Improving cervical cancer screening rates at a Federally Qualified Health Center.

Lauren A McCann, Marjorie Kozlowski, Michelle Martinez
{"title":"Improving cervical cancer screening rates at a Federally Qualified Health Center.","authors":"Lauren A McCann, Marjorie Kozlowski, Michelle Martinez","doi":"10.1097/JXX.0000000000001118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women. Early detection with screening methods can help to prevent mortality.</p><p><strong>Local problem: </strong>Cervical cancer screening is below national standards at a Midwest Federally Qualified Health Center and may compromise future funding. A manual chart review of cervical cancer screening was compared with an electronic health record-generated report and found results from outside facilities accounted for 27% of the metric's underperformance. This quality improvement project aimed to improve the Uniform Data System performance for cervical cancer screening at a specific health center from 46.3% to 79.2% by July 2024.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Implementation, guided by the Improvement Model and Lewin's Change Theory, included (1) analysis of cervical cancer screening underperformance, (2) sharing data with key stakeholders, and (3) creating tip sheets for chart reconciliation.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Interventions consisted of (1) auditing and reconciling charts from Epic's generated reports, (2) modifying the frequency of or discontinuing Pap smears, (3) updating surgical history to reflect hysterectomy type, and (4) sending scheduling outreach messages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As of March 2024, cervical cancer screening 2023 percentages increased by ≥9% for each quarter and by 8.7% for year-to-date at the Midwest health center. The quality metric's quarter 1 and 2, 2024 data increased by 4% and 3% as of July 2024.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the target goal was not reached in the designated time frame, the percentage increase proves that implementation of a chart reconciliation workflow can improve rates for cervical cancer screening at a Federally Qualified Health Center.</p>","PeriodicalId":17179,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JXX.0000000000001118","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women. Early detection with screening methods can help to prevent mortality.

Local problem: Cervical cancer screening is below national standards at a Midwest Federally Qualified Health Center and may compromise future funding. A manual chart review of cervical cancer screening was compared with an electronic health record-generated report and found results from outside facilities accounted for 27% of the metric's underperformance. This quality improvement project aimed to improve the Uniform Data System performance for cervical cancer screening at a specific health center from 46.3% to 79.2% by July 2024.

Methods: Implementation, guided by the Improvement Model and Lewin's Change Theory, included (1) analysis of cervical cancer screening underperformance, (2) sharing data with key stakeholders, and (3) creating tip sheets for chart reconciliation.

Interventions: Interventions consisted of (1) auditing and reconciling charts from Epic's generated reports, (2) modifying the frequency of or discontinuing Pap smears, (3) updating surgical history to reflect hysterectomy type, and (4) sending scheduling outreach messages.

Results: As of March 2024, cervical cancer screening 2023 percentages increased by ≥9% for each quarter and by 8.7% for year-to-date at the Midwest health center. The quality metric's quarter 1 and 2, 2024 data increased by 4% and 3% as of July 2024.

Conclusions: Although the target goal was not reached in the designated time frame, the percentage increase proves that implementation of a chart reconciliation workflow can improve rates for cervical cancer screening at a Federally Qualified Health Center.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
16.70%
发文量
172
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners (JAANP) is a monthly peer-reviewed professional journal that serves as the official publication of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners. Published since 1989, the JAANP provides a strong clinical focus with articles related to primary, secondary, and tertiary care, nurse practitioner education, health policy, ethics and ethical issues, and health care delivery. The journal publishes original research, integrative/comprehensive reviews, case studies, a variety of topics in clinical practice, and theory-based articles related to patient and professional education. Although the majority of nurse practitioners function in primary care, there is an increasing focus on the provision of care across all types of systems from acute to long-term care settings.
期刊最新文献
Improving cervical cancer screening rates at a Federally Qualified Health Center. Improving oral health screening and dental referrals for patients with diabetes in a community health clinic. Icodec ONWARDS: A review of the first once-weekly diabetes treatment for nurse practitioners and physician assistants. A case study of hypophosphatasia: An underdiagnosed bone disorder characterized by low alkaline phosphatase. Medication reconciliation in the outpatient primary care setting: Barriers and opportunities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1