The Endolymph Signal in Non-contrast Enhanced 3D-real IR Image Differs between the Ears with and without Significant Endolymphatic Hydrops.

Shinji Naganawa, Rintaro Ito, Mariko Kawamura, Toshiaki Taoka, Tadao Yoshida, Michihiko Sone
{"title":"The Endolymph Signal in Non-contrast Enhanced 3D-real IR Image Differs between the Ears with and without Significant Endolymphatic Hydrops.","authors":"Shinji Naganawa, Rintaro Ito, Mariko Kawamura, Toshiaki Taoka, Tadao Yoshida, Michihiko Sone","doi":"10.2463/mrms.mp.2024-0191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate whether significant differences exist in labyrinthine lymph fluid signal intensities on non-contrast-enhanced 3D real inversion recovery (3D-real IR) images between patients with and without significant endolymphatic hydrops (EH), potentially enabling the non-contrast detection of EH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-nine patients suspected of having EH underwent 3D-real IR MRI before and 4 hours after intravenous administration of a single dose of gadobutrol. Signal intensities of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), perilymph, and endolymph were manually measured on pre-contrast images using ROIs. Patients were categorized into 2 groups based on post-contrast imaging: those with significant EH and those without. Normalized signal intensities (nSIs) of the endolymph were calculated and compared between the groups using the Mann-Whitney U test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The nSIs of the vestibular endolymph on non-contrast 3D-real IR images were significantly lower in the group with significant EH compared to the group without EH (P  < 0.05), suggesting T1 prolongation in the vestibular endolymph of patients with significant EH. However, considerable overlap was observed in the nSIs between the 2 groups, and significant EH did not always result in T1 prolongation. No significant differences were found in the nSIs of the perilymph or CSF between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study suggests that T1 prolongation occurs in the vestibular endolymph in cases of significant EH. This finding indicates the potential for developing non-contrast MRI methods to detect EH and underscores the importance of understanding the mechanisms behind T1 changes in the endolymph. Further research with larger patient cohorts and inclusion of healthy control subjects is necessary to validate these results and to elucidate the pathophysiology of EH in Ménière's disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":94126,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2024-0191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate whether significant differences exist in labyrinthine lymph fluid signal intensities on non-contrast-enhanced 3D real inversion recovery (3D-real IR) images between patients with and without significant endolymphatic hydrops (EH), potentially enabling the non-contrast detection of EH.

Methods: Thirty-nine patients suspected of having EH underwent 3D-real IR MRI before and 4 hours after intravenous administration of a single dose of gadobutrol. Signal intensities of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), perilymph, and endolymph were manually measured on pre-contrast images using ROIs. Patients were categorized into 2 groups based on post-contrast imaging: those with significant EH and those without. Normalized signal intensities (nSIs) of the endolymph were calculated and compared between the groups using the Mann-Whitney U test.

Results: The nSIs of the vestibular endolymph on non-contrast 3D-real IR images were significantly lower in the group with significant EH compared to the group without EH (P  < 0.05), suggesting T1 prolongation in the vestibular endolymph of patients with significant EH. However, considerable overlap was observed in the nSIs between the 2 groups, and significant EH did not always result in T1 prolongation. No significant differences were found in the nSIs of the perilymph or CSF between the groups.

Conclusion: The study suggests that T1 prolongation occurs in the vestibular endolymph in cases of significant EH. This finding indicates the potential for developing non-contrast MRI methods to detect EH and underscores the importance of understanding the mechanisms behind T1 changes in the endolymph. Further research with larger patient cohorts and inclusion of healthy control subjects is necessary to validate these results and to elucidate the pathophysiology of EH in Ménière's disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abbreviated and Ultrafast Dynamic Contrast-enhanced (DCE) MR Imaging. Preliminary Findings on Non-contrast Enhanced Positive Endolymph Images: Limited Delineation of Endolymphatic Space. The Endolymph Signal in Non-contrast Enhanced 3D-real IR Image Differs between the Ears with and without Significant Endolymphatic Hydrops. Predicting Mastoid Extension and Complications such as Labyrinthine Fistula and Dural Exposure in Middle Ear Cholesteatoma Using Lesion Size and Detectability on Non-echo-planar Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging. Improved Assessment of Juxtacortical Lesions in Multiple Sclerosis Using Highly-accelerated High-resolution Double Inversion Recovery MR Imaging with Deep Learning-based Reconstruction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1