Unpacking the docked bike-sharing experience. A bike-along study on the infrastructural constraints and determinants of everyday bike-sharing use

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of Transport Geography Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2025.104184
Oriol Roig-Costa , Carme Miralles-Guasch , Oriol Marquet
{"title":"Unpacking the docked bike-sharing experience. A bike-along study on the infrastructural constraints and determinants of everyday bike-sharing use","authors":"Oriol Roig-Costa ,&nbsp;Carme Miralles-Guasch ,&nbsp;Oriol Marquet","doi":"10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2025.104184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cycling for transportation is increasingly recognised as a core strategy to combat the climate emergency, particularly in urban environments. In this frame, bike-sharing systems offer a valuable opportunity to attract new users to cycling and promote sustainable mobility. However, the rapid growth in the use of these schemes has exposed critical gaps, such as insufficient cycling infrastructure, system saturation, or poor integration with other transport modes, which continue to hinder their full potential. By using a mobile methodology, we interviewed 17 docked bike-sharing users in Barcelona to explore how infrastructure and spatial dimensions shape riders' experiences. Our findings reveal that traffic safety - modulated by cycling infrastructure and network connectivity- strongly influences how users of shared bicycles perceive urban spaces. Furthermore, participants reported that features specific to shared bicycles, such as their design and maintenance, notably shaped their riding experiences. Beyond the act of cycling itself, our analysis highlights the importance of often-overlooked stages, such as the bike pick-up and return processes, in shaping users' overall experiences. These moments present logistical and accessibility challenges that could limit the consolidation and expansion of bike-sharing schemes. Policymakers and urban designers are likely to find these insights valuable, as they point to specific improvements that can enhance navigation and positively impact usability and overall user satisfaction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48413,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport Geography","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 104184"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport Geography","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692325000754","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cycling for transportation is increasingly recognised as a core strategy to combat the climate emergency, particularly in urban environments. In this frame, bike-sharing systems offer a valuable opportunity to attract new users to cycling and promote sustainable mobility. However, the rapid growth in the use of these schemes has exposed critical gaps, such as insufficient cycling infrastructure, system saturation, or poor integration with other transport modes, which continue to hinder their full potential. By using a mobile methodology, we interviewed 17 docked bike-sharing users in Barcelona to explore how infrastructure and spatial dimensions shape riders' experiences. Our findings reveal that traffic safety - modulated by cycling infrastructure and network connectivity- strongly influences how users of shared bicycles perceive urban spaces. Furthermore, participants reported that features specific to shared bicycles, such as their design and maintenance, notably shaped their riding experiences. Beyond the act of cycling itself, our analysis highlights the importance of often-overlooked stages, such as the bike pick-up and return processes, in shaping users' overall experiences. These moments present logistical and accessibility challenges that could limit the consolidation and expansion of bike-sharing schemes. Policymakers and urban designers are likely to find these insights valuable, as they point to specific improvements that can enhance navigation and positively impact usability and overall user satisfaction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
打开停靠的共享单车体验。共享单车日常使用的基础设施约束和决定因素研究
骑自行车作为交通工具越来越被认为是应对气候紧急情况的核心战略,特别是在城市环境中。在这个框架下,自行车共享系统提供了一个宝贵的机会来吸引新用户骑自行车,促进可持续的交通。然而,这些方案使用的快速增长暴露出了严重的差距,例如自行车基础设施不足、系统饱和或与其他交通方式的整合不足,这些问题继续阻碍它们充分发挥潜力。通过使用移动方法,我们采访了巴塞罗那的17名共享单车用户,以探索基础设施和空间维度如何塑造骑行者的体验。我们的研究结果表明,交通安全——由自行车基础设施和网络连接调节——强烈影响共享自行车用户对城市空间的感知。此外,参与者报告说,共享单车的特点,如设计和维护,明显影响了他们的骑行体验。除了骑自行车本身,我们的分析还强调了经常被忽视的阶段的重要性,比如取车和归还过程,在塑造用户的整体体验方面。这些时刻带来了物流和可达性方面的挑战,可能会限制自行车共享计划的整合和扩张。政策制定者和城市设计师可能会发现这些见解很有价值,因为它们指出了可以增强导航并对可用性和整体用户满意度产生积极影响的具体改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
11.50%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: A major resurgence has occurred in transport geography in the wake of political and policy changes, huge transport infrastructure projects and responses to urban traffic congestion. The Journal of Transport Geography provides a central focus for developments in this rapidly expanding sub-discipline.
期刊最新文献
Monitoring port congestion based on vessel stay behavior recognition: A case study of two US ports around COVID-19 pandemic Long or short-distance travel? Mobile phone data reveals how the built environment affects elderly travel patterns Multimodal transport path planning for New International Land-Sea Trade Corridor of China based on deep reinforcement learning Investigating intercity commuting using distance decay in a two-stage regression framework: A case study of Shenzhen Metropolitan Area in China From proximity to equity: Rethinking X-minute-city policies for accessibility equity through a spatial optimization perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1