The Effect of Preoperative Tamsulosin on Pediatric Ureteroscopic Access: A Multi-Institutional Experience.

IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urology Practice Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000793
Kayla M Meyer, Kwesi Asantey, Jonathan S Ellison, Aditya Jadcherla, Tori Kostman, Adam Ostergar, Erica J Traxel, Alethea Paradis, Joel Vetter, Douglas W Storm, Linder Wendt, Patrick Ten Eyck, Erik S Davis, Lauren McGee, Kate H Kraft
{"title":"The Effect of Preoperative Tamsulosin on Pediatric Ureteroscopic Access: A Multi-Institutional Experience.","authors":"Kayla M Meyer, Kwesi Asantey, Jonathan S Ellison, Aditya Jadcherla, Tori Kostman, Adam Ostergar, Erica J Traxel, Alethea Paradis, Joel Vetter, Douglas W Storm, Linder Wendt, Patrick Ten Eyck, Erik S Davis, Lauren McGee, Kate H Kraft","doi":"10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The ability to perform flexible ureteroscopy in children may be limited due to a smaller pediatric ureterovesical junction and ureteral diameter. Tamsulosin has been shown to improve success rates of ureteral instrumentation in adults. To date, the efficacy of this medication to facilitate pediatric ureteral access remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective review of patients aged 0-17 years who underwent ureteroscopy for the treatment of nephrolithiasis from 2013 to 2022. Patients were excluded if they had undergone ureteroscopy or ureteral stent placement within the prior year, underwent semi-rigid ureteroscopy, or had a known genitourinary abnormality. Study groups included patients prescribed 0.4 mg tamsulosin daily for at least one week preoperatively and patients who did not receive tamsulosin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 382 patients included, with 126 in the tamsulosin group and 256 in the no tamsulosin group. Although there were no differences in gender, race, and stone characteristics between the two groups, the tamsulosin group was significantly older and had a larger BMI. One week of preoperative tamsulosin was associated with a significantly increased success of flexible ureteroscopic access on first attempt ureteroscopy, with a 24% failure in the no tamsulosin group versus a 13% failure in the tamsulosin group (p=0.010).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results expand on prior research and suggest that at least one week of preoperative tamsulosin facilitates flexible ureteroscopic access in the pediatric population. These results have significant clinical implications, with the potential to reduce multiple procedures and spare children from repeat anesthetic exposures.</p>","PeriodicalId":45220,"journal":{"name":"Urology Practice","volume":" ","pages":"101097UPJ0000000000000793"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The ability to perform flexible ureteroscopy in children may be limited due to a smaller pediatric ureterovesical junction and ureteral diameter. Tamsulosin has been shown to improve success rates of ureteral instrumentation in adults. To date, the efficacy of this medication to facilitate pediatric ureteral access remains unclear.

Methods: We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective review of patients aged 0-17 years who underwent ureteroscopy for the treatment of nephrolithiasis from 2013 to 2022. Patients were excluded if they had undergone ureteroscopy or ureteral stent placement within the prior year, underwent semi-rigid ureteroscopy, or had a known genitourinary abnormality. Study groups included patients prescribed 0.4 mg tamsulosin daily for at least one week preoperatively and patients who did not receive tamsulosin.

Results: There were 382 patients included, with 126 in the tamsulosin group and 256 in the no tamsulosin group. Although there were no differences in gender, race, and stone characteristics between the two groups, the tamsulosin group was significantly older and had a larger BMI. One week of preoperative tamsulosin was associated with a significantly increased success of flexible ureteroscopic access on first attempt ureteroscopy, with a 24% failure in the no tamsulosin group versus a 13% failure in the tamsulosin group (p=0.010).

Conclusions: Our results expand on prior research and suggest that at least one week of preoperative tamsulosin facilitates flexible ureteroscopic access in the pediatric population. These results have significant clinical implications, with the potential to reduce multiple procedures and spare children from repeat anesthetic exposures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urology Practice
Urology Practice UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
163
期刊最新文献
National and Location-Specific Medicare Physician Fee Reimbursement Trends in Urologic Oncology from 2002-2024. The Effect of Preoperative Tamsulosin on Pediatric Ureteroscopic Access: A Multi-Institutional Experience. The use of an OSCE with a standardized patient actor to assess professionalism and communication for the oral certifying exam: the initial experience of the American Board of Urology. Algorithm-Based Mobile Texting Platform for the Self-Management of Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome: Pilot Study Evaluating Feasibility, Usability, and Potential Utility. Fertility Preservation for Iatrogenic Infertility: Patient Barriers and Opportunities for the Reproductive Medicine Workforce.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1