Effective Management of Panfacial Fractures in a Craniofacial Trauma Center: A Retrospective Study.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Journal of Craniofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-06 DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000011159
Héctor Omar Malagón Hidalgo, Fernán Alejandra Ayala Ugalde, Fernando González Magaña, Stéphane Paolo Guerrero Zambrano, José Gustavo Blas Mondragón, Ángel Octavio Molina González, Miguel Alexander Cálix García
{"title":"Effective Management of Panfacial Fractures in a Craniofacial Trauma Center: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Héctor Omar Malagón Hidalgo, Fernán Alejandra Ayala Ugalde, Fernando González Magaña, Stéphane Paolo Guerrero Zambrano, José Gustavo Blas Mondragón, Ángel Octavio Molina González, Miguel Alexander Cálix García","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Panfacial fractures are caused by high-impact trauma and represent the most severe injuries to the face. The combination of these fractures determines the treatment strategy. The objective of this study was to analyze the treatment protocol for panfacial fractures at the Centro Médico ISSEMYM, to describe a new proposed protocol for the management of panfacial fractures and analyze the complication rate associated with this protocol.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Eighteen patients with panfacial fractures were treated between January 2014 and June 2024. After clinical and radiological examination, patients with panfacial fractures defined as: fractures of at least 2 of the 3 facial thirds: upper facial third, middle facial third, and lower facial third were included in this study. The authors reviewed in-hospital medical records to collect data on the medical history, cause of injury, fracture location, treatment sequence, postoperative complications, duration of hospital stay, and computed tomography scans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average age of patients was 45 years. The etiology of trauma was predominantly traffic accidents. A total of 108 fractures were recorded in 18 patients. Eight patients (44%) had frontal fractures (7%), 13 patients (72%) had mandibular fractures (18%), and all patients had fractures of midface in different combinations. Postoperatively, buccal occlusion was satisfactory. Computed tomography scans were taken to assess the adequacy of fracture reduction and fixation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The sequence used in the authors' center is safe, reliable and has shown adequate results, and also allows for adequate correction for this type of trauma in a single surgical procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011159","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Panfacial fractures are caused by high-impact trauma and represent the most severe injuries to the face. The combination of these fractures determines the treatment strategy. The objective of this study was to analyze the treatment protocol for panfacial fractures at the Centro Médico ISSEMYM, to describe a new proposed protocol for the management of panfacial fractures and analyze the complication rate associated with this protocol.

Patients and methods: Eighteen patients with panfacial fractures were treated between January 2014 and June 2024. After clinical and radiological examination, patients with panfacial fractures defined as: fractures of at least 2 of the 3 facial thirds: upper facial third, middle facial third, and lower facial third were included in this study. The authors reviewed in-hospital medical records to collect data on the medical history, cause of injury, fracture location, treatment sequence, postoperative complications, duration of hospital stay, and computed tomography scans.

Results: The average age of patients was 45 years. The etiology of trauma was predominantly traffic accidents. A total of 108 fractures were recorded in 18 patients. Eight patients (44%) had frontal fractures (7%), 13 patients (72%) had mandibular fractures (18%), and all patients had fractures of midface in different combinations. Postoperatively, buccal occlusion was satisfactory. Computed tomography scans were taken to assess the adequacy of fracture reduction and fixation.

Conclusion: The sequence used in the authors' center is safe, reliable and has shown adequate results, and also allows for adequate correction for this type of trauma in a single surgical procedure.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
期刊最新文献
A Unique Emissary Foramen: The Far Anterior Paracondylar Foramen. Changes in Nasal Morphometry With Aging for a More Accurate Rhinoplasty. Managing Complications in Facial Cosmetic Treatment. Early Outcomes of Endoscopic Spring-Assisted Repair of Metopic Craniosynostosis. Effective Management of Panfacial Fractures in a Craniofacial Trauma Center: A Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1