Transcarotid artery revascularization in symptomatic carotid stenosis: a systematic review.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE International Angiology Pub Date : 2025-03-06 DOI:10.23736/S0392-9590.24.05275-1
Francisco Garcia, Filipa Jácome, Joel Sousa, Armando Mansilha
{"title":"Transcarotid artery revascularization in symptomatic carotid stenosis: a systematic review.","authors":"Francisco Garcia, Filipa Jácome, Joel Sousa, Armando Mansilha","doi":"10.23736/S0392-9590.24.05275-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Carotid endarterectomy is currently the gold standard treatment option for significant symptomatic carotid stenosis. Carotid artery stenting can be an alternative in selected patients, although with inferior results when compared with its open counterpart. Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) emerged as a new option, with promising results. This study aims to systematically review current evidence of the safety of TCAR in patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A systematic review of the literature was performed, according to PRISMA guidelines. Literature search was performed on the PubMed and Web of Science databases, which returned 178 studies. Eleven studies were selected. Data were extracted using predefined forms.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>A total of 28326 symptomatic patients undergoing TCAR were included for analysis. Reported TIA/stroke rates after TCAR ranged between 2.3-3.3% in-hospital and 1.2-4.3% at 30-days. Similarly, in-hospital post-operative mortality was reported in 0.5-0.7% of the cases, and 1-4.9% at 30 days. After 1 year, TIA/Stroke and death rates ranged between 3.5-3.7% and 2.5-13%, respectively. Postoperative cardiovascular events were observed in up to 2.9% of the patients among the included studies. Cranial nerve injuries were reported in up to 0.7% of the cases, while surgical and vascular access complications ranged between 1.2-6.1%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TCAR has shown promising results for significant symptomatic carotid stenosis treatment, and may be a relevant alternative to carotid endarterectomy, especially in high-risk patients. Further studies are required to assess the effectiveness of TCAR and its comparability with carotid endarterectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":13709,"journal":{"name":"International Angiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.24.05275-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Carotid endarterectomy is currently the gold standard treatment option for significant symptomatic carotid stenosis. Carotid artery stenting can be an alternative in selected patients, although with inferior results when compared with its open counterpart. Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) emerged as a new option, with promising results. This study aims to systematically review current evidence of the safety of TCAR in patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis.

Evidence acquisition: A systematic review of the literature was performed, according to PRISMA guidelines. Literature search was performed on the PubMed and Web of Science databases, which returned 178 studies. Eleven studies were selected. Data were extracted using predefined forms.

Evidence synthesis: A total of 28326 symptomatic patients undergoing TCAR were included for analysis. Reported TIA/stroke rates after TCAR ranged between 2.3-3.3% in-hospital and 1.2-4.3% at 30-days. Similarly, in-hospital post-operative mortality was reported in 0.5-0.7% of the cases, and 1-4.9% at 30 days. After 1 year, TIA/Stroke and death rates ranged between 3.5-3.7% and 2.5-13%, respectively. Postoperative cardiovascular events were observed in up to 2.9% of the patients among the included studies. Cranial nerve injuries were reported in up to 0.7% of the cases, while surgical and vascular access complications ranged between 1.2-6.1%.

Conclusions: TCAR has shown promising results for significant symptomatic carotid stenosis treatment, and may be a relevant alternative to carotid endarterectomy, especially in high-risk patients. Further studies are required to assess the effectiveness of TCAR and its comparability with carotid endarterectomy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Angiology
International Angiology 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
28.60%
发文量
89
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Angiology publishes scientific papers on angiology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work. Duties and responsibilities of all the subjects involved in the editorial process are summarized at Publication ethics. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).
期刊最新文献
Transcarotid artery revascularization in symptomatic carotid stenosis: a systematic review. Building evidence for diagnosis of lipedema: using a classification and regression tree (CART) algorithm to differentiate lipedema from lymphedema patients. How much volume of iodinated contrast medium leads to acute kidney injury in endovascular aortic repair? Pregnancy as a possible reason for recurrent varicosity after laser crossectomy. Lower extremity arterial disease perspective: IUA consensus document on "LEAD management". Part 2.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1