An artificial intelligence tool that may assist with interpretation of rapid plasma reagin test for syphilis: development and on-site evaluation.

IF 14.3 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Journal of Infection Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jinf.2025.106454
Jiaxuan Jin, Yan Han, Yueping Yin, Bangyong Zhu, Guanqun Wang, Wenjie Lu, Hongchun Wang, Kai Chen, Xiaoyu Zhu, Wenqi Xu, Hedan Yang, Xiangsheng Chen, Yin Yang, Tong Lin
{"title":"An artificial intelligence tool that may assist with interpretation of rapid plasma reagin test for syphilis: development and on-site evaluation.","authors":"Jiaxuan Jin, Yan Han, Yueping Yin, Bangyong Zhu, Guanqun Wang, Wenjie Lu, Hongchun Wang, Kai Chen, Xiaoyu Zhu, Wenqi Xu, Hedan Yang, Xiangsheng Chen, Yin Yang, Tong Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.jinf.2025.106454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The rapid plasma reagin (RPR) test, a traditional method for diagnosing syphilis and evaluating treatment efficacy, relies on subjective interpretation and requires high technical proficiency. This study aimed to develop and validate a user-friendly RPR-artificial intelligence (AI) interpretative tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A dataset comprising 600 images of photographed RPR cards from 276 negative and 223 positive RPR samples was used for model development. The reference result was based on consistent interpretations by at least two out of three experienced laboratory personnel. Then an interpretative model was developed using deep learning algorithms and loaded into smartphones for on-site interpretation at two clinical centers from October 2023 to April 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model demonstrated an accuracy of 82·67% (95% CI 71·82%-90·09%) for reactive circles and 84·44% (95% CI 69·94%-93·01%) for non-reactive circles. In the field study, 669 specimens showed a sensitivity of 94·85% (95% CI 89·29%-97·73%), specificity of 91·56% (95% CI 88·78%-93·71%), and concordance of 92·23% (95% CI 89·87%-94·09%). The positive predictive value was 74·14% (95% CI 66·86%-80·33%) and negative predictive value was 98.59% (95% CI 96·98%-99·38%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The tool assists in RPR interpretation standardization, enabling data traceability, and quality control for remote and underdeveloped areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":50180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection","volume":" ","pages":"106454"},"PeriodicalIF":14.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2025.106454","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The rapid plasma reagin (RPR) test, a traditional method for diagnosing syphilis and evaluating treatment efficacy, relies on subjective interpretation and requires high technical proficiency. This study aimed to develop and validate a user-friendly RPR-artificial intelligence (AI) interpretative tool.

Methods: A dataset comprising 600 images of photographed RPR cards from 276 negative and 223 positive RPR samples was used for model development. The reference result was based on consistent interpretations by at least two out of three experienced laboratory personnel. Then an interpretative model was developed using deep learning algorithms and loaded into smartphones for on-site interpretation at two clinical centers from October 2023 to April 2024.

Results: The model demonstrated an accuracy of 82·67% (95% CI 71·82%-90·09%) for reactive circles and 84·44% (95% CI 69·94%-93·01%) for non-reactive circles. In the field study, 669 specimens showed a sensitivity of 94·85% (95% CI 89·29%-97·73%), specificity of 91·56% (95% CI 88·78%-93·71%), and concordance of 92·23% (95% CI 89·87%-94·09%). The positive predictive value was 74·14% (95% CI 66·86%-80·33%) and negative predictive value was 98.59% (95% CI 96·98%-99·38%).

Conclusions: The tool assists in RPR interpretation standardization, enabling data traceability, and quality control for remote and underdeveloped areas.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Infection
Journal of Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
45.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
475
审稿时长
16 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Infection publishes original papers on all aspects of infection - clinical, microbiological and epidemiological. The Journal seeks to bring together knowledge from all specialties involved in infection research and clinical practice, and present the best work in the ever-changing field of infection. Each issue brings you Editorials that describe current or controversial topics of interest, high quality Reviews to keep you in touch with the latest developments in specific fields of interest, an Epidemiology section reporting studies in the hospital and the general community, and a lively correspondence section.
期刊最新文献
A human-infecting H10N5 avian influenza virus: clinical features, virus reassortment, receptor-binding affinity, and possible transmission routes. Identification of Lesion Bioactivity in Hepatic Cystic Echinococcosis Using a Transformer-Based Fusion Model. The spread of CTX-M-type extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in China: Epidemiology and evolutionary analyses Host-derived Delta-like Canonical Notch ligand-1 in sepsis and septic shock: Infection site, pathogens and disease severity matter – Secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial An artificial intelligence tool that may assist with interpretation of rapid plasma reagin test for syphilis: development and on-site evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1