The role of metacognition and social cognition in childhood trauma effecting on prognosis: 1-year follow-up study in patients with first-episode schizophrenia.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY BMC Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1186/s12888-025-06686-7
Özge Selin Özen Sekmek, Gülsüm Zuhal Kamış, Bedirhan Şenol, Özgecan Özgün Erol, Mustafa Uğurlu, Erol Göka
{"title":"The role of metacognition and social cognition in childhood trauma effecting on prognosis: 1-year follow-up study in patients with first-episode schizophrenia.","authors":"Özge Selin Özen Sekmek, Gülsüm Zuhal Kamış, Bedirhan Şenol, Özgecan Özgün Erol, Mustafa Uğurlu, Erol Göka","doi":"10.1186/s12888-025-06686-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Childhood trauma (CT) is common in first episode schizophrenia (FES), affecting prognosis and functionality. However, the mechanisms by which CT effects prognosis are not clear. This study aimed to investigate how metacognition (MC) and social cognition (SC) mediate effects of CT on symptoms in FEP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>52 first episode schizophrenia patients who were diagnosed for first time and had been symptomatic for at most 2 years were included. Patients were administered Metacognition Assessment Scale-Abbreviated to assess MC; Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test, Facial Emotion Recognition and Discrimination Tests to assess SC; Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale to assess psychopathology and Global Assessment of Functioning Scale to assess functionality at first interview. Patients were followed up for 1 year. At second interview the above scales and Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-33 were applied to 38 patients who met remission criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MC and SC modulated effects of CT on negative symptoms, but not on positive symptoms. CT had different effects on symptoms, MC and SC skills in episode and remission. Pharmacological treatment was not sufficient to improve these skills.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MC and SC skills are important in modulating CT effecting on prognosis and non-pharmacological interventions should be developed to improve these skills.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"25 1","pages":"260"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11921519/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-06686-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Childhood trauma (CT) is common in first episode schizophrenia (FES), affecting prognosis and functionality. However, the mechanisms by which CT effects prognosis are not clear. This study aimed to investigate how metacognition (MC) and social cognition (SC) mediate effects of CT on symptoms in FEP.

Methods: 52 first episode schizophrenia patients who were diagnosed for first time and had been symptomatic for at most 2 years were included. Patients were administered Metacognition Assessment Scale-Abbreviated to assess MC; Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test, Facial Emotion Recognition and Discrimination Tests to assess SC; Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale to assess psychopathology and Global Assessment of Functioning Scale to assess functionality at first interview. Patients were followed up for 1 year. At second interview the above scales and Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-33 were applied to 38 patients who met remission criteria.

Results: MC and SC modulated effects of CT on negative symptoms, but not on positive symptoms. CT had different effects on symptoms, MC and SC skills in episode and remission. Pharmacological treatment was not sufficient to improve these skills.

Conclusions: MC and SC skills are important in modulating CT effecting on prognosis and non-pharmacological interventions should be developed to improve these skills.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
元认知和社会认知在儿童创伤对预后的影响:首发精神分裂症患者1年随访研究
背景:儿童创伤(CT)在首发精神分裂症(FES)中很常见,影响预后和功能。然而,CT影响预后的机制尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨元认知(MC)和社会认知(SC)如何介导CT对FEP症状的影响。方法:选取52例首次确诊且症状不超过2年的首发精神分裂症患者。采用元认知评估量表(简称元认知量表)评估患者的认知能力;“眼读心术”测试、“面部情绪识别与辨别”测试对SC的评价正面和负面综合症量表评估精神病理和整体功能评估量表评估第一次面试的功能。随访1年。在第二次访谈中,对38例符合缓解标准的患者应用上述量表和儿童创伤问卷-33。结果:MC和SC调节CT对阴性症状的作用,但对阳性症状没有调节作用。CT对发作期和缓解期的症状、MC和SC技能有不同的影响。药物治疗不足以提高这些技能。结论:MC和SC技能在调节CT对预后的影响中起重要作用,应发展非药物干预措施以提高这些技能。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
DIALOG+ for service users with chronic depression: a cluster-randomised controlled feasibility trial and qualitative evaluation. Association between visceral adiposity index and incident dementia: a community-based cohort study. Non-pharmacological interventions for antipsychotic drug-related metabolic abnormalities: a systematic narrative review. Ultra-high field magnetic resonance spectroscopy study of transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment in adolescents with depression. A randomized controlled trial of an Internet-based self-help skill strengthening (ISSS) intervention for secondary school teachers: a transdiagnostic intervention for common mental health problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1