Characteristics of environmental efficiency for different types of contaminated sites in China

IF 7.1 3区 材料科学 Q1 GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Materials Today Sustainability Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1016/j.mtsust.2025.101092
Xiufeng Ni , Chao Jiang , Fangming Jiang , Huan Luo , Yu Diao , Fan Jiang , Qingyu Zhang , Jinnan Wang
{"title":"Characteristics of environmental efficiency for different types of contaminated sites in China","authors":"Xiufeng Ni ,&nbsp;Chao Jiang ,&nbsp;Fangming Jiang ,&nbsp;Huan Luo ,&nbsp;Yu Diao ,&nbsp;Fan Jiang ,&nbsp;Qingyu Zhang ,&nbsp;Jinnan Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.mtsust.2025.101092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The assessment of the environmental efficiency of contaminated sites is important to address funding issues and ensure the sustainability of redevelopment in remediation and risk control actions. This study aims to gauge the environmental efficiency of remediation and risk control (EERRC) levels in China. It utilizes the super-efficiency directional distance function and metafrontier model to estimate metafrontier and group frontier EERRC across 408 contaminated sites spanning 27 provincial administrative regions. These sites were categorized based on economic development levels and industry types. This study dissects inefficiency factors into technological gaps and managerial inefficiencies while also analyzing the impact of site categorical attributes and the correlation between remediation and risk control strategies and EERRC. Findings indicate that China's overall EERRC average under the metafrontier stands at 0.524, contrasting with 0.902 under the group frontier, showcasing crucial technological gaps among regions and industries. Notably, industries such as metal smelting and processing, energy processing and supply, and textile and tanning exhibit low EERRC owing to their high technological complexity and compound contamination of heavy metals and semi-volatile organic compounds. Regions with low economic development are advised to prioritize more effective risk control measures over indiscriminate remediation efforts. Moreover, this study suggests that repurposing contaminated sites for uses such as storage land or sensitive land (e.g., residential or public administration and service) in terms of land planning. The EERRC assessment is instrumental in formulating cleanup and redevelopment strategies tailored to diverse types of contaminated sites.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18322,"journal":{"name":"Materials Today Sustainability","volume":"30 ","pages":"Article 101092"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials Today Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589234725000211","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The assessment of the environmental efficiency of contaminated sites is important to address funding issues and ensure the sustainability of redevelopment in remediation and risk control actions. This study aims to gauge the environmental efficiency of remediation and risk control (EERRC) levels in China. It utilizes the super-efficiency directional distance function and metafrontier model to estimate metafrontier and group frontier EERRC across 408 contaminated sites spanning 27 provincial administrative regions. These sites were categorized based on economic development levels and industry types. This study dissects inefficiency factors into technological gaps and managerial inefficiencies while also analyzing the impact of site categorical attributes and the correlation between remediation and risk control strategies and EERRC. Findings indicate that China's overall EERRC average under the metafrontier stands at 0.524, contrasting with 0.902 under the group frontier, showcasing crucial technological gaps among regions and industries. Notably, industries such as metal smelting and processing, energy processing and supply, and textile and tanning exhibit low EERRC owing to their high technological complexity and compound contamination of heavy metals and semi-volatile organic compounds. Regions with low economic development are advised to prioritize more effective risk control measures over indiscriminate remediation efforts. Moreover, this study suggests that repurposing contaminated sites for uses such as storage land or sensitive land (e.g., residential or public administration and service) in terms of land planning. The EERRC assessment is instrumental in formulating cleanup and redevelopment strategies tailored to diverse types of contaminated sites.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国不同类型污染场地的环境效益特征
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.40%
发文量
174
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Materials Today Sustainability is a multi-disciplinary journal covering all aspects of sustainability through materials science. With a rapidly increasing population with growing demands, materials science has emerged as a critical discipline toward protecting of the environment and ensuring the long term survival of future generations.
期刊最新文献
Characteristics of environmental efficiency for different types of contaminated sites in China Electrochemical CO2 reduction: Advances, insights, challenges, and future directions Xanthan gum biopolymer for uniform dispersion of halloysite nanotubes to enhance micro- and macroscopic performance of cementitious composite: A sustainable alternative to chemical surfactants Sustainable CFRP drilling using support plates: A comprehensive analysis of delamination suppression and cost-effectiveness Trends and perspectives on bacterial nanocellulose: A comprehensive analysis from the three helixes of innovation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1