Application of in silico methods to predict the acute toxicity of bicyclic organophosphorus compounds as potential chemical weapon.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY Archives of Toxicology Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1007/s00204-025-04000-8
Maciej Noga, Kamil Jurowski
{"title":"Application of in silico methods to predict the acute toxicity of bicyclic organophosphorus compounds as potential chemical weapon.","authors":"Maciej Noga, Kamil Jurowski","doi":"10.1007/s00204-025-04000-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bicyclic organophosphorus compounds (BOPCs), including flame retardants and plasticisers, are widely used in industrial applications because of their thermal stability and resistance to degradation. However, their unique structural properties and mechanisms of toxicity raise concerns regarding their potential misuse. Unlike classical organophosphorus compounds that inhibit acetylcholinesterase, BOPCs exert toxicity by antagonising gamma-aminobutyric acid receptors, resulting in severe neurotoxic effects, including convulsions and seizures. This underscores the urgent need to prioritise predictive toxicity studies on these compounds as part of a national defence strategy. The present study represents the first extensive application of in silico toxicological approaches to investigate the acute toxicity of a BOPC dataset (n = 18) utilising advanced in silico tools, such as QSAR models and probabilistic software/platforms, to predict acute oral toxicity in rats. All the investigated BOPCs are highly acutely toxic, judging from LD<sub>50</sub> values ranging for humans between < 1 mg and > 1.000 mg/kg bw, depending on the applied model. Noticeable variation between model predictions reminds us that present in silico approaches have significant limitations, at least when addressing chemically complex compounds, such as the BOPC class. This calls for wet-laboratory experimentation. Major toxicophoric groups, such as phosphate and phosphorothione moieties, have been identified as significant contributors to their toxicity. This study considers the need for high-level computational tools, well-founded experimental validation, targeted antidotes, and regulatory measures to reduce the risks from BOPCs and improve public health protection and chemical safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":8329,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-025-04000-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bicyclic organophosphorus compounds (BOPCs), including flame retardants and plasticisers, are widely used in industrial applications because of their thermal stability and resistance to degradation. However, their unique structural properties and mechanisms of toxicity raise concerns regarding their potential misuse. Unlike classical organophosphorus compounds that inhibit acetylcholinesterase, BOPCs exert toxicity by antagonising gamma-aminobutyric acid receptors, resulting in severe neurotoxic effects, including convulsions and seizures. This underscores the urgent need to prioritise predictive toxicity studies on these compounds as part of a national defence strategy. The present study represents the first extensive application of in silico toxicological approaches to investigate the acute toxicity of a BOPC dataset (n = 18) utilising advanced in silico tools, such as QSAR models and probabilistic software/platforms, to predict acute oral toxicity in rats. All the investigated BOPCs are highly acutely toxic, judging from LD50 values ranging for humans between < 1 mg and > 1.000 mg/kg bw, depending on the applied model. Noticeable variation between model predictions reminds us that present in silico approaches have significant limitations, at least when addressing chemically complex compounds, such as the BOPC class. This calls for wet-laboratory experimentation. Major toxicophoric groups, such as phosphate and phosphorothione moieties, have been identified as significant contributors to their toxicity. This study considers the need for high-level computational tools, well-founded experimental validation, targeted antidotes, and regulatory measures to reduce the risks from BOPCs and improve public health protection and chemical safety.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Toxicology
Archives of Toxicology 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
218
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Archives of Toxicology provides up-to-date information on the latest advances in toxicology. The journal places particular emphasis on studies relating to defined effects of chemicals and mechanisms of toxicity, including toxic activities at the molecular level, in humans and experimental animals. Coverage includes new insights into analysis and toxicokinetics and into forensic toxicology. Review articles of general interest to toxicologists are an additional important feature of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Application of in silico methods to predict the acute toxicity of bicyclic organophosphorus compounds as potential chemical weapon. Challenges in laser tattoo removal: the impact of titanium dioxide on photodegradation of yellow inks. Exploring the multifaceted impact of bisphosphonates on bone graft integration: transitioning from in vivo insights to clinical applications. In vitro approaches to investigate the effect of chemicals on antibody production: the case study of PFASs. Potential role of ochratoxin A in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review of current evidence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1