Baseline Pathological Liver Function Tests in Patients With Psoriasis Support the Indication for Systemic Therapy Rather Than Being a Reason Against It: A Real-World Analysis.

IF 5.2 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Psoriasis (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2025-03-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PTT.S502296
Frederik Krefting, Cosima Scheib, Sven Benson, Stefanie Hölsken, Jan-Malte Placke, Heiner Wedemeyer, Wiebke Sondermann
{"title":"Baseline Pathological Liver Function Tests in Patients With Psoriasis Support the Indication for Systemic Therapy Rather Than Being a Reason Against It: A Real-World Analysis.","authors":"Frederik Krefting, Cosima Scheib, Sven Benson, Stefanie Hölsken, Jan-Malte Placke, Heiner Wedemeyer, Wiebke Sondermann","doi":"10.2147/PTT.S502296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Modern systemic therapies offer a high probability of significant improvement for psoriasis. However, elevated liver function tests (LFTs) may cause physicians to be reluctant to initiate systemic treatment. Especially considering the already increased risk of liver disease in patients with psoriasis, clinicians are often concerned about potential further liver damage caused by systemic therapies. The aim of this study was to provide real-world evidence to address this issue.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study retrospectively analyzed the treatment courses of N = 278 patients with psoriasis who received systemic anti-psoriatic therapy with secukinumab, ixekizumab, adalimumab, or apremilast in clinical routine. The cohort was divided into two subgroups based on normal or elevated LFTs prior to the start of therapy. AST, ALT, and GGT levels as well as Fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4) were measured at baseline, after 3 months, and after 6 months of therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The subgroup of patients with elevated LFTs had a higher mean PASI (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index), were more likely to be male, and had a higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome comorbidities compared to the subgroup with normal LFTs. During the follow-up period, there were no significant changes in LFTs and FIB-4 for the subgroup with normal LFTs at baseline. In the group of patients with initially elevated LFTs, all LFTs decreased significantly over time, whereas FIB-4 scores demonstrated no significant change. Drug survival, discontinuation rates, and PASI-75 response did not significantly differ between subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides real world evidence that systemic therapy with secukinumab, ixekizumab, adalimumab, or apremilast does not present a general risk, but rather an opportunity for patients with psoriasis with elevated LFTs at baseline.</p>","PeriodicalId":74589,"journal":{"name":"Psoriasis (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"15 ","pages":"29-44"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11881625/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psoriasis (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PTT.S502296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Modern systemic therapies offer a high probability of significant improvement for psoriasis. However, elevated liver function tests (LFTs) may cause physicians to be reluctant to initiate systemic treatment. Especially considering the already increased risk of liver disease in patients with psoriasis, clinicians are often concerned about potential further liver damage caused by systemic therapies. The aim of this study was to provide real-world evidence to address this issue.

Patients and methods: This study retrospectively analyzed the treatment courses of N = 278 patients with psoriasis who received systemic anti-psoriatic therapy with secukinumab, ixekizumab, adalimumab, or apremilast in clinical routine. The cohort was divided into two subgroups based on normal or elevated LFTs prior to the start of therapy. AST, ALT, and GGT levels as well as Fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4) were measured at baseline, after 3 months, and after 6 months of therapy.

Results: The subgroup of patients with elevated LFTs had a higher mean PASI (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index), were more likely to be male, and had a higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome comorbidities compared to the subgroup with normal LFTs. During the follow-up period, there were no significant changes in LFTs and FIB-4 for the subgroup with normal LFTs at baseline. In the group of patients with initially elevated LFTs, all LFTs decreased significantly over time, whereas FIB-4 scores demonstrated no significant change. Drug survival, discontinuation rates, and PASI-75 response did not significantly differ between subgroups.

Conclusion: This study provides real world evidence that systemic therapy with secukinumab, ixekizumab, adalimumab, or apremilast does not present a general risk, but rather an opportunity for patients with psoriasis with elevated LFTs at baseline.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Baseline Pathological Liver Function Tests in Patients With Psoriasis Support the Indication for Systemic Therapy Rather Than Being a Reason Against It: A Real-World Analysis. Successful Treatment of Linear Psoriasis With the IL-17a-Antagonist Ixekizumab: A Case Report. Shaping Treatment Expectation to Optimize Efficacy of Interleukin 17A Antagonist Secukinumab in Psoriasis Patients. Breakthrough Psoriasis in Patients Receiving Biologicals. Research Progress on Glycolysis Mechanism of Psoriasis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1