Long-term outcomes of a bioactive matrix enriched with an autologous platelet concentrate for the treatment of complex anal fistulae.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Techniques in Coloproctology Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1007/s10151-024-03102-2
I Maya, E Spada, M Martí-Gallostra, A Cirera de Tudela, G Pellino, E Espín-Basany
{"title":"Long-term outcomes of a bioactive matrix enriched with an autologous platelet concentrate for the treatment of complex anal fistulae.","authors":"I Maya, E Spada, M Martí-Gallostra, A Cirera de Tudela, G Pellino, E Espín-Basany","doi":"10.1007/s10151-024-03102-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treating complex anal fistulae (CAF) remains a clinical challenge. Regenerative fistula treatment (RFT) with a bioactive matrix enriched with autologous platelet concentrate (Obsidian RFT®) has shown potential in healing CAF while preserving continence, but its long-term efficacy is still debated. This study aims to report the outcomes of RFT in patients with CAF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of a prospective database of patients with CAF treated with RFT between February 2021 and November 2023 at a single center was conducted. Patients were included if they completed at least a 6-month follow-up. The primary outcome was fistula healing at last available follow-up. Secondary outcomes included unscheduled reoperation and anorectal function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 31 patients were treated with Obsidian RFT, 17 of whom completed the 6-month follow-up. Nine of the patients were women. The median age was 47 (24-63) years, and eight had inflammatory bowel disease. High transsphincteric fistulae were observed in 52.9% of patients. At a median follow-up of 21.8 (8-36) months, a 53% success rate was achieved. Approximately half of patients required at least one additional procedure owing to CAF persistence or recurrence. There were no reports of morbidity or mortality, and no worsening of continence was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This pilot study demonstrated that nearly half of the patients treated with RFT for CAF achieved long-term healing, with no adverse effects on continence and an excellent safety profile. Larger studies are needed to draw definitive conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"29 1","pages":"73"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11882651/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-024-03102-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Treating complex anal fistulae (CAF) remains a clinical challenge. Regenerative fistula treatment (RFT) with a bioactive matrix enriched with autologous platelet concentrate (Obsidian RFT®) has shown potential in healing CAF while preserving continence, but its long-term efficacy is still debated. This study aims to report the outcomes of RFT in patients with CAF.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of a prospective database of patients with CAF treated with RFT between February 2021 and November 2023 at a single center was conducted. Patients were included if they completed at least a 6-month follow-up. The primary outcome was fistula healing at last available follow-up. Secondary outcomes included unscheduled reoperation and anorectal function.

Results: A total of 31 patients were treated with Obsidian RFT, 17 of whom completed the 6-month follow-up. Nine of the patients were women. The median age was 47 (24-63) years, and eight had inflammatory bowel disease. High transsphincteric fistulae were observed in 52.9% of patients. At a median follow-up of 21.8 (8-36) months, a 53% success rate was achieved. Approximately half of patients required at least one additional procedure owing to CAF persistence or recurrence. There were no reports of morbidity or mortality, and no worsening of continence was observed.

Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrated that nearly half of the patients treated with RFT for CAF achieved long-term healing, with no adverse effects on continence and an excellent safety profile. Larger studies are needed to draw definitive conclusions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
富含自体浓缩血小板的生物活性基质治疗复杂肛瘘的长期疗效。
背景:治疗复杂肛瘘(CAF)仍然是一个临床挑战。利用富含自体浓缩血小板的生物活性基质(Obsidian RFT®)进行再生瘘管治疗(RFT)已显示出在保留尿失禁的同时治疗CAF的潜力,但其长期疗效仍存在争议。本研究旨在报道CAF患者RFT的结果。方法:对2021年2月至2023年11月单中心接受RFT治疗的CAF患者前瞻性数据库进行回顾性分析。如果患者完成了至少6个月的随访,则纳入研究。最后随访的主要结果是瘘管愈合。次要结果包括未计划的再手术和肛门直肠功能。结果:共有31例患者接受了Obsidian RFT治疗,其中17例完成了6个月的随访。其中9名患者是女性。中位年龄为47岁(24-63岁),其中8例患有炎症性肠病。52.9%的患者出现高括约肌瘘。中位随访时间为21.8(8-36)个月,成功率为53%。由于CAF持续存在或复发,大约一半的患者需要至少一次额外的手术。没有发病率或死亡率的报告,也没有观察到尿失禁的恶化。结论:这项初步研究表明,近一半接受RFT治疗的CAF患者实现了长期愈合,对尿失禁没有不良影响,并且具有良好的安全性。需要更大规模的研究才能得出明确的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Techniques in Coloproctology
Techniques in Coloproctology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
176
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Techniques in Coloproctology is an international journal fully devoted to diagnostic and operative procedures carried out in the management of colorectal diseases. Imaging, clinical physiology, laparoscopy, open abdominal surgery and proctoperineology are the main topics covered by the journal. Reviews, original articles, technical notes and short communications with many detailed illustrations render this publication indispensable for coloproctologists and related specialists. Both surgeons and gastroenterologists are represented on the distinguished Editorial Board, together with pathologists, radiologists and basic scientists from all over the world. The journal is strongly recommended to those who wish to be updated on recent developments in the field, and improve the standards of their work. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1965 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted. Reports of animal experiments must state that the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care (NIH publication no. 86-23 revised 1985) were followed as were applicable national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals). The Editor-in-Chief reserves the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. Authors will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill such requirements.
期刊最新文献
Development of a convolutional neural network for the endoscopic classification of pouchitis in patients after restorative proctocolectomy. The clinical effect and oncological results of preserving inferior mesenteric artery during laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision for patients with descending colon cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis. Surgical preference and outcomes in pilonidal sinus disease: a national multicenter study evaluating complications, recurrence, and quality of life (PISI TURKEY). Novel adjunctive technologies for the prevention of colorectal anastomotic leakage: a systematic review. Evaluating the clinical use and safety of LumenEye in an outpatient colorectal clinic: a single-centre retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1