The Impact of Real-Time Biofeedback on Partial Weightbearing Training: A Comparative Study.

IF 2.1 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2025-03-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.26603/001c.129259
Leonard Lisitano, Zarek Hezrrai DaSilva, Nicholas Koch, Willie Dong, Tyler Thorne, Timon Röttinger, Daniel Pfeufer, Justin Haller
{"title":"The Impact of Real-Time Biofeedback on Partial Weightbearing Training: A Comparative Study.","authors":"Leonard Lisitano, Zarek Hezrrai DaSilva, Nicholas Koch, Willie Dong, Tyler Thorne, Timon Röttinger, Daniel Pfeufer, Justin Haller","doi":"10.26603/001c.129259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Partial Weight Bearing (PWB) is integral to rehabilitation protocols following orthopedic and trauma surgeries. Standard of Care (SOC) for PWB training often involves using a bathroom scale, a method criticized for its inaccuracy. This study aimed to compare SOC training in PWB with a biofeedback device (insole).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty healthy participants were randomized into SOC or Biofeedback (BF) training groups, practicing 20 kg PWB using a standardized protocol. Gait data, including compliance with weightbearing restrictions (not exceeding 150% of the set weightbearing limit), was monitored using Loadsol® insole force sensors. Participant satisfaction and usability were assessed through questionnaires. Training duration and walking speed were also measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The BF group's peak force averaged 330 Newtons, significantly lower than the SOC group's 600 Newtons, which exceeded the prescribed limit by over three times (p ≤ 0.001). Compliance with weightbearing restrictions was substantially higher in the BF group (88% or 29/33 participants) compared to the SOC group (19% or 5/27 participants) (p ≤ 0.001). The BF group also required less training time to learn PWB, averaging 9:00 ± 3:06 minutes, versus 12:49 ± 3:01 minutes in the SOC group (p ≤ 0.001). Questionnaire responses showed no significant differences between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Real-time audio-visual Biofeedback significantly enhances compliance with weightbearing restrictions in PWB training while reducing the training duration. Based on these findings, the implementation of biofeedback devices in PWB training is recommended.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>3.</p>","PeriodicalId":47892,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"20 3","pages":"364-372"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11872552/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.129259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Partial Weight Bearing (PWB) is integral to rehabilitation protocols following orthopedic and trauma surgeries. Standard of Care (SOC) for PWB training often involves using a bathroom scale, a method criticized for its inaccuracy. This study aimed to compare SOC training in PWB with a biofeedback device (insole).

Methods: Sixty healthy participants were randomized into SOC or Biofeedback (BF) training groups, practicing 20 kg PWB using a standardized protocol. Gait data, including compliance with weightbearing restrictions (not exceeding 150% of the set weightbearing limit), was monitored using Loadsol® insole force sensors. Participant satisfaction and usability were assessed through questionnaires. Training duration and walking speed were also measured.

Results: The BF group's peak force averaged 330 Newtons, significantly lower than the SOC group's 600 Newtons, which exceeded the prescribed limit by over three times (p ≤ 0.001). Compliance with weightbearing restrictions was substantially higher in the BF group (88% or 29/33 participants) compared to the SOC group (19% or 5/27 participants) (p ≤ 0.001). The BF group also required less training time to learn PWB, averaging 9:00 ± 3:06 minutes, versus 12:49 ± 3:01 minutes in the SOC group (p ≤ 0.001). Questionnaire responses showed no significant differences between groups.

Conclusion: Real-time audio-visual Biofeedback significantly enhances compliance with weightbearing restrictions in PWB training while reducing the training duration. Based on these findings, the implementation of biofeedback devices in PWB training is recommended.

Level of evidence: 3.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实时生物反馈对部分负重训练的影响:一项比较研究。
部分负重(PWB)是骨科和创伤手术后康复方案中不可或缺的一部分。PWB培训的护理标准(SOC)通常涉及使用浴室称,这种方法因其不准确而受到批评。本研究的目的是比较生物反馈装置(鞋垫)在PWB中的SOC训练。方法:60名健康受试者随机分为SOC组和BF组,采用标准化训练方案进行20 kg PWB训练。步态数据,包括遵守负重限制(不超过设定负重限制的150%),使用Loadsol®鞋垫力传感器进行监测。通过问卷调查评估参与者满意度和可用性。训练时间和步行速度也被测量。结果:BF组的峰值力平均为330牛顿,显著低于SOC组的600牛顿,超出规定限值3倍以上(p≤0.001)。与SOC组(19%或5/27)相比,BF组(88%或29/33)对负重限制的依从性要高得多(p≤0.001)。BF组学习PWB所需的训练时间也更少,平均为9:00±3:06分钟,而SOC组为12:49±3:01分钟(p≤0.001)。问卷调查结果显示各组间无显著差异。结论:实时视听生物反馈可显著提高PWB训练中负重限制的依从性,缩短训练时间。基于这些发现,建议在PWB培训中实施生物反馈装置。证据等级:3。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
124
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Multimodal Approach for the Management of Moderate Hip Osteoarthritis in A Runner: A Case Report. Current Concepts in Hip and Core Assessment to Reduce the Risk of ACL Injury. Evaluation of Reactive Strength Index During Single-Limb Vertical Jumps and Isokinetic Strength Five to Eight Months After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Total Knee Arthroplasty Rehabilitation Strategies for Avoiding Arthrofibrosis and Other Complications with the Goal of Return to Recreational Activities and Active Lifestyle. Perceptions of Biomechanical Devices in Collegiate Baseball Pitchers and Training Staff: A Qualitative Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1