Post-Acute Concussion-Related Differences in Neuromotor Control Measured Using a Low-Cost Movement Assessment System: A Feasibility Study.

IF 2.1 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2025-03-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.26603/001c.129888
Jacob Thomas, Rebecca Bliss, Caitlin Fields, Tristan Farnen, Trent Guess
{"title":"Post-Acute Concussion-Related Differences in Neuromotor Control Measured Using a Low-Cost Movement Assessment System: A Feasibility Study.","authors":"Jacob Thomas, Rebecca Bliss, Caitlin Fields, Tristan Farnen, Trent Guess","doi":"10.26603/001c.129888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Athletes prematurely cleared to play following concussion increase their risk for subsequent concussion and musculoskeletal injury, leading practitioners to call for low-cost and objective tools to identify lingering neuromotor control deficits following concussion. # PurposeThe purpose of this feasibility study was to determine the usefulness of Mizzou Point-of-care Assessment System (MPASS) measures for creating a discriminant model classifying individuals as being either healthy or in the post-acute phase of concussion (having suffered a concussion within the prior three months).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten participants with concussion injury (Mean = 3.9 ± 1.66 wks. post-concussion) and twelve with no concussion within the prior year participated in this study. All participants completed walking (normal, serial subtraction by seven, and head shaking), Romberg balance (eyes open and eyes closed on firm surface), and reaction time tasks while MPASS recorded kinematics, kinetics, and reaction time. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to reduce the dimensionality of MPASS data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using four retained principal components (PCs), the LDA model achieved a statistically significant (p = 0.007) accuracy of 82% with 80% sensitivity and 83% specificity for classifying participants into groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This work presents a framework for assessing the discriminative power of multidimensional and clinically feasible tools for assessing human movement.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>3.</p>","PeriodicalId":47892,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"20 3","pages":"392-399"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11872567/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.129888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Athletes prematurely cleared to play following concussion increase their risk for subsequent concussion and musculoskeletal injury, leading practitioners to call for low-cost and objective tools to identify lingering neuromotor control deficits following concussion. # PurposeThe purpose of this feasibility study was to determine the usefulness of Mizzou Point-of-care Assessment System (MPASS) measures for creating a discriminant model classifying individuals as being either healthy or in the post-acute phase of concussion (having suffered a concussion within the prior three months).

Study design: Cross-sectional.

Methods: Ten participants with concussion injury (Mean = 3.9 ± 1.66 wks. post-concussion) and twelve with no concussion within the prior year participated in this study. All participants completed walking (normal, serial subtraction by seven, and head shaking), Romberg balance (eyes open and eyes closed on firm surface), and reaction time tasks while MPASS recorded kinematics, kinetics, and reaction time. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to reduce the dimensionality of MPASS data.

Results: Using four retained principal components (PCs), the LDA model achieved a statistically significant (p = 0.007) accuracy of 82% with 80% sensitivity and 83% specificity for classifying participants into groups.

Conclusion: This work presents a framework for assessing the discriminative power of multidimensional and clinically feasible tools for assessing human movement.

Level of evidence: 3.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用低成本运动评估系统测量急性脑震荡后神经运动控制的相关差异:可行性研究。
背景:运动员在脑震荡后过早恢复比赛增加了他们随后发生脑震荡和肌肉骨骼损伤的风险,这使得从业者呼吁使用低成本和客观的工具来识别脑震荡后遗留的神经运动控制缺陷。本可行性研究的目的是确定Mizzou即时护理评估系统(MPASS)措施的有效性,以创建一个判别模型,将个体分类为健康或脑震荡后急性期(在过去三个月内遭受脑震荡)。研究设计:横断面。方法:10例脑震荡损伤患者(平均= 3.9±1.66周)。脑震荡后)和12名前一年没有脑震荡的人参加了这项研究。所有参与者都完成了步行(正常、连续减7、摇头)、Romberg平衡(在坚硬的表面上睁眼和闭眼)和反应时间任务,而MPASS记录了运动学、动力学和反应时间。采用主成分分析(PCA)对MPASS数据进行降维处理。结果:使用四个保留主成分(PCs), LDA模型对参与者进行分组的准确率达到82%,灵敏度为80%,特异性为83%,具有统计学意义(p = 0.007)。结论:这项工作提出了一个框架,用于评估人类运动的多维和临床可行工具的鉴别能力。证据等级:3。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
124
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effects of Lower-Leg Fascial Flossing on Flexibility and Performance in Collegiate Distance Runners: Ultrasound Evaluation of Fascial Gliding. Interval Throwing Programs of Various Duration for Baseball Players Based on Biomechanical Workload Data. Radial Pressure Wave and Focused Shockwave Therapy for Proximal Hamstring Tendinopathy: The Role of Patient Positioning, a Narrative Review and Clinical Commentary. Optimal Number of Practice Trials for Balance and Hop Tests in Individuals with Chronic Ankle Instability. Assessing Balance in Young Athletes With and Without Chronic Ankle Instability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1