Estimating vegetation aboveground biomass in Yellow River Delta coastal wetlands using Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 imagery

IF 5.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Informatics Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103096
Yiming Xu , Yunmeng Qin , Bin Li , Jiahan Li
{"title":"Estimating vegetation aboveground biomass in Yellow River Delta coastal wetlands using Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 imagery","authors":"Yiming Xu ,&nbsp;Yunmeng Qin ,&nbsp;Bin Li ,&nbsp;Jiahan Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate analyzing the spatial pattern and spatial uncertainty of vegetation aboveground biomass (AGB) in coastal wetland is critical for addressing sustainable blue carbon management goals. Eight models based on Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) method were established to analyze the capability of Sentinel-1 (S1), Sentine-2 (S2) and Landsat-8 (L8) data for predicting AGB in coastal wetlands of the Yellow River Delta (YRD), China. Spatial uncertainty of AGB was quantified by Quantile Regression Forest (QRF) method. The results showed that AGB model based on S2 achieved higher model performance (R<sup>2</sup>: 0.74, RMSE: 171.23 g/m<sup>2</sup>) compared with those based on L8 (R<sup>2</sup>: 0.59, RMSE: 198.84 g/m<sup>2</sup>) and S1 (R<sup>2</sup>: 0.43, RMSE: 219.60 g/m<sup>2</sup>). The AGB model based on S1, S2, L8 and other predictive variables including the terrain and biophysical factors (S1S2L8plus) achieved the highest model performance (R<sup>2</sup>: 0.80, RMSE: 154.98 g/m<sup>2</sup>) among all the models. Red-edge related-spectral indices derived from S2 were proved to be important predictors in AGB modelling. The spatial uncertainty quantified by QRF showed the spatial prediction uncertainties of AGB models based on S2S2L8plus and S2 were lower than AGB model based on S1L8. The results of this study demonstrate the suitability of optical remote sensing data especially S2 and the weak capability of S1 in modelling AGB in coastal wetlands of the YRD. The regularly modelling, mapping and uncertainty estimations of AGB could help guide the sustainable blue carbon management in coastal wetlands.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51024,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Informatics","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 103096"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1574954125001050","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate analyzing the spatial pattern and spatial uncertainty of vegetation aboveground biomass (AGB) in coastal wetland is critical for addressing sustainable blue carbon management goals. Eight models based on Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) method were established to analyze the capability of Sentinel-1 (S1), Sentine-2 (S2) and Landsat-8 (L8) data for predicting AGB in coastal wetlands of the Yellow River Delta (YRD), China. Spatial uncertainty of AGB was quantified by Quantile Regression Forest (QRF) method. The results showed that AGB model based on S2 achieved higher model performance (R2: 0.74, RMSE: 171.23 g/m2) compared with those based on L8 (R2: 0.59, RMSE: 198.84 g/m2) and S1 (R2: 0.43, RMSE: 219.60 g/m2). The AGB model based on S1, S2, L8 and other predictive variables including the terrain and biophysical factors (S1S2L8plus) achieved the highest model performance (R2: 0.80, RMSE: 154.98 g/m2) among all the models. Red-edge related-spectral indices derived from S2 were proved to be important predictors in AGB modelling. The spatial uncertainty quantified by QRF showed the spatial prediction uncertainties of AGB models based on S2S2L8plus and S2 were lower than AGB model based on S1L8. The results of this study demonstrate the suitability of optical remote sensing data especially S2 and the weak capability of S1 in modelling AGB in coastal wetlands of the YRD. The regularly modelling, mapping and uncertainty estimations of AGB could help guide the sustainable blue carbon management in coastal wetlands.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Informatics
Ecological Informatics 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
11.80%
发文量
346
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The journal Ecological Informatics is devoted to the publication of high quality, peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of computational ecology, data science and biogeography. The scope of the journal takes into account the data-intensive nature of ecology, the growing capacity of information technology to access, harness and leverage complex data as well as the critical need for informing sustainable management in view of global environmental and climate change. The nature of the journal is interdisciplinary at the crossover between ecology and informatics. It focuses on novel concepts and techniques for image- and genome-based monitoring and interpretation, sensor- and multimedia-based data acquisition, internet-based data archiving and sharing, data assimilation, modelling and prediction of ecological data.
期刊最新文献
Metric learning unveiling disparities: A novel approach to recognize false trigger images in wildlife monitoring Estimating vegetation aboveground biomass in Yellow River Delta coastal wetlands using Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 imagery Integrating circuit theory and network modeling to identify ecosystem carbon sequestration service flow networks Divergent dynamics of surface water patterns and structures in Europe's coastal-zone basins SPREAD: A large-scale, high-fidelity synthetic dataset for multiple forest vision tasks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1