Satisfaction des patientes concernant l’accompagnement par hypnose lors de la ponction d’ovocytes sous anesthésie locale

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1016/j.gofs.2025.02.006
Célie Cervantes , Mathilde Bourdon , Chloé Maignien , Giulia Galducci , Catherine Patrat , Valérie Blanchet , Julia Gonnot , Audrey Houliat , Emmanuelle Laviron , Charles Chapron , Pietro Santulli
{"title":"Satisfaction des patientes concernant l’accompagnement par hypnose lors de la ponction d’ovocytes sous anesthésie locale","authors":"Célie Cervantes ,&nbsp;Mathilde Bourdon ,&nbsp;Chloé Maignien ,&nbsp;Giulia Galducci ,&nbsp;Catherine Patrat ,&nbsp;Valérie Blanchet ,&nbsp;Julia Gonnot ,&nbsp;Audrey Houliat ,&nbsp;Emmanuelle Laviron ,&nbsp;Charles Chapron ,&nbsp;Pietro Santulli","doi":"10.1016/j.gofs.2025.02.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the satisfaction of patients accompanied by hypnosis during oocyte retrieval under local anesthesia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cohort study included patients undergoing oocyte retrieval under local anesthesia with hypnotic support provided either by a hypnotherapist or via a virtual reality headset between November 2022 and November 2023. A questionnaire was distributed after the procedure, assessing satisfaction with hypnosis for pain and anxiety management, as well as the experience of pain (visual analog scale) and anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory) during the procedure. Incomplete questionnaires and non-French-speaking patients were excluded from the analysis. The two methods of hypnosis were compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 600 eligible women, 209 (34.8%) were included (mean age : 34.4<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4.1 years). Hypnosis was conducted by a hypnotherapist for 167 patients (79.9%) and via a virtual reality headset for 42 patients (20.1%). Satisfaction with pain management was reported by 73.7% of the participants, and with anxiety management by 86.1%. Significantly more women found hypnosis beneficial for anxiety in the hypnotherapist group compared to the virtual reality group (148/167 [88.6%] versus 32/42 [76.2%], <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.04). The mean visual analog scale score was 5.3<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->2.6, and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory score during the oocyte retrieval was 36.7<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->17.8. No significant differences were found between the two groups for these scores.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Women who received hypnosis during oocyte retrieval under local anesthesia were generally satisfied with this support, finding it beneficial for pain and anxiety management. Further research is needed to optimize the patient experience during this stressful procedure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56056,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie","volume":"53 6","pages":"Pages 292-297"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468718925000613","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the satisfaction of patients accompanied by hypnosis during oocyte retrieval under local anesthesia.

Methods

This cohort study included patients undergoing oocyte retrieval under local anesthesia with hypnotic support provided either by a hypnotherapist or via a virtual reality headset between November 2022 and November 2023. A questionnaire was distributed after the procedure, assessing satisfaction with hypnosis for pain and anxiety management, as well as the experience of pain (visual analog scale) and anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory) during the procedure. Incomplete questionnaires and non-French-speaking patients were excluded from the analysis. The two methods of hypnosis were compared.

Results

Out of 600 eligible women, 209 (34.8%) were included (mean age : 34.4 ± 4.1 years). Hypnosis was conducted by a hypnotherapist for 167 patients (79.9%) and via a virtual reality headset for 42 patients (20.1%). Satisfaction with pain management was reported by 73.7% of the participants, and with anxiety management by 86.1%. Significantly more women found hypnosis beneficial for anxiety in the hypnotherapist group compared to the virtual reality group (148/167 [88.6%] versus 32/42 [76.2%], P = 0.04). The mean visual analog scale score was 5.3 ± 2.6, and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory score during the oocyte retrieval was 36.7 ± 17.8. No significant differences were found between the two groups for these scores.

Conclusions

Women who received hypnosis during oocyte retrieval under local anesthesia were generally satisfied with this support, finding it beneficial for pain and anxiety management. Further research is needed to optimize the patient experience during this stressful procedure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[局部麻醉下催眠辅助卵母细胞提取患者满意度]。
目的:评价局部麻醉下伴催眠取卵患者的满意度。方法:该队列研究纳入了2022年11月至2023年11月期间在催眠治疗师或虚拟现实耳机提供催眠支持的局部麻醉下进行卵母细胞提取的患者。手术后发放问卷,评估催眠对疼痛和焦虑管理的满意度,以及过程中的疼痛体验(视觉模拟量表)和焦虑体验(状态-特质焦虑量表)。不完整的问卷和非法语患者被排除在分析之外。比较两种催眠方法。结果:在600名符合条件的女性中,209名(34.8%)被纳入,平均年龄:34.4±4.1岁。167名患者(79.9%)由催眠治疗师进行催眠,42名患者(20.1%)通过虚拟现实耳机进行催眠。73.7%的参与者对疼痛管理感到满意,86.1%的参与者对焦虑管理感到满意。与虚拟现实组相比,催眠治疗师组中有更多的女性发现催眠对焦虑有益(148/167[88.6%]对32/42 [76.2%],p=0.04)。视觉模拟量表平均得分为5.3±2.6分,取卵过程中状态-特质焦虑量表得分为36.7±17.8分。两组在这些分数上没有发现显著差异。结论:在局部麻醉下接受催眠术的妇女对这种支持普遍满意,发现它有利于疼痛和焦虑的管理。需要进一步的研究来优化患者在这一紧张过程中的体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie
Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertilité & Sénologie est un mensuel scientifique d''information et de formation destiné aux gynécologues, aux obstétriciens, aux sénologues et aux biologistes de la reproduction. La revue, dans ses éditoriaux, articles originaux, mises au point, lettres à la rédaction et autres rubriques, donne une information actualisée ayant trait à l''obstétrique et à la gynécologie et aux différentes spécialités développées à partir de ces deux pôles : médecine de la reproduction, médecine maternelle et fœtale, périnatalité, endocrinologie, chirurgie gynécologique, cancérologie pelvienne, sénologie, sexualité, psychosomatique…
期刊最新文献
[Therapeutic management of tubal ectopic pregnancies: Clinical practice guidelines of CNGOF and SCGP]. [Preexisting diabetes: Expert consensus from the College of French Gynecologists and Obstetricians and from the French Society of Diabetology]. [Feto-maternal hemorrhage: Guidelines of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Expert consensus from a Delphi method]. [CNGOF statement on instrumental vaginal deliveries using vacuum extraction]. [Delivery of twin pregnancies: Guidelines from the College of French Gynecologists and Obstetricians].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1