Outcomes of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve decompression surgery in meralgia paraesthetica: assessment of pain, sensory deficits, and quality of life.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS International Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1007/s00264-025-06463-x
Francesco Reuter, Karl Schwaiger, Paul Panzenbeck, Michaela Gruber, Maximilian Mahrhofer, Martin Geroldinger, Andreas Gohritz, Gottfried Wechselberger, Elisabeth Russe
{"title":"Outcomes of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve decompression surgery in meralgia paraesthetica: assessment of pain, sensory deficits, and quality of life.","authors":"Francesco Reuter, Karl Schwaiger, Paul Panzenbeck, Michaela Gruber, Maximilian Mahrhofer, Martin Geroldinger, Andreas Gohritz, Gottfried Wechselberger, Elisabeth Russe","doi":"10.1007/s00264-025-06463-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Meralgia paraesthetica (MP) is a rare neuropathy of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN), characterized by thigh pain, paraesthesia, or sensory loss. When conservative treatments fail, surgical interventions such as neurolysis or neurectomy are considered. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of surgical decompression of the LFCN in alleviating pain, addressing sensory deficits, and improving quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective study was conducted on 26 patients who underwent LFCN decompression surgery between 2015 and 2023, with a minimum follow-up period of one year. Outcomes were assessed using pre- and postoperative questionnaires, including the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and the Pain Disability Index (PDI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort consisted of 15 males and 11 females, with 81% reporting symptom onset following prior surgeries or trauma. Postoperatively, 95.8% of patients experienced pain relief, with 76.9% achieving complete pain resolution (NRS 0). There was a significant reduction in average perceived pain (from 6.6 ± 1.9 to 0.7 ± 1.1; p < 0.001) and maximum perceived pain (8.0 ± 1.54 to 1.0 ± 1.67; p < 0.001). Full sensory function was restored in 61.2% of patients, and quality of life scores improved markedly, with an average increase of 8.4 out of 10 points (± 1.9; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results demonstrate that neurolysis of the LFCN is highly effective in the treatment of refractory MP, offering substantial pain relief, sensory restoration, and improved quality of life. Furthermore, patients with previous injuries or surgeries benefited most from NL, suggesting that these factors serve as positive prognostic indicators.</p>","PeriodicalId":14450,"journal":{"name":"International Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":"863-870"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-025-06463-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Meralgia paraesthetica (MP) is a rare neuropathy of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN), characterized by thigh pain, paraesthesia, or sensory loss. When conservative treatments fail, surgical interventions such as neurolysis or neurectomy are considered. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of surgical decompression of the LFCN in alleviating pain, addressing sensory deficits, and improving quality of life.

Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 26 patients who underwent LFCN decompression surgery between 2015 and 2023, with a minimum follow-up period of one year. Outcomes were assessed using pre- and postoperative questionnaires, including the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and the Pain Disability Index (PDI).

Results: The cohort consisted of 15 males and 11 females, with 81% reporting symptom onset following prior surgeries or trauma. Postoperatively, 95.8% of patients experienced pain relief, with 76.9% achieving complete pain resolution (NRS 0). There was a significant reduction in average perceived pain (from 6.6 ± 1.9 to 0.7 ± 1.1; p < 0.001) and maximum perceived pain (8.0 ± 1.54 to 1.0 ± 1.67; p < 0.001). Full sensory function was restored in 61.2% of patients, and quality of life scores improved markedly, with an average increase of 8.4 out of 10 points (± 1.9; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: These results demonstrate that neurolysis of the LFCN is highly effective in the treatment of refractory MP, offering substantial pain relief, sensory restoration, and improved quality of life. Furthermore, patients with previous injuries or surgeries benefited most from NL, suggesting that these factors serve as positive prognostic indicators.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
股外侧皮神经减压手术治疗痛觉异常的结果:疼痛、感觉缺陷和生活质量的评估。
目的:感觉异常痛(MP)是一种罕见的股外侧皮神经(LFCN)神经病,以大腿疼痛、感觉异常或感觉丧失为特征。当保守治疗失败时,考虑手术干预,如神经松解术或神经切除术。本研究旨在评估手术减压在减轻疼痛、解决感觉缺陷和改善生活质量方面的有效性。方法:前瞻性研究选取2015 - 2023年间行LFCN减压手术的26例患者,随访时间最少1年。使用术前和术后问卷评估结果,包括简短疼痛量表(BPI)和疼痛残疾指数(PDI)。结果:该队列包括15名男性和11名女性,81%的患者报告在既往手术或创伤后出现症状。术后,95.8%的患者疼痛缓解,76.9%的患者疼痛完全缓解(NRS 0),平均感知疼痛显著降低(从6.6±1.9降至0.7±1.1;结论:这些结果表明LFCN神经松解术在治疗难治性MP中非常有效,提供了大量的疼痛缓解,感觉恢复和提高生活质量。此外,既往受过损伤或手术的患者从NL中获益最多,表明这些因素可作为积极的预后指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Orthopaedics
International Orthopaedics 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
360
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: International Orthopaedics, the Official Journal of the Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie (SICOT) , publishes original papers from all over the world. The articles deal with clinical orthopaedic surgery or basic research directly connected with orthopaedic surgery. International Orthopaedics will also link all the members of SICOT by means of an insert that will be concerned with SICOT matters. Finally, it is expected that news and information regarding all aspects of orthopaedic surgery, including meetings, panels, instructional courses, etc. will be brought to the attention of the readers. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted. Reports of animal experiments must state that the "Principles of laboratory animal care" (NIH publication No. 85-23, revised 1985) were followed, as well as specific national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals) where applicable. The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfil the above-mentioned requirements.
期刊最新文献
Capsular reconstruction versus excision in anterolateral total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ultrasound-guided Morton's neuroma injection: the "three-handed" technique and initial outcomes: a retrospective study. Three-Zone threshold of acetabular cartilage damage predicts failure to achieve minimal clinically important difference after hip arthroscopy. In-house three dimensional-printed cutting guides improve surgical accuracy in children who underwent resection of malignant bone tumours of lower limb and reconstruction with allograft. Efficacy and safety of limb lengthening in achondroplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1