Bolstering critical minerals trade between India and other MSP countries: A gravity model evaluation

IF 10.2 2区 经济学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Resources Policy Pub Date : 2025-03-06 DOI:10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105542
Iqra Yaseen , Surendar Singh , Suvajit Banerjee
{"title":"Bolstering critical minerals trade between India and other MSP countries: A gravity model evaluation","authors":"Iqra Yaseen ,&nbsp;Surendar Singh ,&nbsp;Suvajit Banerjee","doi":"10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aims to evaluate the opportunities for a sustainable environment, an equitable economy, and a just society through the international trade of critical minerals. By employing a gravity model, it intricately analyzes the trade dynamics between India and 13 other members of the Mineral Securities Partnership (MSP). The study indicates a landscape rich with potential for enhancing environmental protection; however, this is somewhat overshadowed by a decrease in the overall impacts on the economic and social dimensions of sustainable trade practices. The apparent lack of synergy among the various outcomes that arise from increased trade underscores a pressing need for policymakers to create pathways where environmental, economic, and social opportunities can harmoniously reinforce one another, amplifying the benefits of critical mineral trade. Moreover, the empirical findings highlight that income heterogeneity positively influences sustainable trade practices across environmental, economic, and societal fronts, thereby affirming the Heckscher-Ohlin hypothesis. Crucially, the study identifies the variability in trade uncertainty between partners as a powerful catalyst for trade and a driver of innovation within MSP countries. The discussion further delves into the effects of research and innovation, currency exchange, and geographical distance on sustainable trade, especially concerning QUAD and non-QUAD nations. This emphasizes the imperative for customized strategies that elevate global sustainable trade, considering the unique economic structures and regulatory landscapes at play.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20970,"journal":{"name":"Resources Policy","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 105542"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420725000844","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the opportunities for a sustainable environment, an equitable economy, and a just society through the international trade of critical minerals. By employing a gravity model, it intricately analyzes the trade dynamics between India and 13 other members of the Mineral Securities Partnership (MSP). The study indicates a landscape rich with potential for enhancing environmental protection; however, this is somewhat overshadowed by a decrease in the overall impacts on the economic and social dimensions of sustainable trade practices. The apparent lack of synergy among the various outcomes that arise from increased trade underscores a pressing need for policymakers to create pathways where environmental, economic, and social opportunities can harmoniously reinforce one another, amplifying the benefits of critical mineral trade. Moreover, the empirical findings highlight that income heterogeneity positively influences sustainable trade practices across environmental, economic, and societal fronts, thereby affirming the Heckscher-Ohlin hypothesis. Crucially, the study identifies the variability in trade uncertainty between partners as a powerful catalyst for trade and a driver of innovation within MSP countries. The discussion further delves into the effects of research and innovation, currency exchange, and geographical distance on sustainable trade, especially concerning QUAD and non-QUAD nations. This emphasizes the imperative for customized strategies that elevate global sustainable trade, considering the unique economic structures and regulatory landscapes at play.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Policy
Resources Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
23.50%
发文量
602
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Resources Policy is an international journal focused on the economics and policy aspects of mineral and fossil fuel extraction, production, and utilization. It targets individuals in academia, government, and industry. The journal seeks original research submissions analyzing public policy, economics, social science, geography, and finance in the fields of mining, non-fuel minerals, energy minerals, fossil fuels, and metals. Mineral economics topics covered include mineral market analysis, price analysis, project evaluation, mining and sustainable development, mineral resource rents, resource curse, mineral wealth and corruption, mineral taxation and regulation, strategic minerals and their supply, and the impact of mineral development on local communities and indigenous populations. The journal specifically excludes papers with agriculture, forestry, or fisheries as their primary focus.
期刊最新文献
The sustainability challenge and social benefits of industrialisation in NICs The effectiveness of OPEC and OPEC+ from 2009 to 2024: An empirical appraisal Unveiling the nexus: Impact of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) on foreign direct investment (FDI) Mining-induced displacement and livelihood restoration: A data-driven approach Bolstering critical minerals trade between India and other MSP countries: A gravity model evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1