospital were asked to complete a survey assessing their understanding of commonly used veterinary terms and phrases, either online or in paper format. Scores were used to identify areas requiring improvement and investigate the effect of demographic characteristics on owner understanding.

Results: A total of 378 completed questionnaires was received. Over 97% of owners rated the quality of veterinary communication as good or moderate to good. However, approximately one-fifth believed that communication could be improved. While veterinary terms and phrases were broadly understood, none was correctly interpreted by all respondents, and common misconceptions were identified. Respondents with prior medical knowledge scored higher.

Limitations: The survey methodology allows for misinterpretation of questions, response bias and non-compliance with the requirement that respondents do not receive help in completing the survey from external sources.

Conclusion: While pet owners generally perceived veterinary communication to be good, some commonly used terms and phrases were frequently misinterpreted. Vets should therefore be encouraged to use lay terms when communicating with clients and to take time to confirm that their intended message has been fully understood.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估宠物主人对兽医术语的知识和理解。
背景:兽医沟通在客户满意度、患者预后和临床医生健康方面起着关键作用。沟通评估工具可以帮助促进改进策略。方法:在5个月的时间里,在一家小型动物医院的宠物主人被要求完成一项调查,评估他们对常用兽医术语和短语的理解,包括在线调查和纸质调查。得分用于确定需要改进的领域,并调查人口统计学特征对业主理解的影响。结果:共收到问卷378份。超过97%的饲主认为兽医沟通质量良好或中等至良好。然而,大约五分之一的人认为通信可以得到改善。虽然兽医术语和短语被广泛理解,但没有一个被所有受访者正确解释,并且确定了常见的误解。具有先前医学知识的受访者得分更高。局限性:调查方法允许误解问题、回答偏差和不遵守要求,即受访者在完成调查时没有得到外部来源的帮助。结论:虽然宠物主人普遍认为兽医沟通良好,但一些常用术语和短语经常被误解。因此,应鼓励兽医在与客户沟通时使用外行术语,并花时间确认他们想要传达的信息已被完全理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary Record
Veterinary Record 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
1181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Record (branded as Vet Record) is the official journal of the British Veterinary Association (BVA) and has been published weekly since 1888. It contains news, opinion, letters, scientific reviews and original research papers and communications on a wide range of veterinary topics, along with disease surveillance reports, obituaries, careers information, business and innovation news and summaries of research papers in other journals. It is published on behalf of the BVA by BMJ Group.
期刊最新文献
Outcomes from an intervention study implementing fee-free culture and susceptibility urine testing in dogs and cats. Frequency and risk factors for tail injuries in UK dogs under primary veterinary care. Hypofolataemia in five cats with immune-mediated haemolytic anaemia. Effect of 'combing' on intramuscular sedation in pigs in a clinical setting-A randomised trial. Cross-sectional survey of the development and use of surgical safety checklists in small animal referral hospitals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1