Methodological Considerations in the Analysis of Acoustically Evoked Neural Signals: A Comparative Study of Active EEG, Passive EEG and MEG.

Abstract

Analyzing and deciphering brain signals on a single trial base is the main goal of brain-computer interface (BCI) research as well as neurolinguistics. In the present study, we have evaluated the efficacy of three neuroimaging techniques-active electroencephalography (EEG), passive EEG, and magnetoencephalography (MEG)-in capturing and evaluating brain activity in response to auditory stimuli. The main goals of our research included two primary components: first, to identify ROIs, and second, to determine the appropriate number of stimulus samples needed to achieve a meaningful level of reliability. To estimate this number of measurement repetitions we performed step-wise sub-sampling combined with permutation testing. This involved a detailed comparison of event-related potentials resp. fields (ERPs, ERFs) elicited by auditory stimuli such as acoustic clicks and continuous speech. Our results show that active EEG outperformed passive EEG and MEG in sensor space. However, MEG demonstrated superior signal localization in source space. These results also highlight the complexity of developing real-time speech BCIs.