Shared medication coordination in a social psychiatric residence: adaptation to meet local requirements.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY BMC Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-03-06 DOI:10.1186/s12888-025-06653-2
Tina Birkeskov Axelsen, Charlotte Arp Sørensen, Anders Lindelof, Mette Spliid Ludvigsen
{"title":"Shared medication coordination in a social psychiatric residence: adaptation to meet local requirements.","authors":"Tina Birkeskov Axelsen, Charlotte Arp Sørensen, Anders Lindelof, Mette Spliid Ludvigsen","doi":"10.1186/s12888-025-06653-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Shared medication coordination (MedCo) is vital yet difficult to manage for residents living with severe mental disorders in residential care, where multidisciplinary teams provide support. A successful Shared MedCo model in one residence included three core components: \"shared decision-making,\" \"patient involvement\" and \"MedCo\". This model was effective but transfer to other residential settings needed implementation adaptation. The aim of this study was to meet local MedCo requirements by achieving a good fit between a Shared MedCo intervention core components and a social psychiatric residential context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The methodology was guided by a complex intervention adaptation framework involving co-creation with stakeholders to gather iterative feedback. The intervention was adapted through a systematic four-phase process and tested through shared consultations. Ten residents took part in the test, and the intervention's feasibility and acceptability were assessed.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The adaptation process ensured a good fit between the intervention's core components and the new context. Stakeholder input provided crucial content and contextual insights, while planned adaptations laid the foundation for modulating the individual residence Shared MedCo model. Iterative adaptations during the test phase refined the intervention, leading to near-routine performance by the tenth consultation. Residents gained a stronger voice in their healthcare, and all ten had their medication coordinated and optimised. The intervention was found feasible and acceptable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For effective implementation, complex multidisciplinary Shared MedCo interventions require contextual adaptation and active stakeholder involvement. The shared MedCo intervention offers a guideline for achieving a good fit between the intervention core components and diverse residential contexts, ensuring successful medication coordination for residents living with severe mental disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"25 1","pages":"209"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11887218/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-06653-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Shared medication coordination (MedCo) is vital yet difficult to manage for residents living with severe mental disorders in residential care, where multidisciplinary teams provide support. A successful Shared MedCo model in one residence included three core components: "shared decision-making," "patient involvement" and "MedCo". This model was effective but transfer to other residential settings needed implementation adaptation. The aim of this study was to meet local MedCo requirements by achieving a good fit between a Shared MedCo intervention core components and a social psychiatric residential context.

Methods: The methodology was guided by a complex intervention adaptation framework involving co-creation with stakeholders to gather iterative feedback. The intervention was adapted through a systematic four-phase process and tested through shared consultations. Ten residents took part in the test, and the intervention's feasibility and acceptability were assessed.

Findings: The adaptation process ensured a good fit between the intervention's core components and the new context. Stakeholder input provided crucial content and contextual insights, while planned adaptations laid the foundation for modulating the individual residence Shared MedCo model. Iterative adaptations during the test phase refined the intervention, leading to near-routine performance by the tenth consultation. Residents gained a stronger voice in their healthcare, and all ten had their medication coordinated and optimised. The intervention was found feasible and acceptable.

Conclusion: For effective implementation, complex multidisciplinary Shared MedCo interventions require contextual adaptation and active stakeholder involvement. The shared MedCo intervention offers a guideline for achieving a good fit between the intervention core components and diverse residential contexts, ensuring successful medication coordination for residents living with severe mental disorders.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会精神病院共享药物协调:适应当地需求。
背景:共享药物协调(MedCo)对于居住在寄宿护理中的严重精神障碍患者至关重要,但难以管理,在那里多学科团队提供支持。一个成功的共享MedCo模式包括三个核心组成部分:“共同决策”、“患者参与”和“MedCo”。这种模式是有效的,但要转移到其他住宅环境中需要进行实施调整。本研究的目的是通过实现共享MedCo干预核心组件与社会精神病住院环境之间的良好契合来满足当地MedCo的要求。方法:该方法以涉及与利益相关者共同创造的复杂干预适应框架为指导,以收集迭代反馈。干预措施通过系统的四阶段过程进行调整,并通过共同协商进行测试。10名居民参与测试,评估干预的可行性和可接受性。研究结果:适应过程确保了干预措施的核心组成部分与新环境之间的良好契合。利益相关者的意见提供了关键的内容和背景见解,而计划的调整为调整个人住宅共享医疗保健模式奠定了基础。测试阶段的反复调整改进了干预措施,在第十次咨询时获得了接近常规的性能。居民在他们的医疗保健方面获得了更大的发言权,所有10人的药物都得到了协调和优化。干预是可行和可接受的。结论:为了有效实施,复杂的多学科共享MedCo干预措施需要情境适应和利益相关者的积极参与。共享的MedCo干预为实现干预核心组件与不同居住环境之间的良好契合提供了指导,确保患有严重精神障碍的居民成功地进行药物协调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Machine learning model to identify gut microbiome-derived metabolites as potential biomarkers of autism spectrum disorder: a pilot study. "Creation involved a lot of inspiration which drove me to create, and the creation was a record of myself at different moments": a nine-month photovoice study of creative practices and recovery from bipolar disorder. Therapeutic interventions for adolescent suicidal behavior and self-harm: an umbrella review for developing clinical practice guidelines in South Korea. Problematic internet use and depression among healthcare students in Macau: the mediating role of insomnia. What helps people with mental illness to function in daily life? Findings from a Delphi study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1