The role of first pass effect in mechanical thrombectomy for vertebrobasilar artery occlusion: a comprehensive meta-analysis of prevalence, outcomes, and predictive factors.

IF 4.3 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1136/jnis-2024-022960
Lei Guo, Jun Zhang, Jianhong Wang, Shu Yang, Yang Xiang, Fuqiang Guo
{"title":"The role of first pass effect in mechanical thrombectomy for vertebrobasilar artery occlusion: a comprehensive meta-analysis of prevalence, outcomes, and predictive factors.","authors":"Lei Guo, Jun Zhang, Jianhong Wang, Shu Yang, Yang Xiang, Fuqiang Guo","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2024-022960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>First-pass effect (FPE) is crucial for better outcomes in mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute large vessel occlusions. However, its frequency and predictors in vertebrobasilar artery occlusion (VBAO) remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the incidence of FPE in MT for VBAO and its impact on key clinical outcomes. Additionally, to explore potential predictors of achieving FPE, addressing critical knowledge gaps and providing evidence to optimize treatment strategies for patients with VBAO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library up to November 1, 2024. Studies evaluating FPE in patients with acute VBAO undergoing MT were included. The prevalence of FPE was estimated using a meta-analysis of proportions, and associations with clinical outcomes and predictive factors were assessed using pooled ORs with random-effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty studies involving 4315 patients met inclusion criteria. The overall prevalence of FPE in patients with VBAO was 41% (95% CI 33% to 50%). FPE was significantly associated with improved 90-day outcomes (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0-2: OR=2.00, 95% CI 1.45 to 2.75; mRS score 0-3: OR=2.33, 95% CI 1.78 to 3.04), reduced risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR=0.49, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.87), and lower mortality (OR=0.43, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.57). The results showed that significant positive predictors of FPE included female sex, atrial fibrillation, cardioembolic or unknown stroke etiology, mid- or distal basilar artery occlusion, contact aspiration techniques, and the use of larger catheters. Conversely, negative predictors were identified as a history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack, higher baseline NIHSS scores, prolonged procedure time, and the use of general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Achieving FPE in acute VBAO is strongly associated with improved clinical outcomes. Important clinical, procedural, and anatomical factors related to FPE were identified, aiding clinical decisions and thrombectomy techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2024-022960","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: First-pass effect (FPE) is crucial for better outcomes in mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute large vessel occlusions. However, its frequency and predictors in vertebrobasilar artery occlusion (VBAO) remain unclear.

Objective: To conduct a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the incidence of FPE in MT for VBAO and its impact on key clinical outcomes. Additionally, to explore potential predictors of achieving FPE, addressing critical knowledge gaps and providing evidence to optimize treatment strategies for patients with VBAO.

Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library up to November 1, 2024. Studies evaluating FPE in patients with acute VBAO undergoing MT were included. The prevalence of FPE was estimated using a meta-analysis of proportions, and associations with clinical outcomes and predictive factors were assessed using pooled ORs with random-effects models.

Results: Twenty studies involving 4315 patients met inclusion criteria. The overall prevalence of FPE in patients with VBAO was 41% (95% CI 33% to 50%). FPE was significantly associated with improved 90-day outcomes (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0-2: OR=2.00, 95% CI 1.45 to 2.75; mRS score 0-3: OR=2.33, 95% CI 1.78 to 3.04), reduced risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR=0.49, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.87), and lower mortality (OR=0.43, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.57). The results showed that significant positive predictors of FPE included female sex, atrial fibrillation, cardioembolic or unknown stroke etiology, mid- or distal basilar artery occlusion, contact aspiration techniques, and the use of larger catheters. Conversely, negative predictors were identified as a history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack, higher baseline NIHSS scores, prolonged procedure time, and the use of general anesthesia.

Conclusion: Achieving FPE in acute VBAO is strongly associated with improved clinical outcomes. Important clinical, procedural, and anatomical factors related to FPE were identified, aiding clinical decisions and thrombectomy techniques.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
椎基底动脉闭塞的机械取栓术中首过效应的作用:关于流行率、结果和预测因素的综合荟萃分析。
背景:首过效应(FPE)对于急性大血管闭塞机械取栓(MT)的预后至关重要。然而,其在椎基底动脉闭塞(VBAO)中的频率和预测因素尚不清楚。目的:通过全面的系统回顾和荟萃分析,评估VBAO患者MT中FPE的发生率及其对关键临床结局的影响。此外,探讨实现FPE的潜在预测因素,解决关键知识空白,并为优化VBAO患者的治疗策略提供证据。方法:系统检索截至2024年11月1日的PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science和Cochrane Library的文献。纳入了评估急性VBAO患者行MT的FPE的研究。使用比例的荟萃分析估计FPE的患病率,并使用随机效应模型的合并or评估与临床结果和预测因素的关联。结果:20项研究共纳入4315例患者符合纳入标准。VBAO患者中FPE的总体患病率为41% (95% CI为33%至50%)。FPE与改善的90天预后显著相关(改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分0-2:OR=2.00, 95% CI 1.45至2.75;mRS评分0-3:OR=2.33, 95% CI 1.78 ~ 3.04),降低症状性颅内出血的风险(OR=0.49, 95% CI 0.27 ~ 0.87),降低死亡率(OR=0.43, 95% CI 0.32 ~ 0.57)。结果显示,FPE的显著阳性预测因素包括女性、房颤、心脏栓塞或未知的卒中病因、基底动脉中或远端闭塞、接触抽吸技术和使用更大的导管。相反,高血压、高脂血症、中风或短暂性脑缺血发作史、较高的NIHSS基线评分、延长的手术时间和全身麻醉的使用被确定为阴性预测因素。结论:急性VBAO患者实现FPE与临床预后改善密切相关。确定了与FPE相关的重要临床、手术和解剖学因素,有助于临床决策和取栓技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
14.60%
发文量
291
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.
期刊最新文献
Bioresorbable magnesium flow diverter promotes early aneurysm occlusion in rabbits. Post-marketing study of patients to evaluate NIMBUS revascularization effectiveness with challenging occlusions (SPERO): study results. Efficacy of carotid devices for resistant hypertension: a systematic review. Silk Vista Baby for intracranial aneurysms: systematic review and proportional meta-analysis. Cone beam CT-guided biopsy of a petrous apex lesion via the contralateral subzygomatic transclival approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1