Report of RILEM TC 301-ASR: Modelling the impact of SCMs, alkali level and w/b ratio on alkali concentration in pore solution

IF 3.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Materials and Structures Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1617/s11527-025-02583-3
Klaartje de Weerdt, Maxime Ranger, Miriam E. Krüger, Ana Bergmann, Petter Hemstad, Andreas Leemann, Barbara Lothenbach
{"title":"Report of RILEM TC 301-ASR: Modelling the impact of SCMs, alkali level and w/b ratio on alkali concentration in pore solution","authors":"Klaartje de Weerdt,&nbsp;Maxime Ranger,&nbsp;Miriam E. Krüger,&nbsp;Ana Bergmann,&nbsp;Petter Hemstad,&nbsp;Andreas Leemann,&nbsp;Barbara Lothenbach","doi":"10.1617/s11527-025-02583-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) can mitigate alkali-silica reaction by lowering the alkali metal concentration in the pore solution. This is a theoretical study on the applicability of a thermodynamic model (GEMS) and the empirical Taylor model to predict the required replacement level of portland cement (PC) by SCMs to achieve an alkali metal concentration below 300 mmol/L. The SCMs investigated are silica fume (SF), metakaolin (MK), fly ash (FA) and slag. The impact of the alkali content of the PC and the w/b ratio on the required replacement level is modelled and compared to experimental pore solution concentrations. Both models predict a similar impact of the SCM replacement level on the distribution of alkali between the pore solution, C–S–H and unreacted material. The thermodynamic model predicts little impact of the alkali content of PC and the w/b-ratio on the required replacement level, i.e., 20% SF, 20% MK, 40–50% FA and 60–70% slag. This is contrary to the Taylor model, which predicts that the replacement levels of FA and slag ranges from 7 to 58% when increasing the alkali content from 0.47 to 0.93% and from 80 to 10%, when increasing the w/b ratio from 0.3 to 0.9. The required replacement levels for SF and MK vary between 2 and 19% when increasing the alkali content from 0.47 to 0.93%, and from 40 to &lt; 5% when increasing the w/b ratio from 0.3 to 0.9. The main difference between the two models is how they account for the uptake of alkali metals by the C–S–H.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":691,"journal":{"name":"Materials and Structures","volume":"58 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1617/s11527-025-02583-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1617/s11527-025-02583-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) can mitigate alkali-silica reaction by lowering the alkali metal concentration in the pore solution. This is a theoretical study on the applicability of a thermodynamic model (GEMS) and the empirical Taylor model to predict the required replacement level of portland cement (PC) by SCMs to achieve an alkali metal concentration below 300 mmol/L. The SCMs investigated are silica fume (SF), metakaolin (MK), fly ash (FA) and slag. The impact of the alkali content of the PC and the w/b ratio on the required replacement level is modelled and compared to experimental pore solution concentrations. Both models predict a similar impact of the SCM replacement level on the distribution of alkali between the pore solution, C–S–H and unreacted material. The thermodynamic model predicts little impact of the alkali content of PC and the w/b-ratio on the required replacement level, i.e., 20% SF, 20% MK, 40–50% FA and 60–70% slag. This is contrary to the Taylor model, which predicts that the replacement levels of FA and slag ranges from 7 to 58% when increasing the alkali content from 0.47 to 0.93% and from 80 to 10%, when increasing the w/b ratio from 0.3 to 0.9. The required replacement levels for SF and MK vary between 2 and 19% when increasing the alkali content from 0.47 to 0.93%, and from 40 to < 5% when increasing the w/b ratio from 0.3 to 0.9. The main difference between the two models is how they account for the uptake of alkali metals by the C–S–H.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Materials and Structures
Materials and Structures 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
222
审稿时长
5.9 months
期刊介绍: Materials and Structures, the flagship publication of the International Union of Laboratories and Experts in Construction Materials, Systems and Structures (RILEM), provides a unique international and interdisciplinary forum for new research findings on the performance of construction materials. A leader in cutting-edge research, the journal is dedicated to the publication of high quality papers examining the fundamental properties of building materials, their characterization and processing techniques, modeling, standardization of test methods, and the application of research results in building and civil engineering. Materials and Structures also publishes comprehensive reports prepared by the RILEM’s technical committees.
期刊最新文献
Recommendation of RILEM TC 280-CBE: test method to assess the bonding of microsurfacing mixtures using the shear bond testing (SBT) apparatus Report of RILEM TC 301-ASR: Modelling the impact of SCMs, alkali level and w/b ratio on alkali concentration in pore solution RILEM TC 275-HDB: results of interlaboratory testing for determining capillarity properties of hemp concrete Fatigue resistance of concrete: influence of time-dependent scattering of compressive strength Biochar as a bio-renewable addition to enhance carbonation of reactive MgO cement based composites
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1