Optimizing compliance with latent tuberculosis infection screening among kidney transplant recipients.

Alfonso Gotor-Rivera, Lucia de Jorge-Huerta, José Tiago Silva, Mario Fernández-Ruiz, Isabel Rodríguez-Goncer, María Asunción Pérez-Jacoiste Asín, Tamara Ruiz-Merlo, Carlos Heredia-Mena, Esther González-Monte, Natalia Polanco, Rafael San Juan, Amado Andrés, José María Aguado, Francisco López-Medrano
{"title":"Optimizing compliance with latent tuberculosis infection screening among kidney transplant recipients.","authors":"Alfonso Gotor-Rivera, Lucia de Jorge-Huerta, José Tiago Silva, Mario Fernández-Ruiz, Isabel Rodríguez-Goncer, María Asunción Pérez-Jacoiste Asín, Tamara Ruiz-Merlo, Carlos Heredia-Mena, Esther González-Monte, Natalia Polanco, Rafael San Juan, Amado Andrés, José María Aguado, Francisco López-Medrano","doi":"10.37201/req/002.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The increased risk of tuberculosis (TB) reactivation in solid organ transplant recipients supports the recommendation of screening for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). Adherence to available screening tests has not been studied in the kidney transplant (KT) population. We aimed to assess screening compliance within the ATALANTA-DOS population study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ATALANTA-DOS studied an intervention bundle aimed at preventing infection in KT recipients. We compared LTBI screening rates between the pre-intervention (February 2016 - September 2017) and intervention (February 2018 - September 2019) cohorts and evaluated adherence rates between the interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) and the tuberculin skin test (TST).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 307 KT recipients were included (155 in the pre-intervention cohort; 148 in the intervention cohort). A systematic assessment of screening compliance by an infectious disease specialist on day +30 post-KT improved LTBI screening adherence (82.6% [114/138] vs 1.3% [2/155]; p-value <0.001). In the intervention cohort, compliance was higher with IGRA (83.3% [52/62]) than with TST (68.1% [49/72]). Two cases of LTBI were detected in the pre-intervention cohort and five in the intervention cohort (4.4% [5/114]). All patients completed LTBI treatment after ruling out active TB. No cases of active TB were identified during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Systematic evaluation of LTBI screening compliance significantly increased screening completion rates among KT recipients. IGRA-based strategies increased screening compliance, supporting their implementation over TST for LTBI screening among KT recipients. Increased adherence would allow a more targeted and effective treatment of LTBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":94198,"journal":{"name":"Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia","volume":"38 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37201/req/002.2025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The increased risk of tuberculosis (TB) reactivation in solid organ transplant recipients supports the recommendation of screening for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). Adherence to available screening tests has not been studied in the kidney transplant (KT) population. We aimed to assess screening compliance within the ATALANTA-DOS population study.

Methods: ATALANTA-DOS studied an intervention bundle aimed at preventing infection in KT recipients. We compared LTBI screening rates between the pre-intervention (February 2016 - September 2017) and intervention (February 2018 - September 2019) cohorts and evaluated adherence rates between the interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) and the tuberculin skin test (TST).

Results: A total of 307 KT recipients were included (155 in the pre-intervention cohort; 148 in the intervention cohort). A systematic assessment of screening compliance by an infectious disease specialist on day +30 post-KT improved LTBI screening adherence (82.6% [114/138] vs 1.3% [2/155]; p-value <0.001). In the intervention cohort, compliance was higher with IGRA (83.3% [52/62]) than with TST (68.1% [49/72]). Two cases of LTBI were detected in the pre-intervention cohort and five in the intervention cohort (4.4% [5/114]). All patients completed LTBI treatment after ruling out active TB. No cases of active TB were identified during follow-up.

Conclusions: Systematic evaluation of LTBI screening compliance significantly increased screening completion rates among KT recipients. IGRA-based strategies increased screening compliance, supporting their implementation over TST for LTBI screening among KT recipients. Increased adherence would allow a more targeted and effective treatment of LTBI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Usefulness of business intelligence to guide antimicrobial treatment decision in infections by infrequent microorganism such as Bordetella bronchiseptica. [Análisis de la concordancia entre la estratificación teórica y real en pacientes que viven con la infección por VIH atendidos en un hospital de tercer nivel]. Cefiderocol-associated chromaturia, a secondary side effect to recognize. Optimizing compliance with latent tuberculosis infection screening among kidney transplant recipients. [Distribution of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli pathotypes in the pediatric population and antibiotic susceptibility profile in the Valladolid Oeste health area (ASVAO)].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1