Maternal urinary fluoride levels of a large pregnancy cohort in the United States: findings from the ADORE study.

IF 10.1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Health Perspectives Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1289/EHP14711
Adrianne K Griebel-Thompson, Scott Sands, Lynn Chollet-Hinton, Danielle Christifano, Debra K Sullivan, Holly Hull, Juliana Teruel Camargo, Susan E Carlson
{"title":"Maternal urinary fluoride levels of a large pregnancy cohort in the United States: findings from the ADORE study.","authors":"Adrianne K Griebel-Thompson, Scott Sands, Lynn Chollet-Hinton, Danielle Christifano, Debra K Sullivan, Holly Hull, Juliana Teruel Camargo, Susan E Carlson","doi":"10.1289/EHP14711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emerging evidence has suggested negative associations between maternal urinary fluoride adjusted for specific gravity (MUFsg) and offspring IQ. Two prior studies report the MUFsg of pregnant women in the US, both in California, and more information is needed on population levels of MUFsg.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary objective was to measure MUFsg in a large pregnancy cohort of women recruited from health departments and academic hospitals in Ohio and Kansas. A secondary objective was to compare associations between water fluoridation level and estimated fluoride intake from tap water, and MUFsg.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pregnant women (n=965) from the ADORE (Assessment of DHA on Reducing Early Preterm Birth) cohort provided a urine sample and dietary assessment, at enrollment, between 14-20 weeks gestation. MUFsg was measured by fluoride-sensitive electrode and corrected for specific gravity. Water fluoridation levels were obtained for public water systems (PWS), matched to participant residence, and multiplied by their tap water intake from dietary assessment. The association between MUFsg and water fluoridation level was estimated using a generalized linear model with gamma distribution and log link.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MUFsg (median: 1.0 mg/L, Q1, Q3: 0.6, 1.5) was correlated with PWS fluoridation (r<sub>s</sub>=0.30, p<0.01) and self-reported tap water consumption (r<sub>s</sub>=0.29, p<0.01). For 87% of the cohort, MUFsg was above the 0.45 mg/L safety benchmark for pregnancy proposed in a previous study. Similarly, 76.7% lived in areas with PWS fluoridation ≥0.7 mg/L. The median MUFsg (1.0 mg/L; Q1, Q3: 0.7, 1.5) of those living in areas with PWS fluoridation level ≥0.7 mg/L was higher than the median MUFsg (0.8 mg/L; Q1, Q3: 0.5, 1.2) of women living in areas with PWS fluoridation <0.7 mg/L (p<0.01).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>MUFsg in this population of midwestern US women exceeds the safety benchmark for pregnancy. While we cannot account for all sources of fluoride, MUFsg was correlated to PWS fluoridation. Because so many exceeded the safety benchmark for MUFsg, there is a need for MUFsg evaluation in other US regions, especially where the PWS fluoridation exceeds US Department of Health and Human Services recommendations (≥0.7 mg/L). https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14711.</p>","PeriodicalId":11862,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health Perspectives","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Health Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14711","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Emerging evidence has suggested negative associations between maternal urinary fluoride adjusted for specific gravity (MUFsg) and offspring IQ. Two prior studies report the MUFsg of pregnant women in the US, both in California, and more information is needed on population levels of MUFsg.

Objectives: The primary objective was to measure MUFsg in a large pregnancy cohort of women recruited from health departments and academic hospitals in Ohio and Kansas. A secondary objective was to compare associations between water fluoridation level and estimated fluoride intake from tap water, and MUFsg.

Methods: Pregnant women (n=965) from the ADORE (Assessment of DHA on Reducing Early Preterm Birth) cohort provided a urine sample and dietary assessment, at enrollment, between 14-20 weeks gestation. MUFsg was measured by fluoride-sensitive electrode and corrected for specific gravity. Water fluoridation levels were obtained for public water systems (PWS), matched to participant residence, and multiplied by their tap water intake from dietary assessment. The association between MUFsg and water fluoridation level was estimated using a generalized linear model with gamma distribution and log link.

Results: MUFsg (median: 1.0 mg/L, Q1, Q3: 0.6, 1.5) was correlated with PWS fluoridation (rs=0.30, p<0.01) and self-reported tap water consumption (rs=0.29, p<0.01). For 87% of the cohort, MUFsg was above the 0.45 mg/L safety benchmark for pregnancy proposed in a previous study. Similarly, 76.7% lived in areas with PWS fluoridation ≥0.7 mg/L. The median MUFsg (1.0 mg/L; Q1, Q3: 0.7, 1.5) of those living in areas with PWS fluoridation level ≥0.7 mg/L was higher than the median MUFsg (0.8 mg/L; Q1, Q3: 0.5, 1.2) of women living in areas with PWS fluoridation <0.7 mg/L (p<0.01).

Discussion: MUFsg in this population of midwestern US women exceeds the safety benchmark for pregnancy. While we cannot account for all sources of fluoride, MUFsg was correlated to PWS fluoridation. Because so many exceeded the safety benchmark for MUFsg, there is a need for MUFsg evaluation in other US regions, especially where the PWS fluoridation exceeds US Department of Health and Human Services recommendations (≥0.7 mg/L). https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14711.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Health Perspectives
Environmental Health Perspectives 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
388
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) is a monthly peer-reviewed journal supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, part of the National Institutes of Health under the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Its mission is to facilitate discussions on the connections between the environment and human health by publishing top-notch research and news. EHP ranks third in Public, Environmental, and Occupational Health, fourth in Toxicology, and fifth in Environmental Sciences.
期刊最新文献
Quantifying the source-receptor relationships of PM2.5 pollution and associated health impacts among China, South Korea, and Japan: A dual perspective and an interdisciplinary approach. Evaluation of Fusarium Mycotoxins and Fungal Metabolites in Seized Cannabis in Arizona and California, 2023-2024. Comment on "Exposure to Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances and Mortality in U.S. Adults: A Population-Based Cohort Study". Erratum: "Determinants of PFOA serum half-life after end of exposure: a longitudinal study on highly exposed subjects in the Veneto Region". Response to "Comment on 'Exposure to Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances and Mortality in U.S. Adults: A Population-Based Cohort Study'".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1