The role of antenatal education on maternal self-efficacy, fear of childbirth, and birth outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.5 Q3 NURSING European Journal of Midwifery Pub Date : 2025-03-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.18332/ejm/200747
Amal Zaman, Hammad A Fadlalmola, Sara E Ibrahem, Fathia H Ismail, Huda H Abedelwahed, Amira M Ali, Nafesa H Abdelgadim, Amna M A Mustafa, Insaf H Ahmed, Nasreldeen M Ahmed, Amna A Eltyeb, Dalia A Gaafar, Soad M Alnassry, Afaf A Adam, Nagat S Yasin, Rasha A Ali, Aida A Fadlalla, Amira E Eltayeb, Amira M Saad
{"title":"The role of antenatal education on maternal self-efficacy, fear of childbirth, and birth outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Amal Zaman, Hammad A Fadlalmola, Sara E Ibrahem, Fathia H Ismail, Huda H Abedelwahed, Amira M Ali, Nafesa H Abdelgadim, Amna M A Mustafa, Insaf H Ahmed, Nasreldeen M Ahmed, Amna A Eltyeb, Dalia A Gaafar, Soad M Alnassry, Afaf A Adam, Nagat S Yasin, Rasha A Ali, Aida A Fadlalla, Amira E Eltayeb, Amira M Saad","doi":"10.18332/ejm/200747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Antenatal education programs aim to prepare expectant mothers for childbirth and early parenthood. This meta-analysis assessed the impact of these programs on maternal psychological outcomes and birth experiences, focusing on childbirth self-efficacy, fear of childbirth, and maternal and neonatal outcomes, including rates of vaginal delivery, cesarean section, Apgar scores, and birth weight.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Library until July 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing antenatal education to standard care were included. Data were synthesized using meta-analysis with standardized mean differences (SMD) for continuous outcomes and risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty studies were reviewed, with 31 eligible for meta-analysis. Among 1116 pregnant women, antenatal education significantly increased childbirth self-efficacy (SMD=2.00; 95% CI: 1.06-2.95, p<0.0001) and decreased fear of childbirth (SMD= -1.26; 95% CI: -1.79 - -0.74, p<0.00001). Maternal outcomes showed higher vaginal delivery rates (RR=1.10; 95% CI: 1.04-1.16, p=0.0004) and lower cesarean rates (RR=0.80; 95% CI: 0.70-0.92, p=0.001). No significant differences were found in episiotomy rates, Apgar scores, or birth weight.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Antenatal education improves maternal psychological outcomes and promotes vaginal delivery. However, high heterogeneity and potential bias in the studies limit generalizability. More research is needed on long-term impacts and effectiveness in low-resource settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":32920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Midwifery","volume":"9 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11873927/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/200747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Antenatal education programs aim to prepare expectant mothers for childbirth and early parenthood. This meta-analysis assessed the impact of these programs on maternal psychological outcomes and birth experiences, focusing on childbirth self-efficacy, fear of childbirth, and maternal and neonatal outcomes, including rates of vaginal delivery, cesarean section, Apgar scores, and birth weight.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Library until July 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing antenatal education to standard care were included. Data were synthesized using meta-analysis with standardized mean differences (SMD) for continuous outcomes and risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes.

Results: Forty studies were reviewed, with 31 eligible for meta-analysis. Among 1116 pregnant women, antenatal education significantly increased childbirth self-efficacy (SMD=2.00; 95% CI: 1.06-2.95, p<0.0001) and decreased fear of childbirth (SMD= -1.26; 95% CI: -1.79 - -0.74, p<0.00001). Maternal outcomes showed higher vaginal delivery rates (RR=1.10; 95% CI: 1.04-1.16, p=0.0004) and lower cesarean rates (RR=0.80; 95% CI: 0.70-0.92, p=0.001). No significant differences were found in episiotomy rates, Apgar scores, or birth weight.

Conclusions: Antenatal education improves maternal psychological outcomes and promotes vaginal delivery. However, high heterogeneity and potential bias in the studies limit generalizability. More research is needed on long-term impacts and effectiveness in low-resource settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Midwifery
European Journal of Midwifery Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
15.80%
发文量
65
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
The role of antenatal education on maternal self-efficacy, fear of childbirth, and birth outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Bristol Breastfeeding Assessment Tool (BBAT): Α systematic review of the psychometric properties of the translated versions. Optimizing breastfeeding for hospitalized newborns: A narrative review of midwifery-led interventions. Ukrainian refugee women's experience with maternity care in Norway: A qualitative study. The lived experiences of newly qualified midwives in supporting women during labor and birth: A hermeneutic phenomenological study in Malta.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1