Costs of biomarker testing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a global study comparing next-generation sequencing and single-gene testing

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY Journal of Pathology Clinical Research Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1002/2056-4538.70018
Umberto Malapelle, Chien-Chin Chen, Enrique de Álava, Paul Hofman, Daniel Kazdal, Tae-Jung Kim, Tony Kiat Hon Lim, Aleš Ryška, Angelica A Saetta, Ed Schuuring, Giancarlo Troncone, Michele Biscuola, Yi-Lin Chen, Gek San Tan, Charles Hugo Marquette, Maria Michelli, Arja ter Elst, Hana Vošmiková, Joshua Kapp, Sebastian Gonzalez-McQuire, Andromachi Giannopoulou, Jean Marie Franzini, Victoria Lucia Rabsiun Aramburu, Anna Baggi, Albrecht Stenzinger
{"title":"Costs of biomarker testing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a global study comparing next-generation sequencing and single-gene testing","authors":"Umberto Malapelle,&nbsp;Chien-Chin Chen,&nbsp;Enrique de Álava,&nbsp;Paul Hofman,&nbsp;Daniel Kazdal,&nbsp;Tae-Jung Kim,&nbsp;Tony Kiat Hon Lim,&nbsp;Aleš Ryška,&nbsp;Angelica A Saetta,&nbsp;Ed Schuuring,&nbsp;Giancarlo Troncone,&nbsp;Michele Biscuola,&nbsp;Yi-Lin Chen,&nbsp;Gek San Tan,&nbsp;Charles Hugo Marquette,&nbsp;Maria Michelli,&nbsp;Arja ter Elst,&nbsp;Hana Vošmiková,&nbsp;Joshua Kapp,&nbsp;Sebastian Gonzalez-McQuire,&nbsp;Andromachi Giannopoulou,&nbsp;Jean Marie Franzini,&nbsp;Victoria Lucia Rabsiun Aramburu,&nbsp;Anna Baggi,&nbsp;Albrecht Stenzinger","doi":"10.1002/2056-4538.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Current European/US guidelines recommend that molecular testing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) be performed using next-generation sequencing (NGS). However, the global uptake of NGS is limited, largely owing to reimbursement constraints. We compared real-world costs of NGS and single-gene testing (SGT) in nonsquamous aNSCLC. This observational study was conducted across 10 pathology centers in 10 different countries worldwide. Biomarker data collected via structured questionnaires (1 January–31 December 2021) were used to feed micro-costing analyses for three scenarios [‘Starting Point’ (SP; 2021–2022), ‘Current Practice’ (CP; 2023–2024), and ‘Future Horizons’ (FH; 2025–2028)] in both a real-world model, comprising all biomarkers tested by each center, and a standardized model, comprising the same sets of biomarkers across centers. Testing costs (including retesting) encompassed personnel costs, consumables, equipment, and overheads. Overall, 4,491 patients with aNSCLC were evaluated. Mean per-patient costs decreased for NGS relative to SGT over time, with real-world model costs 18% lower for NGS than for SGT in the SP scenario, and 26% lower for NGS than for SGT in the CP scenario. Mean per-biomarker costs also decreased over time for NGS relative to SGT. In the standardized model, the tipping point for the minimum number of biomarkers required for NGS to result in cost savings (per patient) was 10 and 12 in the SP and CP scenarios, respectively. Retesting had a negligible impact on cost analyses, and results were robust to variation in cost parameters. This study provides robust real-world global evidence for cost savings with NGS-based panels over SGT to evaluate predictive biomarkers in nonsquamous aNSCLC when the number of biomarkers to be tested exceeds 10. Widespread adoption of NGS may enable more efficient use of limited healthcare resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":48612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/2056-4538.70018","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2056-4538.70018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current European/US guidelines recommend that molecular testing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) be performed using next-generation sequencing (NGS). However, the global uptake of NGS is limited, largely owing to reimbursement constraints. We compared real-world costs of NGS and single-gene testing (SGT) in nonsquamous aNSCLC. This observational study was conducted across 10 pathology centers in 10 different countries worldwide. Biomarker data collected via structured questionnaires (1 January–31 December 2021) were used to feed micro-costing analyses for three scenarios [‘Starting Point’ (SP; 2021–2022), ‘Current Practice’ (CP; 2023–2024), and ‘Future Horizons’ (FH; 2025–2028)] in both a real-world model, comprising all biomarkers tested by each center, and a standardized model, comprising the same sets of biomarkers across centers. Testing costs (including retesting) encompassed personnel costs, consumables, equipment, and overheads. Overall, 4,491 patients with aNSCLC were evaluated. Mean per-patient costs decreased for NGS relative to SGT over time, with real-world model costs 18% lower for NGS than for SGT in the SP scenario, and 26% lower for NGS than for SGT in the CP scenario. Mean per-biomarker costs also decreased over time for NGS relative to SGT. In the standardized model, the tipping point for the minimum number of biomarkers required for NGS to result in cost savings (per patient) was 10 and 12 in the SP and CP scenarios, respectively. Retesting had a negligible impact on cost analyses, and results were robust to variation in cost parameters. This study provides robust real-world global evidence for cost savings with NGS-based panels over SGT to evaluate predictive biomarkers in nonsquamous aNSCLC when the number of biomarkers to be tested exceeds 10. Widespread adoption of NGS may enable more efficient use of limited healthcare resources.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pathology Clinical Research
Journal of Pathology Clinical Research Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
47
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research and The Journal of Pathology serve as translational bridges between basic biomedical science and clinical medicine with particular emphasis on, but not restricted to, tissue based studies. The focus of The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research is the publication of studies that illuminate the clinical relevance of research in the broad area of the study of disease. Appropriately powered and validated studies with novel diagnostic, prognostic and predictive significance, and biomarker discover and validation, will be welcomed. Studies with a predominantly mechanistic basis will be more appropriate for the companion Journal of Pathology.
期刊最新文献
Costs of biomarker testing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a global study comparing next-generation sequencing and single-gene testing Oncocytic and spindle cell typical carcinoids of lung: different immunophenotype and biological behavior Enhancing HER2 testing in breast cancer: predicting fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) scores from immunohistochemistry images via deep learning Association between individual Warburg-related proteins and prognosis in colorectal cancer Comprehensive transcriptomic profiling reveals molecular characteristics and biomarkers associated with risk stratification in papillary thyroid carcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1