The role of narratives in promoting vaccine confidence among Indigenous peoples in Canada, the United States, Australia, and New Zealand: a scoping review.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH International Journal for Equity in Health Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1186/s12939-025-02424-3
Robert Martell, Maurianne Reade, Lisa Boesch, Davinder P Kaur, Sandeep Kumar, Michael McArthur, Marion A Maar
{"title":"The role of narratives in promoting vaccine confidence among Indigenous peoples in Canada, the United States, Australia, and New Zealand: a scoping review.","authors":"Robert Martell, Maurianne Reade, Lisa Boesch, Davinder P Kaur, Sandeep Kumar, Michael McArthur, Marion A Maar","doi":"10.1186/s12939-025-02424-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many Indigenous youth and young adults in Canada, the United States, Australia, and New Zealand have reported low vaccine confidence, which has been linked to lower vaccination rates for COVID-19, MMR, HPV, DTaP-IPV-Hib, and pneumococcal conjugate vaccines. Narrative-based health promotion approaches, including those focused on strengthening vaccine confidence, have been used in public health interventions. Scoping reviews have become increasingly valued for their rigorous and reproducible exploration of evidence in public health research. The aim of this scoping review was to understand the extent and types of evidence related to the facilitators, challenges, and benefits of narrative-based health promotion approaches in vaccine confidence interventions within Indigenous populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review adhered to the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines for scoping reviews using Covidence online software to streamline the review process. Database searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and PubMed, as well as Google search to identify both academic and gray literature articles on the role of narratives in promoting vaccine confidence published between January 2000 and April 2024. Charted data were ranked in a numerical summary and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. The review process embraced a two-eyed seeing approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The searches identified 306 records. After the screening process, 45 sources (35 peer-reviewed articles, eight gray literature, and two preprint articles) were included in the final review. The key facilitators of narrative-based approaches to promote vaccine confidence were community engagement, tailored and culturally safe interventions, and trusted messengers and sources of information. The challenges discussed in the literature were linked to mistrust of government and healthcare services and to misinformation narratives. The most frequently reported benefits were the development of community-based resources, culturally safe and relevant interventions, building trust and respectful relationships, and improved vaccination rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review confirmed the important contribution of narrative-based health promotion approaches in strengthening vaccine confidence among Indigenous populations. This finding underscores the importance of respecting Indigenous sovereignty and engaging community perspectives to repair trust and improve vaccination rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"63"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11884110/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02424-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many Indigenous youth and young adults in Canada, the United States, Australia, and New Zealand have reported low vaccine confidence, which has been linked to lower vaccination rates for COVID-19, MMR, HPV, DTaP-IPV-Hib, and pneumococcal conjugate vaccines. Narrative-based health promotion approaches, including those focused on strengthening vaccine confidence, have been used in public health interventions. Scoping reviews have become increasingly valued for their rigorous and reproducible exploration of evidence in public health research. The aim of this scoping review was to understand the extent and types of evidence related to the facilitators, challenges, and benefits of narrative-based health promotion approaches in vaccine confidence interventions within Indigenous populations.

Methods: This review adhered to the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines for scoping reviews using Covidence online software to streamline the review process. Database searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and PubMed, as well as Google search to identify both academic and gray literature articles on the role of narratives in promoting vaccine confidence published between January 2000 and April 2024. Charted data were ranked in a numerical summary and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. The review process embraced a two-eyed seeing approach.

Results: The searches identified 306 records. After the screening process, 45 sources (35 peer-reviewed articles, eight gray literature, and two preprint articles) were included in the final review. The key facilitators of narrative-based approaches to promote vaccine confidence were community engagement, tailored and culturally safe interventions, and trusted messengers and sources of information. The challenges discussed in the literature were linked to mistrust of government and healthcare services and to misinformation narratives. The most frequently reported benefits were the development of community-based resources, culturally safe and relevant interventions, building trust and respectful relationships, and improved vaccination rates.

Conclusion: This review confirmed the important contribution of narrative-based health promotion approaches in strengthening vaccine confidence among Indigenous populations. This finding underscores the importance of respecting Indigenous sovereignty and engaging community perspectives to repair trust and improve vaccination rates.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
叙述在提高加拿大、美国、澳大利亚和新西兰土著居民对疫苗的信心中的作用:范围界定审查。
背景:加拿大、美国、澳大利亚和新西兰的许多土著青年和年轻人报告说,他们对疫苗的信心较低,这与COVID-19、MMR、HPV、dtap - ipvv - hib和肺炎球菌结合疫苗的接种率较低有关。以叙述为基础的健康促进方法,包括侧重于加强疫苗信心的方法,已用于公共卫生干预措施。范围审查因其在公共卫生研究中对证据进行严格和可重复的探索而日益受到重视。本范围审查的目的是了解与土著人口疫苗信心干预中基于叙述的健康促进方法的促进因素、挑战和益处相关的证据的程度和类型。方法:本综述遵循乔安娜·布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute, JBI)使用covid在线软件进行范围审查的指南,以简化审查过程。在MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science、PsycINFO和PubMed进行数据库搜索,以及谷歌搜索,以确定2000年1月至2024年4月期间发表的关于叙事在促进疫苗信心方面作用的学术和灰色文献文章。图表数据在数值汇总中排名,并使用定性内容分析进行分析。审查过程采用了两只眼睛观察的方法。结果:搜索确定了306条记录。经过筛选过程,45个来源(35篇同行评议文章、8篇灰色文献和2篇预印本文章)被纳入最终评审。以叙述为基础的方法促进疫苗信心的关键促进因素是社区参与、量身定制且在文化上安全的干预措施以及可信赖的信使和信息来源。文献中讨论的挑战与对政府和保健服务的不信任以及错误的信息叙述有关。最常报告的益处是开发基于社区的资源、文化上安全和相关的干预措施、建立信任和尊重关系以及提高疫苗接种率。结论:本综述证实了基于叙事的健康促进方法在加强土著人口对疫苗的信心方面的重要贡献。这一发现强调了尊重土著主权和吸收社区观点对修复信任和提高疫苗接种率的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.
期刊最新文献
Advancing equity and value in United States healthcare: an umbrella review. Implementation gaps in the two-finger test ban in medico-legal evidence collection on rape: a qualitative study in three districts of Bangladesh. Mandated capacity reductions created new gender disparities in liver cancer surveillance: a population-based cohort study. Providing training and support to Spanish dementia caregivers living in rural and urban areas: insights and results from the iSupport-Sp study. Gender innovation in the scientific evidence on interventions to reduce health inequalities in Europe: an umbrella review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1