Considering the ethics of live tissue training in trauma surgery.

IF 3.4 2区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS Journal of Medical Ethics Pub Date : 2025-12-14 DOI:10.1136/jme-2023-109761
Cara Swain, Rory Rickard, Klas Karlgren, Gert Helgesson
{"title":"Considering the ethics of live tissue training in trauma surgery.","authors":"Cara Swain, Rory Rickard, Klas Karlgren, Gert Helgesson","doi":"10.1136/jme-2023-109761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>'Live tissue training', using an anaesthetised live animal substituted for a human patient for the practice of surgical skills, is a controversial topic. Although simulator technologies have developed significantly for inclusion in many areas of surgical education, it is contested that training to manage traumatic injuries requires a model that can bleed and has a dynamic circulation. This article uses the published literature to explore the values at stake regarding live tissue training in the context of trauma with the aim of considering whether such training is ethically justifiable, to any degree. We present criteria for the ethical evaluation of live animal use in trauma simulation alongside descriptions of the pro- and contra-arguments present in the literature. Our conclusion is that justification is challenging and must be considered on a case-by-case basis-it is important that the difference gained from using a live animal compared with the best alternative simulator has to be greater than the clear ethical downside of using animals.</p>","PeriodicalId":16317,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Ethics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2023-109761","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

'Live tissue training', using an anaesthetised live animal substituted for a human patient for the practice of surgical skills, is a controversial topic. Although simulator technologies have developed significantly for inclusion in many areas of surgical education, it is contested that training to manage traumatic injuries requires a model that can bleed and has a dynamic circulation. This article uses the published literature to explore the values at stake regarding live tissue training in the context of trauma with the aim of considering whether such training is ethically justifiable, to any degree. We present criteria for the ethical evaluation of live animal use in trauma simulation alongside descriptions of the pro- and contra-arguments present in the literature. Our conclusion is that justification is challenging and must be considered on a case-by-case basis-it is important that the difference gained from using a live animal compared with the best alternative simulator has to be greater than the clear ethical downside of using animals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创伤外科活体组织训练的伦理思考。
“活体组织训练”是指用麻醉过的活体动物代替人类患者进行手术技巧练习,这是一个有争议的话题。尽管模拟器技术已经在外科教育的许多领域得到了显著的发展,但对于创伤性损伤管理的培训需要一个可以流血和具有动态循环的模型,这是有争议的。本文利用已发表的文献来探讨在创伤背景下进行活体组织训练的价值,目的是考虑这种训练在任何程度上是否在道德上是合理的。我们提出了在创伤模拟中使用活体动物的伦理评估标准,以及文献中存在的赞成和反对观点的描述。我们的结论是,理由是具有挑战性的,必须在个案的基础上考虑——重要的是,与最好的替代模拟器相比,使用活体动物获得的差异必须大于使用动物的明显的道德缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Ethics
Journal of Medical Ethics 医学-医学:伦理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
164
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Ethics is a leading international journal that reflects the whole field of medical ethics. The journal seeks to promote ethical reflection and conduct in scientific research and medical practice. It features articles on various ethical aspects of health care relevant to health care professionals, members of clinical ethics committees, medical ethics professionals, researchers and bioscientists, policy makers and patients. Subscribers to the Journal of Medical Ethics also receive Medical Humanities journal at no extra cost. JME is the official journal of the Institute of Medical Ethics.
期刊最新文献
There is no consequentialist ethical justification for registries of conscientious non-objectors. Pragmatic defence of the register system: strengthening Clarke's consequentialist case for managing conscientious objection. Guest editorial: Accommodating cultural differences in the International Conference of Harmonisation Good Clinical Practice guidelines. From AI SIM to AI twinning: a spectrum of digital representations of persons. Moral universe of Muslim healthcare practitioners in the UK: balancing Islamic and secular ethics in palliative and end-of-life care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1