Single-stage ACL reconstruction and displaced bucket handle Meniscus repair is associated with lower Meniscus repair failure rates compared to two-stage surgery
Carolina Kekki, Riccardo Cristiani, Anders Stålman, Christoffer von Essen
{"title":"Single-stage ACL reconstruction and displaced bucket handle Meniscus repair is associated with lower Meniscus repair failure rates compared to two-stage surgery","authors":"Carolina Kekki, Riccardo Cristiani, Anders Stålman, Christoffer von Essen","doi":"10.1002/jeo2.70199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To compare displaced bucket-handle meniscus repair (BHMR) failure rates, subjective and objective knee function after BHMR in the setting of ACLR performed as a single-or two-stage procedure, and assess factors associated with BHMR survival.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective study included patients who underwent surgery between February 2015 and December 2021 at one institution. Patients with a displaced bucket-handle meniscus tear (BHMT) and ACL-injury undergoing BHMR and ACLR as a single- (concomitant BHMR and ACLR) or two-stage (BHMR and subsequent ACLR) procedure were identified. The primary outcome was the 2-year BHMR failure rate following ACLR, defined as reoperation with meniscus re-repair or resection. Additionally, 6-month range of motion (ROM), isokinetic knee (extension, flexion) strength, 1-and 2-year Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS), treatment failure (TF) were compared between the groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to assess BHMR survival, factors associated with repair survival were analysed through Cox proportional hazard regression analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The cohort included 159 displaced BHMRs, 120 (75.5%) underwent single-stage surgery. The overall BHMR failure rate was 27% (43/159). The single-stage surgery group had significantly lower failure rate (15% vs. 35.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.006). BHMT laterality, subjective (KOOS, PASS and TF) and objective (ROM, isokinetic strength) knee function did not differ significantly between the groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Patients who underwent single-stage displaced BHMR and ACLR had significantly lower BHMR failure rate compared to those who underwent two-stage surgery. Therefore, single-stage displaced BHMR and ACLR should be advocated, although patient-specific factors and further prospective studies remain important considerations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>Level III.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeo2.70199","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://esskajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
To compare displaced bucket-handle meniscus repair (BHMR) failure rates, subjective and objective knee function after BHMR in the setting of ACLR performed as a single-or two-stage procedure, and assess factors associated with BHMR survival.
Methods
This retrospective study included patients who underwent surgery between February 2015 and December 2021 at one institution. Patients with a displaced bucket-handle meniscus tear (BHMT) and ACL-injury undergoing BHMR and ACLR as a single- (concomitant BHMR and ACLR) or two-stage (BHMR and subsequent ACLR) procedure were identified. The primary outcome was the 2-year BHMR failure rate following ACLR, defined as reoperation with meniscus re-repair or resection. Additionally, 6-month range of motion (ROM), isokinetic knee (extension, flexion) strength, 1-and 2-year Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS), treatment failure (TF) were compared between the groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to assess BHMR survival, factors associated with repair survival were analysed through Cox proportional hazard regression analysis.
Results
The cohort included 159 displaced BHMRs, 120 (75.5%) underwent single-stage surgery. The overall BHMR failure rate was 27% (43/159). The single-stage surgery group had significantly lower failure rate (15% vs. 35.9%, p = 0.006). BHMT laterality, subjective (KOOS, PASS and TF) and objective (ROM, isokinetic strength) knee function did not differ significantly between the groups.
Conclusion
Patients who underwent single-stage displaced BHMR and ACLR had significantly lower BHMR failure rate compared to those who underwent two-stage surgery. Therefore, single-stage displaced BHMR and ACLR should be advocated, although patient-specific factors and further prospective studies remain important considerations.
目的比较单期或双期ACLR中移位桶柄半月板修复(BHMR)的失败率、主观和客观膝关节功能,并评估与BHMR生存相关的因素。方法本回顾性研究纳入2015年2月至2021年12月在一家机构接受手术的患者。对移位的桶柄半月板撕裂(BHMT)和acl损伤患者进行BHMR和ACLR单期(合并BHMR和ACLR)或两期(BHMR和随后的ACLR)手术。主要结果是ACLR后2年BHMR失败率,定义为半月板再手术或半月板再修复或切除。此外,比较两组患者6个月活动度(ROM)、膝关节等速(伸展、屈曲)强度、1年和2年膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分(oos)、患者可接受症状状态(PASS)、治疗失败(TF)。采用Kaplan-Meier分析评估BHMR生存,通过Cox比例风险回归分析分析与修复生存相关的因素。结果纳入159例移位的BHMRs患者,其中120例(75.5%)行单期手术。总体BHMR失败率为27%(43/159)。单期手术组失败率明显低于手术组(15% vs. 35.9%, p = 0.006)。BHMT侧度、主观(oos、PASS和TF)和客观(ROM、等速力量)膝关节功能在组间无显著差异。结论单期移位BHMR和ACLR患者的BHMR失败率明显低于两期手术患者。因此,应该提倡单期移位BHMR和ACLR,尽管患者特异性因素和进一步的前瞻性研究仍然是重要的考虑因素。证据等级三级。