Real-world application of Short Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy (STPP) as chronic migraine preventive therapy: Profiling responders and predictive factors.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurological Sciences Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-06 DOI:10.1007/s10072-025-08075-0
Alessandro Viganò, Barbara Petolicchio, Massimiliano Toscano, Sonia Ruggero, Romina Di Giambattista, Marta Puma, Jacopo Lanzone, Angelo Bellinvia, Nicholas Diani, Matteo Castaldo, Chiara Valota, Rita De Sanctis, Paola Tiberio, Marta Altieri, Edmond Gilliéron, Vittorio Di Piero
{"title":"Real-world application of Short Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy (STPP) as chronic migraine preventive therapy: Profiling responders and predictive factors.","authors":"Alessandro Viganò, Barbara Petolicchio, Massimiliano Toscano, Sonia Ruggero, Romina Di Giambattista, Marta Puma, Jacopo Lanzone, Angelo Bellinvia, Nicholas Diani, Matteo Castaldo, Chiara Valota, Rita De Sanctis, Paola Tiberio, Marta Altieri, Edmond Gilliéron, Vittorio Di Piero","doi":"10.1007/s10072-025-08075-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Among non-pharmacological approach for chronic migraine (CM), Short-Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy (STPP) is suggested in CM and, particularly, in interrupting medication overuse (MO). In this study, we aim at identifying clinical predictive factors to identify CM patients who could more likely respond to STPP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a prospective real-world observational study on CM patients undergoing STPP. We collected clinical data related to migraine burden (baseline headache days, number of acute medications used, MIDAS, HIT-6), as well as psychiatric comorbidities (though MINI) and mentalization level obtained by the STPP first interview phase (called BPI) to use them as predictive factors by univariate and discriminant function analysis at 3 (early) and 6 months (only sustained response).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited 119 patients (mean age 39.90 ± 14.4, F = 102); 113(94%) completed the STPP treatment. All patients presented a low-to-intermediate mentalization level. After stand-alone STPP, we observed a reduction in monthly headache days and MO at 3 months. Mentalization level didn't affect the STPP outcome (p = 0.40). Early response was directly related to a higher baseline headache days number, the previous used of alternative therapies, and higher Hamilton Depression scale scores. Sustained response was predicted by current use of preventive therapy, pain intensity, HIT-6 score, hypomania, and dysthymia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This real-world study showed that STPP could represent a valid therapeutic option in complex CM patients with a high number of headache days and comorbid depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":19191,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"2727-2736"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-025-08075-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Among non-pharmacological approach for chronic migraine (CM), Short-Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy (STPP) is suggested in CM and, particularly, in interrupting medication overuse (MO). In this study, we aim at identifying clinical predictive factors to identify CM patients who could more likely respond to STPP.

Methods: We designed a prospective real-world observational study on CM patients undergoing STPP. We collected clinical data related to migraine burden (baseline headache days, number of acute medications used, MIDAS, HIT-6), as well as psychiatric comorbidities (though MINI) and mentalization level obtained by the STPP first interview phase (called BPI) to use them as predictive factors by univariate and discriminant function analysis at 3 (early) and 6 months (only sustained response).

Results: We recruited 119 patients (mean age 39.90 ± 14.4, F = 102); 113(94%) completed the STPP treatment. All patients presented a low-to-intermediate mentalization level. After stand-alone STPP, we observed a reduction in monthly headache days and MO at 3 months. Mentalization level didn't affect the STPP outcome (p = 0.40). Early response was directly related to a higher baseline headache days number, the previous used of alternative therapies, and higher Hamilton Depression scale scores. Sustained response was predicted by current use of preventive therapy, pain intensity, HIT-6 score, hypomania, and dysthymia.

Conclusion: This real-world study showed that STPP could represent a valid therapeutic option in complex CM patients with a high number of headache days and comorbid depression.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
短期心理动力治疗(STPP)作为慢性偏头痛预防治疗的实际应用:分析反应者和预测因素。
简介:在慢性偏头痛(CM)的非药物治疗方法中,短期心理动力治疗(STPP)被建议用于慢性偏头痛,特别是用于中断药物过度使用(MO)。在本研究中,我们旨在确定临床预测因素,以确定更可能对STPP有反应的CM患者。方法:我们设计了一项对CM患者进行STPP的前瞻性现实观察研究。我们收集了与偏头痛负担相关的临床数据(基线头痛天数,使用的急性药物数量,MIDAS, HIT-6),以及精神合并症(尽管MINI)和STPP第一次访谈阶段(称为BPI)获得的精神化水平(称为BPI),通过单变量和判别函数分析将其作为预测因素3(早期)和6个月(仅持续反应)。结果:纳入119例患者(平均年龄39.90±14.4岁,F = 102);113例(94%)完成了STPP治疗。所有患者的心理化水平均为中低水平。在独立STPP后,我们观察到每月头痛天数和MO在3个月时减少。心理化水平对STPP结果无显著影响(p = 0.40)。早期反应与较高的基线头痛天数、先前使用的替代疗法和较高的汉密尔顿抑郁量表得分直接相关。通过目前使用的预防性治疗、疼痛强度、HIT-6评分、轻度躁狂和心境恶劣来预测持续反应。结论:这项现实世界的研究表明,STPP可能是一种有效的治疗选择,用于复杂CM患者的头痛天数和合并症抑郁症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurological Sciences
Neurological Sciences 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
743
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Neurological Sciences is intended to provide a medium for the communication of results and ideas in the field of neuroscience. The journal welcomes contributions in both the basic and clinical aspects of the neurosciences. The official language of the journal is English. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications, editorials, reviews and letters to the editor. Original articles present the results of experimental or clinical studies in the neurosciences, while short communications are succinct reports permitting the rapid publication of novel results. Original contributions may be submitted for the special sections History of Neurology, Health Care and Neurological Digressions - a forum for cultural topics related to the neurosciences. The journal also publishes correspondence book reviews, meeting reports and announcements.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of digital health technologies as adjunctive functional training in occupational therapy for stroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis. Early anti-C5 therapy in NMOSD: rationale and clinical evidence. The association between prescribed hormonal contraception and multiple sclerosis risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Machine learning -driven discovery of Parkinsonian-like phenotypes in idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder. p. His110Asn: confirmation of pathological ATTRv variant.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1